Hanna Lu1,2, Jing Li3, Li Zhang4, Sandra Sau Man Chan3, Linda Chiu Wa Lam3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Multi-Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, G/F, China. hannalu@cuhk.edu.hk. 2. The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. hannalu@cuhk.edu.hk. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Multi-Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, G/F, China. 4. Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial current stimulation in rehabilitation is a fast-growing field featured with computational and biophysical modeling. Cortical features and scalp-to-cortex distance (SCD) are key variables for determining the strength and distribution of the electric field, yet longitudinal studies able to capture these dynamic changes are missing. We sought to investigate and quantify the ageing effect on the morphometry and SCD of left primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in normal ageing adults and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) converters. METHODS: Baseline, 1-year and 3-year follow-up structural magnetic resonance imaging scans from normal ageing adults (n = 32), and MCI converters (n = 22) were drawn from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies. We quantified the changes of the cortical features and SCDs of left M1 and DLPFC, including grey matter volume, white matter volume, cortical thickness, and folding. Head model was developed to simulate the impact of SCD on the electric field induced by transcranial current stimulation. RESULTS: Pronounced ageing effect was found on the SCD of left DLPFC in MCI converters. The SCD change of left DLPFC from baseline to 3-year follow-up demonstrated better performance to discriminate MCI converters from normal ageing adults than the other morphometric measures. The strength of electric field was consequently decreased with SCD in MCI converters. CONCLUSION: Ageing has a prominent, but differential effect on the region-specific SCD and cortical features in older adults with cognitive impairments. Our findings suggest that SCD, cortical thickness, and folding of the targeted regions could be used as valuable imaging markers when conducting transcranial brain stimulation in individuals with brain atrophy.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial current stimulation in rehabilitation is a fast-growing field featured with computational and biophysical modeling. Cortical features and scalp-to-cortex distance (SCD) are key variables for determining the strength and distribution of the electric field, yet longitudinal studies able to capture these dynamic changes are missing. We sought to investigate and quantify the ageing effect on the morphometry and SCD of left primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in normal ageing adults and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) converters. METHODS: Baseline, 1-year and 3-year follow-up structural magnetic resonance imaging scans from normal ageing adults (n = 32), and MCI converters (n = 22) were drawn from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies. We quantified the changes of the cortical features and SCDs of left M1 and DLPFC, including grey matter volume, white matter volume, cortical thickness, and folding. Head model was developed to simulate the impact of SCD on the electric field induced by transcranial current stimulation. RESULTS: Pronounced ageing effect was found on the SCD of left DLPFC in MCI converters. The SCD change of left DLPFC from baseline to 3-year follow-up demonstrated better performance to discriminate MCI converters from normal ageing adults than the other morphometric measures. The strength of electric field was consequently decreased with SCD in MCI converters. CONCLUSION: Ageing has a prominent, but differential effect on the region-specific SCD and cortical features in older adults with cognitive impairments. Our findings suggest that SCD, cortical thickness, and folding of the targeted regions could be used as valuable imaging markers when conducting transcranial brain stimulation in individuals with brain atrophy.
Authors: Madhav Thambisetty; Jing Wan; Aaron Carass; Yang An; Jerry L Prince; Susan M Resnick Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-02 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anders M Fjell; Lars T Westlye; Inge Amlien; Thomas Espeseth; Ivar Reinvang; Naftali Raz; Ingrid Agartz; David H Salat; Doug N Greve; Bruce Fischl; Anders M Dale; Kristine B Walhovd Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: N Raz; F M Gunning; D Head; J H Dupuis; J McQuain; S D Briggs; W J Loken; A E Thornton; J D Acker Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 1997 Apr-May Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Matthew P White; Michael D Greicius; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: F Cendes; F Andermann; P Gloor; A Evans; M Jones-Gotman; C Watson; D Melanson; A Olivier; T Peters; I Lopes-Cendes Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dara L Dickstein; Doron Kabaso; Anne B Rocher; Jennifer I Luebke; Susan L Wearne; Patrick R Hof Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Gwenaëlle Douaud; Adrian R Groves; Christian K Tamnes; Lars Tjelta Westlye; Eugene P Duff; Andreas Engvig; Kristine B Walhovd; Anthony James; Achim Gass; Andreas U Monsch; Paul M Matthews; Anders M Fjell; Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 11.205