| Literature DB >> 33398237 |
Tanveer A Tabish1, Roger J Narayan2, Mohan Edirisinghe3.
Abstract
From the 1918 influenza pandemic (H1N1) until the recent 2019 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, no efficient diagnostic tools have been developed for sensitive identification of viral pathogens. Rigorous, early, and accurate detection of viral pathogens is not only linked to preventing transmission but also to timely treatment and monitoring of drug resistance. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the gold standard method for microbiology and virology testing, suffers from both false-negative and false-positive results arising from the detection limit, contamination of samples/templates, exponential DNA amplification, and variation of viral ribonucleic acid sequences within a single individual during the course of the infection. Rapid, sensitive, and label-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 can provide a first line of defense against the current pandemic. A promising technique is non-linear coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy, which has the ability to capture rich spatiotemporal structural and functional information at a high acquisition speed in a label-free manner from a biological system. Raman scattering is a process in which the distinctive spectral signatures associated with light-sample interaction provide information on the chemical composition of the sample. In this prospective, we briefly discuss the development and future prospects of CARS for real-time multiplexed label-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens. © The Materials Research Society 2020.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33398237 PMCID: PMC7773019 DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2020.81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MRS Commun Impact factor: 2.566
Comparison of molecular and immunological diagnostic methods to detect SARS-CoV-2.
| Technique | Sample source | Assay time | Sensitivity | Temperature | Limitations | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | Swab | 2–4 h | 95% | Thermal cycling | Expensive and time-consuming | [ |
| Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) | Throat swabs in the case of LAMP; while nasopharyngeal aspirates in the case of RT-LAMP | 15–60 min | 99% | 60–65 °C | Time-consuming, expensive, difficulty associated with the design of appropriate primers, false-positive results, and low throughput | [ |
| Immunoassay methods to detect viral antigens (e.g., ELISA) | Serum | 3–5 h | 99% | Ambient | Time-consuming, limitation of detection of antigen, vulnerable to contamination and false-positive results | [ |
| Immunoassay methods to detect antibodies (e.g., ELISA) | Serum | 3–5 h | 67–98% | Ambient | Expensive and antibody instability | [ |
| Next-generation sequencing | Blood, respiratory samples, and fluid | — | — | Ambient | Time-consuming, expensive, and requirement for technical expertise | [ |
Figure 1An illustration showing the energy levels of spontaneous and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS). In spontaneous Raman scattering, incoherent emission is triggered by the interaction of the pump with the molecule while in CARS, and coherent emission is mediated by the interaction between the pump and Stokes beams with the molecule. A four-wave mixing non-linear process of CARS uses two pulsed lasers (pump and probe) of frequencies ωp and ωpr mixed with a Stokes frequency ωs to coherently excite the molecule and create an anti-Stokes field of frequency ωas = ωp−ωs + ωpr.
Figure 2(a) Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy image of tumor tissue. (b) CARS image representing the tumor-containing region, which is located by the dotted lines in (a). (c) Keratinizing tumor. (d) Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumor nest. The tumor cells can be discerned from the embedding dermal tissue. (e) Tumor cells with pleomorphic nuclei. (f) Keratin pearl. (g) SCC cells. The white arrow points towards a nucleus, which appeared dark in CARS. Compared with noncancerous tissue, the tumorous tissue possesses an increased cell density, larger nuclei, and an elevated nuclear cytoplasm ratio. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40] — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.