Literature DB >> 3339759

Intratumor injection as a more effective means of porphyrin administration for photodynamic therapy.

T Amano1, G R Prout, C W Lin.   

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) as the photosensitizer is a promising new cancer treatment. The major drawback of this procedure is the resulting skin photosensitivity. Patients must remain in subdued light for four to six weeks to avoid cutaneous phototoxicity. In this study, we examine the possibility of reducing the skin photosensitization while maintaining the tumor phototoxic effect by administering the drug directly into the tumor. A subcutaneously implanted mouse bladder tumor (MBT-2) was used. HpD was administered either intraperitoneally (I.P.; 20 mg./kg. b.w.) or by intratumor injection (I.T.; 0.4 mg./cc tumor). The concentrations of HpD in tumor and various tissues (skin, muscle, liver, spleen, kidney, bladder and whole blood) were analyzed at various times after the injection, by 3H-HpD method and by a fluorometric method. Results indicated that at three to 96 hours after the administration, porphyrin levels in tumor were about three to 15 times higher by I.T. than by I.P. injection, while the concentrations in skin and other tissues were 1.3 to 10 times lower. Consequently, at 24 hours after injection ratios between tumor to skin porphyrin were 14 to 92 times higher for I.T. than I.P. injection. Higher porphyrin levels in tumor and lower in normal tissues would indicate lower skin photosensitivity, systemic cytotoxicity and possible greater tumor photosensitivity. This method of porphyrin administration may be useful for the PDT of certain single lesions that are accessible for direct injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3339759     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42441-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Intratumor administration of the photosensitizer pc 4 affords photodynamic therapy efficacy and selectivity at short drug-light intervals.

Authors:  Thomas H Foster; Benjamin R Giesselman; Rui Hu; Malcolm E Kenney; Soumya Mitra
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.243

2.  Macrophage-targeted photosensitizer conjugate delivered by intratumoral injection.

Authors:  Florencia Anatelli; Pawel Mroz; Qingde Liu; Changming Yang; Ana P Castano; Emilia Swietlik; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Single continuous wave laser induced photodynamic/plasmonic photothermal therapy using photosensitizer-functionalized gold nanostars.

Authors:  Shouju Wang; Peng Huang; Liming Nie; Ruijun Xing; Dingbin Liu; Zhe Wang; Jing Lin; Shouhui Chen; Gang Niu; Guangming Lu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Intratumoural administration of cisplatin in slow-release devices: II. Pharmacokinetics and intratumoural distribution.

Authors:  M J Deurloo; W Kop; O van Tellingen; H Bartelink; A C Begg
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Local hypoxia is produced at sites of intratumour injection.

Authors:  P L Olive; C-M Luo; J P Banáth
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Size-Dependent Drug Loading, Gene Complexation, Cell Uptake, and Transfection of a Novel Dendron-Lipid Nanoparticle for Drug/Gene Co-delivery.

Authors:  Ashita Nair; Jiyoon Bu; Jason Bugno; Piper A Rawding; Luke J Kubiatowicz; Woo-Jin Jeong; Seungpyo Hong
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.978

7.  Photodynamic cell killing effects and acute skin photosensitivity of aluminum-chloro-tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine and hematoporphyrin derivative.

Authors:  K Komatsu
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.