Literature DB >> 33401381

Fifteen Year Regional Center Experience in Sperm Banking for Cancer Patients: Use and Reproductive Outcomes in Survivors.

Sara Stigliani1, Claudia Massarotti2, Caterina De Leo2, Elena Maccarini1, Fausta Sozzi1, Angelo Cagnacci2, Paola Anserini1, Paola Scaruffi1.   

Abstract

Cancer treatments frequently impair the reproductive ability of patients by damaging spermatogenesis. International guidelines recommend semen cryopreservation to preserve the fertility of oncological adult males and pubertal boys. However, due to the low usage rate of banked samples, not a lot of data on assisted reproductive treatments (ART) success rates in this population and follow-up data for children born are available in the literature. The aims of this study were to report our 15 years of experience, the clinical outcomes of ART as well as neonatal characteristics of babies born. We retrospectively reviewed 682 oncological patients who were referred to our center from 2004 to 2019 for fertility preservation. Over the years, only 26 patients (4%) returned to use their sperm by ART. They were survivors of leukemia and lymphomas (52%), testicular cancer (20%), and other malignant diseases (28%). These couples performed 45 cycles: 34 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) plus 11 frozen embryo transfers. A total of 13 children were born, with 35% of the cumulative live-birth delivery rate per couple. No stillbirths or malformations were recorded. These successful findings demonstrated that pregnancy could be safely achieved using frozen-thawed sperm of cancer survivors who cryopreserved before gonadotoxic therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICSI; assisted reproduction treatment (ART); cancer; fertility preservation; pregnancy after cancer; pregnancy outcome; sperm cryopreservation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33401381      PMCID: PMC7796110          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  42 in total

1.  A programme of semen cryopreservation for patients with malignant disease in a tertiary infertility centre: lessons from 8 years' experience.

Authors:  A Lass; F Akagbosu; N Abusheikha; M Hassouneh; M Blayney; S Avery; P Brinsden
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  DNA damage in patients with untreated cancer as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; K Larson; R K Sharma; D R Nelson; D P Evenson; H Toma; A J Thomas; A Agarwal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Sperm banking and assisted reproduction treatment for couples following cancer treatment of the male partner.

Authors:  A Lass; F Akagbosu; P Brinsden
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Genetic and teratogenic effects of cancer treatments on gametes and embryos.

Authors:  J Arnon; D Meirow; H Lewis-Roness; A Ornoy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Fertility preservation for men with testicular cancer: Is sperm cryopreservation cost effective in the era of assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Kirven Gilbert; Ajay K Nangia; James M Dupree; James F Smith; Akanksha Mehta
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Successful sperm storage for 28 years.

Authors:  Joseph Feldschuh; James Brassel; Nancy Durso; Allen Levine
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Neonatal anthropometric charts: the Italian neonatal study compared with other European studies.

Authors:  Enrico Bertino; Elena Spada; Luciana Occhi; Alessandra Coscia; Francesca Giuliani; Luigi Gagliardi; Giulio Gilli; Gianni Bona; Claudio Fabris; Mario De Curtis; Silvano Milani
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples.

Authors:  Kirsten L Tryde Schmidt; Elisabeth Larsen; Susanne Bangsbøll; Helle Meinertz; Elisabeth Carlsen; Anders Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Ariel Hourvitz; Dan E Goldschlag; Owen K Davis; Lucinda Veeck Gosden; Gianpiero D Palermo; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Semen cryobanking for men with cancer--criteria change.

Authors:  W G Sanger; J H Olson; J K Sherman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  Per1/Per2 Disruption Reduces Testosterone Synthesis and Impairs Fertility in Elderly Male Mice.

Authors:  Qinrui Liu; Hu Wang; Hualin Wang; Na Li; Ruyi He; Zhiguo Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  mTOR/EGFR/iNOS/MAP2K1/FGFR/TGFB1 Are Druggable Candidates for N-(2,4-Difluorophenyl)-2',4'-Difluoro-4-Hydroxybiphenyl-3-Carboxamide (NSC765598), With Consequent Anticancer Implications.

Authors:  Bashir Lawal; Ching-Yu Lee; Ntlotlang Mokgautsi; Maryam Rachmawati Sumitra; Harshita Khedkar; Alexander T H Wu; Hsu-Shan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study.

Authors:  David Pening; Marnie Constant; Manon Bruynbroeck; Anne Delbaere; I Demeestere
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.