The dietary practices and beliefs of British South Asian people living with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter study from the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Epidemiological associations have implicated factors associated with Westernization, including the Western diet, in the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The role of diet in IBD etiopathogenesis, disease control and symptom management remains incompletely understood. Few studies have collected data on the dietary habits of immigrant populations living with IBD. Our aim was to describe the dietary practices and beliefs of British South Asians with IBD.
METHODS: A 30-item questionnaire was developed and consecutively administered to 255 British South Asians with IBD attending gastroenterology clinics in the United Kingdom.
RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of participants believed diet was the initiating factor for their IBD and 63% felt diet had previously triggered disease relapse. Eighty-nine percent avoided certain dietary items in the belief that this would prevent relapse. The most commonly avoided foods and drinks were spicy and fatty foods, carbonated drinks, milk products, alcohol, coffee, and red meat. A third of patients had tried a whole food exclusion diet, most commonly lactose- or gluten-free, and this was most frequently reported amongst those with clinically active IBD (P= 0.02). Almost 60% of participants avoided eating the same menu as their family, or eating out, at least sometimes, to prevent IBD relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: British South Asians with IBD demonstrate significant dietary beliefs and food avoidance behaviors with increased frequency compared to those reported in Caucasian IBD populations. Studies in immigrant populations may offer valuable insights into the interaction between diet, Westernization and cultural drift in IBD pathogenesis and symptomatology.

INTRODUCTION

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing-remitting, inflammatory conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract [1]. The etiopathogenesis of IBD remains incompletely understood but it is generally accepted that these conditions develop as a result of environmental factors acting in a genetically susceptible individual resulting in an aberrant immune response involving the host gut microbiome [2]. The environmental factors at play, of which many are postulated, remain particularly poorly understood [3].

Epidemiological studies demonstrate that IBD has become a global phenomenon, with a rising incidence in newly industrialized countries as well as in migrants and their offspring who emigrate from countries of low IBD prevalence into countries of high prevalence [4-9]. As such, environmental factors associated with increasing Westernization such as the “Western diet,” high in saturated fats, processed foods, animal protein, refined sugar and low in fiber, fresh fruit and vegetables, have been implicated in IBD development [10].

Diet is of particular interest to people with IBD, not least because nutrition is essential to life, but also due to the integral role eating plays in socializing with family and friends. This inevitably leads them to gravitate to diet and food in their consultations with clinicians, seeking to improve, control, or even “cure” IBD through diet [11,12]. Additionally, people with IBD may be at risk of nutritional deficiencies during periods of disease exacerbation (reduced oral intake, malabsorption, nutrient losses through the inflamed gut) and during remission [13-18].

Whilst diet is of great interest to those living with IBD, there remains a paucity of evidence-based dietary recommendations and advice from healthcare professionals is inevitably limited by a relative dearth of credible scientific data [19,20]. This fuels frustration due to perceived clinician indifference, leading those living with IBD to seek information from other sources to address their unmet needs [11,21-23]. The lack of clear dietary advice can result in self-imposed dietary restriction in this group, putting individuals with IBD at further increased risk of nutritional deficiency and impacting on psychosocial wellbeing [11,13,24,25].

A number of studies have shown a high frequency of dietary avoidance amongst IBD patients as well as varying beliefs regarding the role of diet in their disease [11,26-29]. A UK-based survey of unselected IBD patients observed that patients described strong beliefs pertaining to the role of dietary intake in IBD initiation and subsequent risk of relapse [11]. Of interest, British South Asians appeared to hold stronger views with regard to diet and a higher level of consistency around dietary restriction and avoidance of eating out to prevent disease relapse than people of Caucasian heritage [11]. A major limitation of this observation, however, was that less than 10% of the study population was of South Asian ethnicity so no strong conclusions could be drawn with respect to ethnic differences. However, a similar study from India demonstrated a high frequency of dietary restriction amongst people with IBD suggesting this is not a geographical effect [30].

A number of religious and cultural practices impact upon South Asian dietary behavior. Hindus typically do not eat beef for religious reasons and Muslims do not eat pork, also for religious reasons. Vegetarianism is also widely prevalent as part of cultural practice among many people of Indian origin. However, studies indicate that a certain amount of dietary acculturation, that is, assimilation to new cultural practices, may occur following migration to Western countries [31]. Understanding the dietary habits and perceptions of immigrant populations with IBD may hold vital scientific clues enabling further insights into the complex interaction between diet, effect of migration and “Westernization,” and any drift from these traditional cultural practices. Despite this, there are limited data on the dietary habits of the immigrant South Asian population with IBD in the United Kingdom [7,11,32,33]. The primary aim of our study was to describe the dietary practices and beliefs of British South Asians with IBD. Our secondary aims were to report any significant predictors accounting for the variation observed in responses between people and to describe the information resources utilized by these patients to guide their dietary beliefs and food related behaviors.

METHODS

1. Questionnaire Development

A questionnaire was developed (adapted from our previous study), on the dietary practices and beliefs of British South Asian people living with IBD [11]. The questionnaire was reviewed by a hospital patient focus group involving British South Asian patients with IBD and then modified based on their suggestions. The finalized questionnaire consisted of 30 questions assessing demographics, disease characteristics, dietary beliefs and practices and the information resources utilized by these patients (Table 1, Supplementary Material 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Questionnaire Contents

Questions for research team:
	Q1. Disease: UC, CD or IBDU?
	Q2. Disease classification (Montreal classification)?
	Q3. Current medications for IBD?
	Q4. Latest investigations within the last 3 months (if performed)?
	Q5. Disease activity score: PRO2 for UC, HBI for CD.
Questions for participants:
	Q1. How many years ago were you diagnosed with IBD?
	Q2. Do you consider that diet is the initiating factor for IBD?
		-Q2-2. What is the source of this information?
	Q3. Have you had a relapse of IBD within the last 1 year?
	Q4. Do you consider that a dietary factor has ever triggered a relapse of your IBD?
		-Q4-2. Which food or drink do you think triggered the relapse?
	Q5. Do you consider that diet triggers a relapse of IBD?
	Q6. Do you avoid certain foods or drink to try and prevent relapse of IBD?
		-Q6-2. Which foods and drinks do you avoid and what are your sources of information for this (followed by list of dietary items A-M).
	Q7. Do you consider that consuming certain foods, drink or nutritional supplements can prevent a relapse of IBD?
	Q8. Do you actually consume certain foods, drink or nutritional supplements to prevent relapse of IBD?
		-Q8-2. Which foods, drink, nutritional supplements?
		-Q8-3. What are your sources of information for this?
	Q9. Do you consider that diet should differ between relapse and remission of IBD?
	Q10. Do you consider that the diet for preventing relapse of UC differs to that for CD?
	Q11. When you search for dietary recommendations, are you able to find specific advice for IBD?
		-Q11-2. What are your information resources?
	Q12. Do you avoid the same menu as other members of your family to prevent relapse of IBD?
	Q13. Do you avoid eating out for fear of causing a relapse of IBD?
	Q14. Have you tried any of these specific diets? (Followed by list of whole food exclusion diets)
	Q15. Are you male or female?
	Q16. Participant age?
	Q17. Height?
	Q18. Weight?
	Q19. In which country were you born?
		-Q19-1. If born in the UK, were your parents also born in the UK?
	Q20. With which South Asian ethnicity do you identify?
	Q21. Do you have any other medical conditions for which you need to avoid certain dietary items?
	Q22. Who do you live with?
	Q23. Do you work?
	Q24. Highest educational qualification?
	Q25. Do you feel limited in your choices of food or drink because of cost or income?

These are shortened versions of the actual questions. For the full version of the questions and answer options, as they appeared in the participant questionnaire, please refer to the supplementary material.

UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBDU, IBD unspecified; PRO2, patient reported outcome-2; HBI, Harvey Bradshaw Index.

2. Eligibility Criteria

Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 18 or above, had a diagnosis of IBD (confirmed by a combination of endoscopic, radiological, biochemical and histological investigations) and identified themselves as a belonging to an ethnicity originating in South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives, Sri Lanka, or Bhutan).

Patients were excluded if they had a history of intestinal resection surgery (those with a previous appendectomy were eligible), if they had a current malignancy (or had been treated for a malignancy within the last 5 years) or if they were currently pregnant.

3. Disease Phenotype and Activity

Disease phenotype was described using the Montreal classification [34]. Disease activity for UC was assessed using a validated patient reported outcome 2 (PRO2) and for CD, the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) was used [35,36]. A PRO2 score of ≤ 1 (including a rectal bleeding subscore of zero) and HBI ≤ 4 was used to define clinical remission.

4. Study Design

This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, descriptive study in the United Kingdom between March 2019 and March 2020. Recruitment centers were The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust in Greater Manchester, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust and Barts Health NHS Trust, London. These were selected on account of a high population density of people with South Asian heritage.

South Asian patients with IBD were consecutively recruited from the gastroenterology clinics at participating centers. Eligible, consenting patients were asked to complete the questionnaire whilst in the clinic. Each patient’s clinical disease activity was assessed and details of their medications and recent investigations were recorded by a member of the research team.

5. Statistical Analysis

We used IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) to perform statistical analysis with significance assessed at an α level of 0.05 (two sided). Descriptive statistics were used to define the patient population, disease characteristics and patterns of dietary behaviors and beliefs observed in this population. Seven potential predictors, namely, age, gender, IBD subtype, disease relapse in the previous 12 months, current disease activity, ethnicity and place of birth (UK vs. non-UK) were chosen as possible determinants for the variation observed in responses. Bivariate analysis was performed using Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables and the independent t-test for continuous variables. Where applicable, post hoc analysis was performed using the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between significant predictors and the outcome by means of odds ratios (OR) quoted with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

For the purpose of statistical analysis, only dietary avoidance for the perceived prevention of disease relapse was included when calculating results for patterns of dietary avoidance, rather than avoidance for other reasons such as vegetarianism or religion. The 7 ethnicity choices on the questionnaire were grouped into 4 categories, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and South Asian (other), due to the small numbers of patients in other South Asian groups.

6. Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval for the study was obtained in the United Kingdom from South West/Central Bristol Research Ethics Committee on March 4, 2019 (REC reference 19/SW/0035) and was adopted onto the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) portfolio (CPMS ID: 41127). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained.

RESULTS

1. Baseline Characteristics

Two hundred and fifty-five British South Asians with a diagnosis of IBD participated in the study. Further recruitment was planned but stopped in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, when all such studies were suspended or terminated across the UK.

Baseline participant demographics are summarized in Table 2. Mean age was 42 years and 52% were male. Fifty-four participants (21%) reported having another medical condition for which they needed to avoid certain food and drink such as diabetes mellitus (13%). Disease characteristics are summarized in Table 3. One hundred and fifty (59%) were in clinical remission at the time of recruitment (PRO2 ≤ 1 [with rectal bleeding subscore = 0] for UC and HBI ≤ 4 for CD). One hundred and forty-three (56%) reported having had a relapse of their IBD in the previous 12 months (relapse was defined as the presence of rectal bleeding with increased bowel habits for UC, and for CD, the presence of abdominal pain with or without increased bowel habits and rectal bleeding).

Table 2.

Participant Baseline Demographics

Variable	Value (n = 255)
Age (yr)	41.8 ± 14.8 (18–85)
Ratio of M:F	52:48
BMI (kg/m2)	25.3 ± 5.4
South Asian ethnicity
Indian	138 (54.1)
Pakistani	67 (26.3)
Bangladeshi	42 (16.5)
South Asian–other	7 (2.7)
Unspecified	1 (0.4)
Country of birth
UK	136 (53.3)
Non-UK	119 (46.7)
Living status
With family	237 (93.0)
Alone	11 (4.3)
With others	7 (2.7)
Highest level of educational qualification
None	5 (2.0)
High school exams (GCSEs/O-levels in UK)	53 (20.8)
College/6th form exams (A-levels in UK)	45 (17.6)
University degree	108 (42.4)
Other professional qualification (e.g., diploma)	35 (13.7)
Unspecified	9 (3.5)
Employment status
Full-time	123 (48.2)
Part-time	45 (17.6)
Unemployed	63 (24.7)
Retired	22 (8.6)
Unspecified	2 (0.8)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number (%).

M, male; F, female; BMI, body mass index; GCSE, General Certificate of Secondary Education; O-levels, ordinary levels; A-levels, advanced levels.

Table 3.

Participant IBD Specifics

Variable	Value (n = 255)
Disease duration (yr)	9.9 ± 8.7
IBD subtype and distribution
Ulcerative colitis	154 (60.4)
E1 (proctitis)	23 (9.0)
E2 (left sided disease)	70 (27.5)
E3 (extensive colitis)	61 (23.9)
Crohn’s disease	93 (36.5)
Ileal	18 (7.1)
Colonic	33 (12.9)
Ileocolonic	39 (15.3)
Unspecified	3 (1.2)
IBDU	8 (3.1)
Clinical disease activity (PRO2/HBI)
Clinical remission	150 (58.8)
Active disease	96 (37.6)
Unavailable	9 (3.5)
Disease relapse in previous 12 months	143 (56.1)
Medication
Oral 5-aminosalicylates	133 (52.2)
Immunomodulators (azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate)	89 (34.9)
Biologics (anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, ustekinumab)	85 (33.3)
Topical 5-aminosalicylates	19 (7.5)
Oral corticosteroids	13 (5.1)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBDU, IBD unspecified; PRO2, patient reported outcome-2; HBI, Harvey Bradshaw Index; TNFs, tumor necrosis factors.

2. Dietary Beliefs Regarding Disease Initiation and Control

Fifty-one percent of participants considered diet to be the initiating factor for their IBD. These beliefs did not vary based on IBD subtype, disease activity, ethnicity, age or any of the other potential predictors analyzed. One hundred and sixty-one (63%) believed dietary components had previously triggered a relapse of their IBD. Those who reported a disease relapse in the previous 12 months were significantly more likely to hold these beliefs (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17–3.36, P = 0.01). The most commonly self-identified dietary triggers for IBD relapse were spicy foods (74%), fatty foods (44%), red meat (42%), milk (42%), alcohol (35%), and coffee (32%).

3. Altered Dietary Practices for the Prevention of Disease Relapse

Two hundred and twenty-eight respondents (89%) reported avoiding certain foods or drinks, at least sometimes (27% “always avoid” and 63% “sometimes avoid”), holding a belief that this may help prevent a relapse of their IBD. The most commonly avoided dietary products across all participants (n = 255) were spicy foods (71%), fatty foods (58%), carbonated drinks (51%), milk products (49%), alcohol (47%), coffee (47%), red meat (42%), sweet foods (33%), and raw fruit and vegetables (30%).

There were no significant predictors accounting for the variation seen in responses for general food avoidance. Females were identified as avoiding significantly more dietary products, on average, than males (4.3 vs. 5.2, P = 0.02). Females were significantly more likely to avoid raw fruit and vegetables (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.04–3.06; P = 0.04) and sweet foods (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.48–4.33; P = 0.001). There were no significant gender differences in food avoidance amongst other food and drink categories (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Gender differences in frequency of food avoidance amongst British South Asians with inflammatory bowel disease.

Avoidance of fatty foods (P = 0.002) and alcohol (P = 0.006) were found to vary significantly depending on South Asian ethnicity with Bangladeshi participants most likely to avoid fatty foods (P = 0.004) and Indian participants most likely to avoid alcohol (P < 0.001) for the purposes of IBD relapse avoidance (Supplementary Fig. 1). Those who were not born in the United Kingdom (n = 119) were significantly more likely to avoid white meat (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.54–6.59; P = 0.002), fish (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.27–5.86; P = 0.01) and alcohol (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.73; P = 0.05) in order to prevent a disease relapse. No significant differences were found between UC and CD patients, or between active and inactive disease, across all dietary subgroups. Participants with a co-existing medical condition (21%) requiring them to make dietary modifications were not found to be significantly more likely to avoid dietary components specifically for the purposes of IBD relapse prevention (P = 0.85).

Just over half (52%) believed that consuming certain foods, drinks or nutritional supplements could prevent a relapse of their IBD, however only 39% reported actually consuming these products. The most commonly consumed items were turmeric products in 10% and probiotics in 7%. The details of other foods, drinks and nutritional supplements, consumed by patients to prevent disease relapse, are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Dietary Components Consumed to Prevent Inflammatory Bowel Disease Relapse

Food/drink/supplement consumed	Frequency (%)
Turmeric products	26 (10.2)
Probiotics	17 (6.7)
Oily fish/omega 3 supplements	10 (3.9)
Fruit and vegetables	10 (3.9)
Yogurt	9 (3.5)
Specific types of water	8 (3.1)
Vitamin D supplements	6 (2.4)
Multivitamins	6 (2.4)
Bland/plain/white foods (e.g., rice, bread, potatoes)	5 (2.0)
Honey	5 (2.0)

4. The Use of Whole Food Exclusion Diets

A third (31%) reported having tried a specific whole food exclusion diet. The most common among these was a lactose-free diet (21%) followed by a gluten-free diet (14%), low FODMAPs (Fermentable Oligo-, Di- and Monosaccharides and Polyols) diet (5%), specific carbohydrate diet (3.2%), anti-inflammatory diet (3.6%), and a Paleolithic diet (2%). Twelve percent reported having tried more than one of these diets. Ethnic differences in the use of whole food exclusion diets are shown in Fig. 2. Those with clinically active IBD were more likely to have tried a whole food exclusion diet (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.13–3.37; P = 0.02).

Fig. 2.

The use of whole food exclusion diets amongst British South Asians living with inflammatory bowel disease. FODMAPs, Fermentable Oligo-, Di- and Monosaccharides and Polyols.

5. Psychosocial Impact

On analyzing the data regarding avoidance of the same menu as the rest of the family, only responses from those participants who reported living with their family (n = 237) were considered. One hundred and thirty-nine participants (59%) reported avoiding eating the same meal as their family, at least sometimes, to prevent a relapse of their IBD (16% “always avoid” and 43% “sometimes avoid”). A similar number (58%) avoided eating out for fear of causing a disease relapse (21% “always avoid” and 37% “sometimes avoid”). Just under a fifth (18%) reported feeling limited in their dietary choices because of cost or income but this did not significantly impact upon likelihood of dietary avoidance or beliefs about the role of diet in IBD initiation.

6. Information Resources

Of those who believe that diet is the initiating factor for IBD (n = 129), 95% based this on their own experience of the disease. The other most commonly used information resources guiding these beliefs are the internet (33%) and advice from healthcare professionals (34%) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Information Resources Utilized by British South Asian People Living with IBD

Information resource	Disease initiation (%)	Food/drink avoidance (%)	Food/drink/supplement use (%)
Patient’s own experience	94.6	81.7	73.0
Healthcare professional	34.1	18.7	30.0
Gastroenterologist	22.5	12.2	17.0
General practitioner	3.9	2.2	3.0
IBD clinical nurse specialist	14.0	4.3	4.0
Dietitian	14.0	9.9	12.0
Internet	33.3	14.6	40.0
Support organizations (e.g.,CCUK)	23.3	8.2	11.0
Other	18.6	10.6	35.0
Information leaflet/booklet	3.9	1.1	2.0
Information from other patients
UC	7.0	2.6	5.0
CD	7.0	2.6	7.0
Family	17.8	9.1	24.0
Friends	4.6	4.0	12.0
Social media	5.4	1.8	7.0
Television/radio	0.8	0.8	0
Newspapers/magazines	1.6	0.2	2.0

IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CCUK, Crohn's and Colitis UK; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease.

Those who avoid certain foods or drinks to avoid a “relapse” of their IBD (n = 228) were asked to provide details of the information resources used to guide these dietary practices (Table 5). Participants were encouraged to report all sources of information used and, as such, some individuals documented multiple resources. The majority based their decisions regarding dietary avoidance on their own experience with food (82%). Few reported using advice from healthcare professionals (19%), most commonly their gastroenterologist (12%) followed by a dietitian (10%) and IBD clinical nurse specialist (4%), as well as information found on the internet (15%) and advice from their family (9%).

When considering which foods, drinks or nutritional supplements were beneficial in preventing a disease relapse (n = 100) individuals relied on their own experience (73%), information from the internet (40%) and advice from healthcare professionals (30%) and family (24%). Only 11% of patients reported using internet-based patient support organizations, such as Crohn’s and Colitis UK (CCUK), to guide these dietary practices with 35% using other websites (Table 5).

Half of our participants (51%) reported being able to find specific advice regarding dietary recommendations for IBD. This information was most frequently sourced via the internet (65%) with only 17% specifically reporting the use of internet-based patient support organizations, such as CCUK, or NHS websites.

DISCUSSION

Few studies have examined the dietary practices and beliefs of people living with IBD and these have been conducted mainly in Western, predominantly Caucasian, populations with very limited data on immigrant South Asian populations [11,13,26-30,33,37]. This is the largest study to date reporting on dietary practices and beliefs of South Asian immigrant patients with IBD. The ethnic distribution of our participants (54% Indian, 36% Pakistani, and 17% Bangladeshi) is broadly in keeping with the distribution as recorded in the last UK Census in 2011 [38]. We observed frequent food avoidance and dietary beliefs, with a high level of consistency around perceived triggers, and often higher than noted in our own previously reported Caucasian population in which a similar study design and questionnaire were used [11].

It is important to note at the outset that this study concerns beliefs and perceptions, based on participants’ experiences, and is not asserting any biological or mechanistic underpinning, nor any causality. Many symptoms experienced by people with IBD are transient and functional in nature, but may be misinterpreted as a disease flare and are important to understand. It is anticipated that the interpretation of what constitutes a disease relapse will differ between our participants but the study is designed to focus on alterations in dietary habits based on patient perceived flares rather than proven inflammatory flares.

In our study, 51% of British South Asians who took part considered diet to be the initiating factor for their IBD. Whilst not directly comparable, these beliefs are broadly similar to those of the predominantly Caucasian IBD population in our prior study where 48% of 400 participants surveyed held similar beliefs [11]. Similarly, in the study by Tomar et al. [30] conducted in India, 44% of 316 individuals surveyed perceived dietary factors as a risk for the development of IBD.

One might expect perceptions with regard to the role of diet in disease initiation to be stronger in an immigrant population who may have shifted towards a more Westernized culture before being diagnosed with their IBD. If this were the case, it may also be expected that beliefs regarding the role of diet in the etiopathogenesis of IBD would be more extreme in those born outside of the UK and who have migrated in before their diagnosis. The finding that there is no difference in these beliefs in our study, depending on where participants were born, indicates that these cultural transitions may have less of an impact on beliefs pertaining to diet than might be anticipated.

A high proportion of our respondents reported avoidance of specific foods and drinks to prevent “relapse” with 89% of patients reporting dietary avoidance, at least sometimes. This high frequency of avoidance amongst South Asian people with IBD has been noted in other similar studies and, whilst not directly comparable, data indicates that food avoidance with the intention of preventing “relapse” may be more common among South Asian people living with IBD than it is in Caucasian patients [11,26,30]. The most commonly avoided food and drinks were spicy foods, fatty foods, carbonated drinks, milk products, alcohol, coffee, red meat, sweet foods and raw fruit and vegetables, similar to those reported in other studies [11,13,27,30,37,39].

The high frequency of avoidance of dairy products, coffee, and fruit and vegetables, all of which can contribute to abdominal symptoms in people without IBD, is suggestive of an overlap with functional gastrointestinal symptoms, such as irritable bowel syndrome [40]. Spicy foods, alcohol and others can cause symptoms in people with no gastrointestinal disorder at all [13]. A common denominator for symptom improvement with these approaches may be the reduced intake of FODMAPs that can induce symptoms through luminal distension and mechanoreceptor stimulation by virtue of osmotic effects and fermentability [41]. Thus, many may actually be reporting dietary avoidance in order to prevent unpleasant abdominal symptoms of a functional nature, perceiving this as a disease flare.

We found a high proportion of patients avoiding milk/milk products in our British South Asian IBD cohort compared to a previous study in a predominantly Caucasian population (49% vs. 15% in the Limdi et al. study) [11]. This may reflect the high prevalence of lactose intolerance in South Asians and avoidance may improve symptoms related to this rather than true IBD relapse [42,43]. Complete avoidance of dairy products, however, may raise clinical concern through placing patients at risk of calcium and vitamin D deficiency [11,13,24]. Avoidance of fruit and vegetables, amongst other dietary products, also carries risk of deficiency of essential vitamins, minerals and trace elements in a group who are already at risk of nutritional deficiency, particularly vitamin D [13,44,45]. The potential for irrational dietary exclusions to impact negatively on health cannot be underestimated and underpins the need for education and research on diet. Dietary counselling has been shown to be effective in managing and preventing nutritional deficiencies in IBD [15].

A high proportion of British South Asian participants reported avoiding eating the same meal as the rest of the family (59%) and eating out (58%), at least sometimes, in a belief this may prevent relapse of their IBD. Concerns such as toilet access may also play a role. This is a higher proportion than noted in the United Kingdom among Caucasians with IBD wherein 25% reported not sharing meals with the rest of the family and 22% avoided eating out [11]. Food intake and associated psychosocial behavior in IBD is also associated with lower quality of life scores [25]. Similarly, the living with inflammatory bowel disease: the experiences of adults of South Asian origin (LISA) project also reported difficulties with eating the same meal as the rest of the household and avoiding social events due to concern about triggering symptoms [32].

On review of the information resources utilized by patients to guide their dietary practices and beliefs it is notable that participants’ own experiences with food far outweigh information received from a healthcare professional or sourced on the internet. This is perhaps not surprising as clearly an individual is best placed to determine which foods exacerbate their symptoms and might be avoided. Beyond this, partakers reported that advice from a family member is used with almost the same frequency across all fields as advice from a gastroenterologist and more so than information received from a dietitian. This either means that clinicians are not providing adequate dietary advice to IBD patients generally or are failing to engage a specific population of people living with IBD who may already be at increased risk, or both. The LISA project highlighted similar issues, concluding that there was general need for greater information and advice on diet for the wider IBD population but that South Asian patients also needed more culturally specific dietary advice [31].

Furthermore, whilst the internet is frequently reported as a useful source of information for British South Asian IBD patients, the use of patient support organizations (e.g., CCUK) or NHS websites is reported relatively infrequently. This may reflect under-reporting as some patients who state using the internet as an information resource may not be more specific. The findings do however again echo the findings of the LISA report which found that knowledge and understanding of CCUK, as well as engagement with the support group, amongst the British South Asian community was typically very low [32]. The current study highlights the need to signpost the South Asian IBD community in the direction of credible sources of dietary information in order to avoid the potential risks involved with following non-evidenced based advice [22,23]. The infrequent reporting of social media as an information resource is of interest in today’s society and perhaps is something which could be targeted more [46].

Our study has a number of limitations. We surveyed an unselected cohort of IBD patients with varying levels of disease activity and it is plausible that individuals with clinically active or sub-clinical but active disease may have dietary beliefs based on current disease activity. There is also the risk of recall bias, an unavoidable issue in self-reported dietary experiences and prior disease “relapses.” We also acknowledge that some responses and perceptions are highly likely to be influenced by co-existing functional gut disorders with a very complex cause-effect relationship, but nonetheless influencing dietary beliefs and behaviors. Whilst our definition of UC relapse is fairly robust, involving rectal bleeding and increased stool frequency, we acknowledge that the definition used for self-reported CD relapse is more ambiguous, as are clinical activity scoring systems for CD in general. This may inevitably result in some participants reporting a previous disease relapse, or indeed clinically active disease, when symptoms may be more functional in nature. This is not seen as a limitation as the study was purposefully designed to collect data on participants’ dietary beliefs and practices based on patient perceived relapse.

In conclusion, this is the largest study reporting the dietary practices and beliefs of an immigrant population with IBD. British South Asians with IBD demonstrate significant dietary beliefs and food avoidance behaviors with a high level of consistency and more than previously reported in Caucasian people living with IBD. “Westernization” does not appear to have impacted upon beliefs pertaining to the role of diet in disease initiation but may play a role in altered food-related behaviors. Foods that can trigger unpleasant, functional gastrointestinal symptoms appear to be most commonly avoided along with fatty foods, red meat, carbonated drinks and sweet products, which may be associated with perpetuating intestinal inflammation.

As clinicians we need to ensure that we are providing culturally appropriate and competent IBD services and information resources. The experiences of immigrant populations and minority ethnic groups may hold vital clues which can serve to optimize dietary research in the future allowing us to gain better insight into the complexities surrounding diet, drift from traditional cultural practices, the generation of gastrointestinal symptoms and the propagation of overt inflammation.