Literature DB >> 33397623

Impact of DNA extraction and sampling methods on bacterial communities monitored by 16S rDNA metabarcoding in cold-smoked salmon and processing plant surfaces.

Aurélien Maillet1, Agnès Bouju-Albert2, Steven Roblin3, Pauline Vaissié3, Sébastien Leuillet3, Xavier Dousset2, Emmanuel Jaffrès2, Jérôme Combrisson3, Hervé Prévost4.   

Abstract

Amplicon sequencing approaches have been widely used in food bacterial ecology. However, choices regarding the methodology can bias results. In this study, bacterial communities associated with cold-smoked salmon products and their processing plant surfaces were monitored via sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The impact of DNA extraction protocols, sampling methods (swabbing or sponging) and surface materials on bacterial communities were investigated. α and β diversity analyses revealed that DNA extraction methods mainly influence the observed cold-smoked salmon microbiota composition. Moreover, different DNA extraction methods revealed significant differences in observed community richness and evenness. β-Proteobacteria: Photobacterium, Serratia and Firmicutes: Brochothrix, Carnobacterium and Staphylococcus were identified as the dominant genera. Surface microbiota richness, diversity and composition were mainly affected by cleaning and disinfection procedures but not by DNA extraction methods. Surface community richness and evenness appeared higher when sampled by sponging compared to swabbing. β-diversity analyses highlighted that surface topology, cleaning and disinfection and sampling devices seemed to affect the bacterial community composition. The dominant surface bacteria identified were mainly Flavobacteriaceae, β-Proteobacteria and γ-Proteobacteria described as fish spoilers such as Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Shewanella. DNA extraction and sampling methods can have an impact on sequencing results and the ecological analysis of bacterial community structures. This study confirmed the importance of methodology standardization and the need for analytical validation before 16S rDNA metabarcoding surveys.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; Bacteria; Food safety; Food spoilage; Microbiota; Processing plant; Smoked salmon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33397623     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  3 in total

1.  Metagenomic Analysis of Microbial Composition Revealed Cross-Contamination Pathway of Bacteria at a Foodservice Facility.

Authors:  Eun Seob Lim; Jin Ju Kim; Woo Jun Sul; Joo-Sung Kim; Bomin Kim; Hun Kim; Ok Kyung Koo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Volatile Organic Compounds and 16S Metabarcoding in Ice-Stored Red Seabream Pagrus major.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Anagnostopoulos; Foteini F Parlapani; Athanasios Mallouchos; Aikaterini Angelidou; Faidra Syropoulou; George Minos; Ioannis S Boziaris
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-24

3.  Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast.

Authors:  Annika Flint; Anna Laidlaw; Leo Li; Courtney Raitt; Mary Rao; Ashley Cooper; Kelly Weedmark; Catherine Carrillo; Sandeep Tamber
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.465

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.