Literature DB >> 33399885

The association between migrant status and transition in an ultra-high risk for psychosis population.

Brian O'Donoghue1,2, Hellen Geros3,4, Holly Sizer3,4, Jean Addington5, G Paul Amminger3,4,6, Carrie E Beaden7, Kristin S Cadenhead8, Tyrone D Cannon9, Barbara A Cornblatt10, Gregor Emanuel Berger11, Eric Y H Chen12, Lieuwe de Haan13, Jessica A Hartmann3,4, Ian B Hickie14, Helga K Ising15, Suzie Lavoie3,4, Ashleigh Lin16, Connie Markulev3,4, Daniel H Mathalon17,18, Thomas H McGlashan19, Nathan G Mifsud3,4, Nilufar Mossaheb6, Dorien H Nieman13, Merete Nordentoft20, Diana O Perkins21, Anita Riecher-Rössler22, Miriam R Schäfer3,4, Monika Schlögelhofer6, Larry J Seidman23,24, Stephan Smesny25, Andrew Thompson3,4, Ming T Tsuang8, Mark van der Gaag15,26, Swapna Verma27, Elaine F Walker28, Stephen J Wood3,4, Scott W Woods19, Hok Pan Yuen3,4, Alison Ruth Yung3,4,29, Patrick D McGorry3,4, Barnaby Nelson3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Migrant status is one of the most replicated and robust risk factors for developing a psychotic disorder. This study aimed to determine whether migrant status in people identified as Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis (UHR) was associated with risk of transitioning to a full-threshold psychotic disorder.
METHODS: Hazard ratios for the risk of transition were calculated from five large UHR cohorts (n = 2166) and were used to conduct a meta-analysis using the generic inverse-variance method using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: 2166 UHR young people, with a mean age of 19.1 years (SD ± 4.5) were included, of whom 221 (10.7%) were first-generation migrants. A total of 357 young people transitioned to psychosis over a median follow-up time of 417 days (I.Q.R.147-756 days), representing 17.0% of the cohort. The risk of transition to a full-threshold disorder was not increased for first-generation migrants, (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.62-1.89); however, there was a high level of heterogeneity between studies The hazard ratio for second-generation migrants to transition to a full-threshold psychotic disorder compared to the remainder of the native-born population was 1.03 (95% CI 0.70-1.51).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant association between migrant status and an increased risk for transition to a full-threshold psychotic disorder; however, several methodological issues could explain this finding. Further research should focus on examining the risk of specific migrant groups and also ensuring that migrant populations are adequately represented within UHR clinics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Migrants; Psychotic disorders; Ultra-high risk for psychosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33399885     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-02012-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  23 in total

1.  The ultra-high risk concept-a review.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Barnaby Nelson
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Ilaria Bonoldi; Alison R Yung; Stefan Borgwardt; Matthew J Kempton; Lucia Valmaggia; Francesco Barale; Edgardo Caverzasi; Philip McGuire
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Predictors of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.

Authors:  Jean Addington; Megan Farris; Jacqueline Stowkowy; Olga Santesteban-Echarri; Paul Metzak; Mohammed Shakeel Kalathil
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Risk of psychotic disorders in migrants to Australia.

Authors:  Brian O'Donoghue; Linglee Downey; Scott Eaton; Nathan Mifsud; James B Kirkbride; Patrick McGorry
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  The incidence of schizophrenia in European immigrants to Canada.

Authors:  G N Smith; J Boydell; R M Murray; S Flynn; K McKay; M Sherwood; W G Honer
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Schizophrenia and migration: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cantor-Graae; Jean-Paul Selten
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K K Anderson; J Edwards
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  Psychoses sans Frontieres: towards an interdisciplinary understanding of psychosis risk amongst migrants and their descendants.

Authors:  J Dykxhoorn; J B Kirkbride
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 9.  Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in Caribbean-born migrants and their descendants in England: systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence rates, 1950-2013.

Authors:  A Tortelli; A Errazuriz; T Croudace; C Morgan; R M Murray; P B Jones; A Szoke; J B Kirkbride
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Migration and psychosis: a meta-analysis of incidence studies.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Selten; Els van der Ven; Fabian Termorshuizen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  2 in total

1.  Equity in Mental Health Services for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Considering Marginalized Identities and Stressors.

Authors:  Joseph S DeLuca; Derek M Novacek; Laura H Adery; Shaynna N Herrera; Yulia Landa; Cheryl M Corcoran; Elaine F Walker
Journal:  Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Comparing Risk Factors for Non-affective Psychotic Disorders With Common Mental Disorders Among Migrant Groups: A 25-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 2 Million Migrants.

Authors:  Kelly K Anderson; Britney Le; Jordan Edwards
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.