Anna B Moberg1,2, Anna Ravell Jensen2,3, Jakob Paues4, Falk Magnus1,2. 1. Kärna Primary Healthcare Centre, Linköping, Sweden. 2. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 3. Kungsgatan Primary Healthcare Centre, Linköping, Sweden. 4. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner's degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate to what extent the physician's degree of suspicion is affected by the CRP level when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected in primary care. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at five primary health care centres in Sweden between October 2015 and December 2017. Adult patients (n = 266) consulting their health care centre with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection, where the physician suspected pneumonia, were included consecutively. Anamnestic information and findings from clinical examination were documented in a case report form. All patients were tested for CRP. The physicians rated their degree of suspicion as 'unsure,' 'quite sure,' and 'sure' before and after the CRP result. RESULTS: The degree of suspicion of pneumonia changed in 69% of the cases; most often to a lower degree (40%). In 28% of the cases, there was no longer any suspicion of pneumonia after CRP. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that CRP testing highly influences the physician's degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care and that it seems to be of most value when not sure of the diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner's degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate to what extent the physician's degree of suspicion is affected by the CRP level when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected in primary care. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at five primary health care centres in Sweden between October 2015 and December 2017. Adult patients (n = 266) consulting their health care centre with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection, where the physician suspected pneumonia, were included consecutively. Anamnestic information and findings from clinical examination were documented in a case report form. All patients were tested for CRP. The physicians rated their degree of suspicion as 'unsure,' 'quite sure,' and 'sure' before and after the CRP result. RESULTS: The degree of suspicion of pneumonia changed in 69% of the cases; most often to a lower degree (40%). In 28% of the cases, there was no longer any suspicion of pneumonia after CRP. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that CRP testing highly influences the physician's degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care and that it seems to be of most value when not sure of the diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
C-reactive protein; Community-acquired pneumonia; general practice; point of care tests; primary health care
Authors: Margaretha C Minnaard; Alma C van de Pol; Joris A H de Groot; Niek J De Wit; Rogier M Hopstaken; Sanne van Delft; Herman Goossens; Margareta Ieven; Christine Lammens; Paul Little; Chris C Butler; Berna D L Broekhuizen; Theo J M Verheij Journal: Scand J Clin Lab Invest Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 1.713
Authors: C Cillóniz; S Ewig; E Polverino; C Muñoz-Almagro; F Marco; A Gabarrús; R Menéndez; J Mensa; A Torres Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Kristin Alise Jakobsen; Hasse Melbye; Mark J Kelly; Christina Ceynowa; Sigvard Mölstad; Kerenza Hood; Christopher C Butler Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Paul Little; Beth Stuart; Nick Francis; Elaine Douglas; Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Sibyl Anthierens; Jochen W L Cals; Hasse Melbye; Miriam Santer; Michael Moore; Samuel Coenen; Chris Butler; Kerenza Hood; Mark Kelly; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Artur Mierzecki; Antoni Torres; Carl Llor; Melanie Davies; Mark Mullee; Gilly O'Reilly; Alike van der Velden; Adam W A Geraghty; Herman Goossens; Theo Verheij; Lucy Yardley Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alike W van der Velden; Alma C van de Pol; Emily Bongard; Daniela Cianci; Rune Aabenhus; Anca Balan; Femke Böhmer; Valerija Bralić Lang; Pascale Bruno; Slawomir Chlabicz; Samuel Coenen; Annelies Colliers; Ana García-Sangenís; Hrachuhi Ghazaryan; Maciej Godycki-Ćwirko; Siri Jensen; Christos Lionis; Sanne R van der Linde; Lile Malania; Jozsef Pauer; Angela Tomacinschii; Akke Vellinga; Ihor Zastavnyy; Susanne Emmerich; Adam Zerda; Theo J Verheij; Herman Goossens; Christopher C Butler Journal: BJGP Open Date: 2022-08-30