Literature DB >> 33400201

Variation in management of post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after thoracic surgery.

Heidi Oi-Yee Li1, Heather A Smith2, Olivier Brandts-Longtin1, Donna E Maziak3, Sebastien Gilbert3, Paul Villeneuve3, Sudhir Sundaresan3, Andrew J E Seely3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: New-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent adverse event following major thoracic surgery and is associated with increased risk of perioperative morbidity, length of stay and stroke. It is managed initially with rate and rhythm control therapy; however, optimal duration and the need for anticoagulation are poorly understood. This study aims to assess practice variation regarding POAF management and duration.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent major thoracic surgery and developed POAF between 2008 and 2017, managed with rate and rhythm control therapy alone. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables/outcomes, POAF management, and incidence of POAF recurrence in the 30-day post-operative period were collected. Chi-square and T-tests determined significance.
RESULTS: Of 2054 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, 155 (75%) patients developed POAF. Different rate and rhythm control agents were used, most commonly metoprolol. 107 (69%) continued rate and rhythm control therapy upon hospital discharge for a mean of 56 days. Among the 48 patients with discontinuation of rate and rhythm control therapy on discharge, none demonstrated recurrence of POAF; in contrast to 3 of 107 patients who continued on therapy. Among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, 15% were prescribed anticoagulation on discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of rate and rhythm control therapy and anticoagulation for POAF is significantly varied in practice. Many patients are not continued on rate and rhythm control after hospital discharge, which does not appear to impact risk of POAF recurrence. Further research to inform guidelines for POAF management, including therapy duration and indications for anticoagulation is warranted.
© 2021. The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Outcomes; Perioperative care; Rate control therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33400201     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-020-01574-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  11 in total

1.  Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  J K Lee; G J Klein; A D Krahn; R Yee; K Zarnke; C Simpson; A Skanes; B Spindler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  A review and analysis of strategies for prediction, prevention and management of post-operative atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Heather Smith; Ching Yeung; Stephen Gowing; Mouhannad Sadek; Donna Maziak; Sebastien Gilbert; Farid Shamji; Patrick Villeneuve; Sudhir Sundaresan; Andrew Seely
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score 0-1: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Morten Lock Hansen; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 4.  2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures. Executive summary.

Authors:  Gyorgy Frendl; Alissa C Sodickson; Mina K Chung; Albert L Waldo; Bernard J Gersh; James E Tisdale; Hugh Calkins; Sary Aranki; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Stephen Cassivi; Sidney C Smith; Dawood Darbar; Jon O Wee; Thomas K Waddell; David Amar; Dale Adler
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Predictors, Prognosis, and Management of New Clinically Important Atrial Fibrillation After Noncardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso-Coello; Deborah Cook; Shou Chun Xu; Alben Sigamani; Otavio Berwanger; Soori Sivakumaran; Homer Yang; Denis Xavier; Luz Ximena Martinez; Pedro Ibarra; Purnima Rao-Melacini; Janice Pogue; Kelly Zarnke; Pilar Paniagua; Jack Ostrander; Salim Yusuf; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J E Seely; Jelena Ivanovic; Jennifer Threader; Ahmed Al-Hussaini; Derar Al-Shehab; Tim Ramsay; Sebastian Gilbert; Donna E Maziak; Farid M Shamji; R Sudhir Sundaresan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Perioperative/Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Subsequent Stroke and/or Mortality.

Authors:  Meng-Hsin Lin; Hooman Kamel; Daniel E Singer; Yi-Ling Wu; Meng Lee; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  New-onset atrial fibrillation after anatomic lung resection: predictive factors, treatment and follow-up in a UK thoracic centre.

Authors:  Megan Garner; Tom Routledge; Juliet E King; John E Pilling; Lukacs Veres; Karen Harrison-Phipps; Andrea Bille; Leanne Harling
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-02-01

9.  Risk of Thromboembolism Associated With Atrial Fibrillation Following Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jawad H Butt; Jonas B Olesen; Eva Havers-Borgersen; Anna Gundlund; Charlotte Andersson; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber; Emil L Fosbøl
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Atrial fibrillation after pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer affects long-term survival in a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Andrea Imperatori; Giovanni Mariscalco; Giuditta Riganti; Nicola Rotolo; Valentina Conti; Lorenzo Dominioni
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.