Literature DB >> 33400238

Biosimilar Perceptions Among Healthcare Professionals and Commercial Medical Benefit Policy Analysis in the United States.

Kyle Herndon1,2, Jason Braithwaite3,4, Brittany Berry3,4, Kathleen Bourget3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars represent a significant cost savings opportunity for the entire healthcare system. Despite efforts from the United States Food and Drug Administration, adoption has not been as successful as originally hoped. Perceived barriers to adoption of biosimilars have been described previously, but more knowledge is needed. Further, increased understanding is needed surrounding commercial payer preferences of biosimilars.
METHODS: A survey to assess perceived barriers to biosimilar adoption was dispersed to healthcare leaders who work in health-systems, physician practices, and the pharmaceutical industry. Policies from the top 15 commercial payers, by covered lives, were reviewed to collect information surrounding coverage and preferred products to assess if perceptions from healthcare leaders align with payer policies.
RESULTS: The largest number of responses (n = 76) came from health-systems (n = 56), followed by pharmaceutical manufacturers (n = 12), and physician practices (n = 8). Responses from each cohort aligned very closely with the composite results of the group. Responses surrounding safety and efficacy were high amongst all groups, while rebate increases to payers for reference products were of highest concern for adoption. United Healthcare had the most policies preferring biosimilars (6/7, 86%). Filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio), had the most preferred statuses for a biosimilar (10/15, 67%). The infliximab reference product had the most preferred statuses for a reference product (9/15, 60%).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study outline the greatest perceived barriers to adoption of biosimilars from a variety of different stakeholders. Rebates from reference product manufacturers to payers was the main deterrent for biosimilar use.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33400238     DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00463-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  4 in total

1.  Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential.

Authors:  Andrew W Mulcahy; Jakub P Hlavka; Spencer R Case
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2018-03-30

2.  Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily Leonard; Michael Wascovich; Sonia Oskouei; Paula Gurz; Delesha Carpenter
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2019-01

3.  Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adopting Biosimilars and Achieving Goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: A Survey of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Professionals.

Authors:  Laurence Greene; Rubina M Singh; Mary Jo Carden; Caroline O Pardo; Gary R Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2019-04-22

4.  Following the Biosimilar Breadcrumbs: When Health Systems and Manufacturers Approach Forks in the Road.

Authors:  Sonia T Oskouei
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2017-12
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Physician Understanding and Willingness to Prescribe Biosimilars: Findings from a US National Survey.

Authors:  Allison R Kolbe; Aaron Kearsley; Lubna Merchant; Eva Temkin; Archita Patel; Jing Xu; Amber Jessup
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.807

2.  Economic Analysis on Adoption of Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors in Patients With Nonmyeloid Cancer at Risk of Febrile Neutropenia Within the Oncology Care Model Framework.

Authors:  Weijia Wang; Edward Li; Kim Campbell; Ali McBride; Steve D'Amato
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians.

Authors:  Jingyan Yang; Kelly Blinzler; Joshua Lankin; Sapna Vijayakumar; Martine C Maculaitis; Ahmed Shelbaya
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.807

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.