Literature DB >> 33399962

Light at night reduces digestive efficiency of developing birds: an experiment with king quail.

Tuul Sepp1,2, Emily Webb3, Richard K Simpson3,4, Mathieu Giraudeau3,5, Kevin J McGraw3, Pierce Hutton3.   

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) exposes animals to a novel environmental stimulus, one that is generally thought to be maladaptive. ALAN-related health problems have received little attention in non-model species, and we generally know little about the nutritional-physiological impacts of ALAN, especially in young animals. Here, we use a novel application of the acid steatocrit method to experimentally assess changes in digestive efficiency of growing king quail (Excalfactoria chinensis) in response to ALAN. Two weeks after hatching, quail were split into two groups (n = 20-21 per group): overnight-light-treated vs. overnight-dark-treated. When the chicks were 3 weeks old, the experimental group was exposed to weak blue light (ca. 0.3 lux) throughout the entire night for 6 consecutive weeks, until all the chicks had achieved sexual maturation. Fecal samples for assessing digestive efficiency were collected every week. We found that digestive efficiency of quail was reduced by ALAN at two time points from weeks 4 to 9 after hatching (quail reach adulthood by week 9). The negative effect of ALAN on digestion coincided with the period of fastest skeletal growth, which suggests that ALAN may reduce digestive efficiency when energetic demands of growth are at their highest. Interestingly, growth rate was not influenced by ALAN. This suggests that either the negative physiological impacts of ALAN may be concealed when food is provided ad libitum, the observed changes in digestive efficiency were too small to affect growth or condition, or that ALAN-exposed birds had reduced energy expenditure. Our results illustrate that the health impacts of ALAN on wild animals should not be restricted to traditional markers like body mass or growth rate, but instead on a wide array of integrated physiological traits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian; Development; Digestion; Excalfactoria chinensis; Light pollution; Steatocrit

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33399962     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-020-01715-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  18 in total

Review 1.  Effects of artificial light at night on human health: A literature review of observational and experimental studies applied to exposure assessment.

Authors:  YongMin Cho; Seung-Hun Ryu; Byeo Ri Lee; Kyung Hee Kim; Eunil Lee; Jaewook Choi
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; John Hopkins
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-08

Review 3.  The effects of light at night on circadian clocks and metabolism.

Authors:  Laura K Fonken; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  Melatonin mends adverse temporal effects of bright light at night partially independent of its effect on stress responses in captive birds.

Authors:  I Malek; A Haim; I Izhaki
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Light at night increases body mass by shifting the time of food intake.

Authors:  Laura K Fonken; Joanna L Workman; James C Walton; Zachary M Weil; John S Morris; Abraham Haim; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Jeremy C Borniger; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Ascites syndrome in broilers: physiological and nutritional perspectives.

Authors:  A Baghbanzadeh; E Decuypere
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.378

8.  The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness.

Authors:  Fabio Falchi; Pierantonio Cinzano; Dan Duriscoe; Christopher C M Kyba; Christopher D Elvidge; Kimberly Baugh; Boris A Portnov; Nataliya A Rybnikova; Riccardo Furgoni
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Dim artificial light at night reduces the cellular immune response of the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  Joanna Durrant; Mark P Green; Therésa M Jones
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.262

10.  Blue light at night acutely impairs glucose tolerance and increases sugar intake in the diurnal rodent Arvicanthis ansorgei in a sex-dependent manner.

Authors:  Anayanci Masís-Vargas; David Hicks; Andries Kalsbeek; Jorge Mendoza
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-10
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nocturnal lighting in animal research should be replicable and reflect relevant ecological conditions.

Authors:  Anne E Aulsebrook; Andreas Jechow; Annette Krop-Benesch; Christopher C M Kyba; Travis Longcore; Elizabeth K Perkin; Roy H A van Grunsven
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.