Literature DB >> 33396747

Comparative Analysis Delineates the Transcriptional Resistance Mechanisms for Pod Borer Resistance in the Pigeonpea Wild Relative Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars.

Isaac Njaci1, Abigail Ngugi-Dawit2, Richard O Oduor3, Leah Kago1, Brett Williams2, Linh Thi My Hoang2, Sagadevan G Mundree2, Sita R Ghimire1.   

Abstract

Insect pests pose a serious threat to global food production. Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)) is one of the most destructive pests of leguminous crops. The use of host resistance has been an effective, environmentally friendly and sustainable approach for controlling several agricultural pests. The exploitation of natural variations in crop wild relatives could yield pest-resistant crop varieties. In this study, we used a high-throughput transcriptome profiling approach to investigate the defense mechanisms of susceptible cultivated and tolerant wild pigeonpea genotypes against H. armigera infestation. The wild genotype displayed elevated pest-induced gene expression, including the enhanced induction of phytohormone and calcium/calmodulin signaling, transcription factors, plant volatiles and secondary metabolite genes compared to the cultivated control. The biosynthetic and regulatory processes associated with flavonoids, terpenes and glucosinolate secondary metabolites showed higher accumulations in the wild genotype, suggesting the existence of distinct tolerance mechanisms. This study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying insect resistance in the wild pigeonpea genotype. This information highlights the indispensable role of crop wild relatives as a source of crucial genetic resources that could be important in devising strategies for crop improvement with enhanced pest resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cajanus scarabaeoides; Helicoverpa armigera; crop wild relatives; insect resistance; pigeonpea; pod borer; transcriptomics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33396747      PMCID: PMC7795875          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  46 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers.

Authors:  Rajeev K Varshney; Wenbin Chen; Yupeng Li; Arvind K Bharti; Rachit K Saxena; Jessica A Schlueter; Mark T A Donoghue; Sarwar Azam; Guangyi Fan; Adam M Whaley; Andrew D Farmer; Jaime Sheridan; Aiko Iwata; Reetu Tuteja; R Varma Penmetsa; Wei Wu; Hari D Upadhyaya; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Trushar Shah; K B Saxena; Todd Michael; W Richard McCombie; Bicheng Yang; Gengyun Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jun Wang; Charles Spillane; Douglas R Cook; Gregory D May; Xun Xu; Scott A Jackson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores.

Authors:  Jianqiang Wu; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 4.  A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors.

Authors:  Thomas Boller; Georg Felix
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 5.  Ca2+ signalling in plant immune response: from pattern recognition receptors to Ca2+ decoding mechanisms.

Authors:  Heike Seybold; Fabian Trempel; Stefanie Ranf; Dierk Scheel; Tina Romeis; Justin Lee
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Repressor- and activator-type ethylene response factors functioning in jasmonate signaling and disease resistance identified via a genome-wide screen of Arabidopsis transcription factor gene expression.

Authors:  Ken C McGrath; Bruno Dombrecht; John M Manners; Peer M Schenk; Cameron I Edgar; Donald J Maclean; Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible; Michael K Udvardi; Kemal Kazan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in arabidopsis.

Authors:  D E Brown; A M Rashotte; A S Murphy; J Normanly; B W Tague; W A Peer; L Taiz; G K Muday
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses.

Authors:  Rajendra Bari; Jonathan D G Jones
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Functional analysis of the Kunitz trypsin inhibitor family in poplar reveals biochemical diversity and multiplicity in defense against herbivores.

Authors:  Ian T Major; C Peter Constabel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Differential Contribution of Transcription Factors to Arabidopsis thaliana Defense Against Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Fabian Schweizer; Natacha Bodenhausen; Steve Lassueur; Frédéric G Masclaux; Philippe Reymond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  3 in total

1.  Plant Cell and Organism Development 2.0.

Authors:  Robert Hasterok; Alexander Betekhtin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Simple, Fast and Efficient Methods for Analysing the Structural, Ultrastructural and Cellular Components of the Cell Wall.

Authors:  Renan Falcioni; Thaise Moriwaki; Renato Herrig Furlanetto; Marcos Rafael Nanni; Werner Camargos Antunes
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  Comparative TMT Proteomic Analysis Unveils Unique Insights into Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) Resistance in Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars.

Authors:  Abigail Ngugi-Dawit; Isaac Njaci; Thomas J V Higgins; Brett Williams; Sita R Ghimire; Sagadevan G Mundree; Linh Thi My Hoang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.