Literature DB >> 33399086

Clinical and molecular practice of European thoracic pathology laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. The past and the near future.

P Hofman1, M Ilié2, E Chamorey3, P Brest4, R Schiappa3, V Nakache2, M Antoine5, M Barberis6, H Begueret7, F Bibeau8, C Bonnetaud2, P Boström9, P Brousset10, L Bubendorf11, L Carvalho12, G Cathomas13, A Cazes14, L Chalabreysse15, M-P Chenard16, M-C Copin17, J-F Côté18, D Damotte19, L de Leval20, P Delongova21, V Thomas de Montpreville22, A de Muret23, A Dema24, W Dietmaier25, M Evert25, A Fabre26, F Forest27, A Foulet28, S Garcia29, M Garcia-Martos30, L Gibault31, G Gorkiewicz32, D Jonigk33, J Gosney34, A Hofman2, I Kern35, K Kerr36, M Kossai37, M Kriegsmann38, S Lassalle2, E Long-Mira2, A Lupo19, A Mamilos25, R Matěj39, J Meilleroux10, C Ortiz-Villalón40, L Panico41, A Panizo42, M Papotti43, P Pauwels44, G Pelosi45, F Penault-Llorca37, O Pop46, N Poté14, S R Y Cajal47, J-C Sabourin48, I Salmon49, M Sajin50, S Savic-Prince11, H-U Schildhaus51, P Schirmacher38, I Serre52, E Shaw53, D Sizaret23, A Stenzinger38, J Stojsic54, E Thunnissen55, W Timens56, G Troncone57, C Werlein33, H Wolff58, J-P Berthet59, J Benzaquen60, C-H Marquette60, V Hofman2, F Calabrese61.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the consequences in Europe of the COVID-19 outbreak on pathology laboratories orientated toward the diagnosis of thoracic diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to 71 pathology laboratories from 21 European countries. The questionnaire requested information concerning the organization of biosafety, the clinical and molecular pathology, the biobanking, the workload, the associated research into COVID-19, and the organization of education and training during the COVID-19 crisis, from 15 March to 31 May 2020, compared with the same period in 2019.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 53/71 (75%) laboratories from 18 European countries. The biosafety procedures were heterogeneous. The workload in clinical and molecular pathology decreased dramatically by 31% (range, 3%-55%) and 26% (range, 7%-62%), respectively. According to the professional category, between 28% and 41% of the staff members were not present in the laboratories but did teleworking. A total of 70% of the laboratories developed virtual meetings for the training of residents and junior pathologists. During the period of study, none of the staff members with confirmed COVID-19 became infected as a result of handling samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on most of the European pathology laboratories included in this study. Urgent implementation of several changes to the organization of most of these laboratories, notably to better harmonize biosafety procedures, was noted at the onset of the pandemic and maintained in the event of a new wave of infection occurring in Europe.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; activity; biosafety; lung cancer; pathology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33399086     DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESMO Open        ISSN: 2059-7029


  2 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic pathology in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M L F van Velthuysen; S van Eeden; S le Cessie; M de Boer; H van Boven; B M Koomen; F Roozekrans; J Bart; W Timens; Q J M Voorham
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Differences in the Impact of COVID-19 on Pathology Laboratories and Cancer Diagnosis in Girona.

Authors:  Arantza Sanvisens; Montse Puigdemont; Jordi Rubió-Casadevall; Anna Vidal-Vila; Eugeni López-Bonet; Ferran Martín-Romero; Rafael Marcos-Gragera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.