Literature DB >> 33399292

Diagnosis and treatment of flexible flatfoot: results of 2019 flexible flatfoot survey from the European Paediatric Orthopedic Society.

Vito Pavone1, Gianluca Testa, Andrea Vescio, Thomas Wirth, Antonio Andreacchio, Franck Accadbled, Federico Canavese.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate flexible flatfoot (FFF) diagnostic and current therapeutic modalities, as well as treatment expectations, among members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). A 59-questions survey on FFF diagnosis and treatment preferences was distributed to EPOS members. The survey consisted of six sections (1) general clinical parameters; (2) foot aspects; (3) X-ray angles (or lines); (4) expectations; (5) standard clinical assessment; and (6) management options. Descriptive statistics were performed. A total of 93 responses were analysed. In general, clinical parameters, age (91.4% of cases), laxity (81.7%), diffuse pain (84.9%), and pain at the ankle joint (81.7%) were rated as 'average' and 'crucial importance' by the vast majority of respondents. Meary's angle (47.3% of cases), talonavicular coverage (35.5%), and lateral talocalcaneal angle (35.5%) were assessed as main radiological tools in the FFF evaluation. Among respondents, 61.3% rated 'improved ability to walk longer without symptoms' as of 'crucial importance'. Eighty-two percent of the respondents felt less than 10% of patients with FFF are candidates for corrective surgery. Arthroereisis (29.3%) was the most common surgical procedure (16.4% for subtalar and 12.9% for extra-articular arthroereisis, respectively), followed by lateral column lengthening (17.9%) and medializing calcaneal osteotomy (12.3%). There is great variation among respondents in diagnostic and treatment preferences in the management of children with FFF. The results of the EPOS 2019 FFF survey clearly show that large-scale, multicentric, international studies are necessary to elucidate which diagnostic and treatment practices lead to the best outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33399292     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

1.  Current trends in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: Results of a survey of the members of European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society.

Authors:  Vito Pavone; Andrea Vescio; Franck Accadbled; Antonio Andreacchio; Thomas Wirth; Gianluca Testa; Federico Canavese
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.917

2.  Analysis of factors influencing improvement of idiopathic flatfoot.

Authors:  Byung-Joon Shin; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; Ki Hyuk Sung; Dong-Il Chun; Chang Hwa Hong; Jun Bum Kim; Sai-Won Kwon; Woo Jong Kim; Min Gon Song; Sung Joon Yoon; Ki Jin Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Subtalar Arthroereisis for Flexible Flatfoot in Children-Clinical, Radiographic and Pedobarographic Outcome Comparing Three Different Methods.

Authors:  Bjoern Vogt; Gregor Toporowski; Georg Gosheger; Jan Duedal Rölfing; Dieter Rosenbaum; Frank Schiedel; Andrea Laufer; Marie-Theres Kleine-Koenig; Christoph Theil; Robert Roedl; Adrien Frommer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  HyProCure for Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot: What Affects the Outcome.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; JianTao Jiang; ShaoLing Fu; Cheng Wang; Yan Su; GuoHua Mei; JianFeng Xue; Jian Zou; XueQian Li; ZhongMin Shi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Treatment for Flexible Flatfoot in Children With Subtalar Arthroereisis and Soft Tissue Procedures.

Authors:  Bing Li; Wenbao He; Guangrong Yu; Haichao Zhou; Jiang Xia; Youguang Zhao; Hui Zhu; Tao Yu; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Arthroereisis in juvenile flexible flatfoot: Which device should we implant? A systematic review of literature published in the last 5 years.

Authors:  Andrea Vescio; Gianluca Testa; Mirko Amico; Claudio Lizzio; Marco Sapienza; Piero Pavone; Vito Pavone
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.