Literature DB >> 3339933

Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection.

R L Crumley1, M Lanser.   

Abstract

Previously described methods for quantifying nasal tip projection were evaluated. Fifty-one nasal profiles were analyzed and scored by expert rhinoplastic surgeons. The noses and faces were then evaluated quantitatively using several methods. The methods were found to vary widely in their correlation with the experts' subjective analyses. Several helpful relationships and guides were obtained: 1. Aesthetic tip projection does not correlate well with upper lip length. 2. A new method described in this paper showed the best correlation with the experts' opinions (regression, r value = 0.8132). This method related tip projection to total nasal length (including upper lip length). 3. The second new method tested in this report yielded helpful data by comparing tip projection with overall facial length. 4. After slight modification the method previously described by Goode proved useful as nasal length and desired tip projection formed a 3:4:5 right triangle.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3339933     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198802000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  17 in total

1.  The interdomal fat pad of the nose: a new anatomical structure.

Authors:  E Copcu; K Metin; Y Ozsunar; N Culhaci; S Ozkök
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Nasal Analysis and Anatomy: Anthropometric Proportional Assessment in Asians-Aesthetic Balance from Forehead to Chin, Part I.

Authors:  JeongHoon Suhk; JinSoo Park; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  'Universal retraction suture' for the overprojecting nasal tip.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous; Amanda Fanous; K Al-Sebeih; Valérie Côté
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

4.  Does the open rhinoplasty incision decrease nasal projection?

Authors:  Berna Uslu Coskun; Esra Sozen; Sureyya Seneldir; Ilknur Ozkaya; Omursen Yildirim; Arzu Yasemin Korkut; Burhan Dadas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Aging Differences in Ethnic Skin.

Authors:  Neelam A Vashi; Mayra Buainain de Castro Maymone; Roopal V Kundu
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2016-01

6.  Crushed Septal Cartilage-Covered Diced Cartilage Glue (CCDG) Graft: A Hybrid Technique of Crushed Septal Cartilage.

Authors:  Young-Ha Lee; Yoon Seok Choi; Chang Hoon Bae; Si-Youn Song; Yong-Dae Kim; Hyung Gyun Na
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Open rhinoplasty using a columellar strut: effects of the graft on nasal tip projection and rotation.

Authors:  S Bucher; S Kunz; M Deggeller; D Holzmann; M B Soyka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Transfixion incision as an initial technique in nasal tip deprojection.

Authors:  Philip Solomon; Richard Rival; Aimee Mabini; Jennifer Boyd
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

9.  The comparison between two different combinations of alar cartilage-modifying techniques: is lateral crural steal the choice?

Authors:  Ali Ghazipour; Saber Ghadakzadeh; Negar Karimian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The effectiveness of modified vertical dome division technique in reducing nasal tip projection in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Behrooz Gandomi; Mohammad Hossein Arzaghi; Mohammad Rafatbakhsh
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.