Literature DB >> 33401539

Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources.

Felix Bernauer1, Kathrin Behnen1, Joachim Wassermann1, Sven Egdorf1, Heiner Igel1, Stefanie Donner2, Klaus Stammler2, Mathias Hoffmann2, Pascal Edme3, David Sollberger3, Cédric Schmelzbach3, Johan Robertsson3, Patrick Paitz3, Jonas Igel3, Krystyna Smolinski3, Andreas Fichtner3, Yara Rossi4, Gizem Izgi5, Daniel Vollmer5, Eva P S Eibl5, Stefan Buske6, Christian Veress7, Frederic Guattari8, Theo Laudat8, Laurent Mattio8, Olivie Sèbe9, Serge Olivier9, Charlie Lallemand9, Basil Brunner10, Anna T Kurzych11, Michał Dudek11, Leszek R Jaroszewicz11, Jerzy K Kowalski12, Piotr A Bońkowski13, Piotr Bobra13, Zbigniew Zembaty13, Jiří Vackář14, Jiří Málek14, Johana Brokesova15.   

Abstract

Interest in measuring displacement gradients, such as rotation and strain, is growing in many areas of geophysical research. This results in an urgent demand for reliable and field-deployable instruments measuring these quantities. In order to further establish a high-quality standard for rotation and strain measurements in seismology, we organized a comparative sensor test experiment that took place in November 2019 at the Geophysical Observatory of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany. More than 24 different sensors, including three-component and single-component broadband rotational seismometers, six-component strong-motion sensors and Rotaphone systems, as well as the large ring laser gyroscopes ROMY and a Distributed Acoustic Sensing system, were involved in addition to 14 classical broadband seismometers and a 160 channel, 4.5 Hz geophone chain. The experiment consisted of two parts: during the first part, the sensors were co-located in a huddle test recording self-noise and signals from small, nearby explosions. In a second part, the sensors were distributed into the field in various array configurations recording seismic signals that were generated by small amounts of explosive and a Vibroseis truck. This paper presents details on the experimental setup and a first sensor performance comparison focusing on sensor self-noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and waveform similarities for the rotation rate sensors. Most of the sensors show a high level of coherency and waveform similarity within a narrow frequency range between 10 Hz and 20 Hz for recordings from a nearby explosion signal. Sensor as well as experiment design are critically accessed revealing the great need for reliable reference sensors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  instrumentation; rotation sensors; seismology; strain sensors

Year:  2021        PMID: 33401539      PMCID: PMC7795288          DOI: 10.3390/s21010264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  10 in total

1.  A high-precision mechanical absolute-rotation sensor.

Authors:  Krishna Venkateswara; Charles A Hagedorn; Matthew D Turner; Trevor Arp; Jens H Gundlach
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Lindsey; T Craig Dawe; Jonathan B Ajo-Franklin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study.

Authors:  Shan Dou; Nate Lindsey; Anna M Wagner; Thomas M Daley; Barry Freifeld; Michelle Robertson; John Peterson; Craig Ulrich; Eileen R Martin; Jonathan B Ajo-Franklin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dynamic strain determination using fibre-optic cables allows imaging of seismological and structural features.

Authors:  Philippe Jousset; Thomas Reinsch; Trond Ryberg; Hanna Blanck; Andy Clarke; Rufat Aghayev; Gylfi P Hersir; Jan Henninges; Michael Weber; Charlotte M Krawczyk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  The Fiber-Optic Rotational Seismograph-Laboratory Tests and Field Application.

Authors:  Leszek R Jaroszewicz; Anna Kurzych; Zbigniew Krajewski; Michał Dudek; Jerzy K Kowalski; Krzysztof P Teisseyre
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  A Review of the Capacitive MEMS for Seismology.

Authors:  Antonino D'Alessandro; Salvatore Scudero; Giovanni Vitale
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Seismological Processing of Six Degree-of-Freedom Ground-Motion Data.

Authors:  David Sollberger; Heiner Igel; Cedric Schmelzbach; Pascal Edme; Dirk-Jan van Manen; Felix Bernauer; Shihao Yuan; Joachim Wassermann; Ulrich Schreiber; Johan O A Robertsson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Distributed acoustic sensing of microseismic sources and wave propagation in glaciated terrain.

Authors:  F Walter; D Gräff; F Lindner; P Paitz; M Köpfli; M Chmiel; A Fichtner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Equations of Disturbed Motion of the Moving Part of the Gyroscope Suspension.

Authors:  Igor Korobiichuk; Viktorij Mel'nick; Vera Kosova; Kateryna Maksymenko
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Performance Test of the Rotational Sensor blueSeis-3A in a Huddle Test in Fürstenfeldbruck.

Authors:  Gizem Izgi; Eva P S Eibl; Stefanie Donner; Felix Bernauer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.