| Literature DB >> 33396003 |
Luqi Cheng1, Xie Tang1, Chunxia Luo2, Daihong Liu3, Yuanchao Zhang4, Jiuquan Zhang5.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of both upper and lower motor neurons. Studies using metrics derived from the diffusion tensor model have documented decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased mean diffusivity in the corticospinal tract (CST) and the corpus callosum (CC) in ALS. These studies, however, only focused on microstructural white matter (WM) changes, while the macrostructural alterations of WM tracts in ALS remain unknown. Moreover, studies conducted based on the diffusion tensor model cannot provide information related to specific fiber bundles and fail to clarify which biological characteristics are changing. Using a novel fixel-based analytical method that can characterize the fiber density (FD) and the fiber-bundle cross-section (FC), this study investigated both microstructural and macrostructural changes in the WM in a large cohort of patients with ALS (N = 60) compared with demographically matched healthy controls (N = 60). Compared with healthy controls, we found decreased FD, FC and fiber density and cross-section (FDC, a combined measure of the FD and FC) values in the bilateral CST and the middle posterior body of the CC in patients with ALS, suggesting not only microstructural but also macrostructural abnormalities in these fiber bundles. Additionally, we found that the mean FD and FDC values in the bilateral CST were positively correlated with the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale, indicating that these two indices may serve as potential markers for assessing the clinical severity of ALS. Thus, these findings provide initial evidence for the existence of microstructural and macrostructural abnormalities of the fiber bundles in ALS.Entities:
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Corticospinal tract; Fiber density; Fiber-bundle cross-section; Fixel-based analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33396003 PMCID: PMC7724379 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects.
| ALS (N = 60) | HC (N = 60) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age in years (range) | 48.77(26–69) | 48.15(24–70) | 0.73 |
| Sex (male/female) | 39/21 | 39/21 | 1.00 |
| Mean disease duration in months (range) | 21.05(2–132) | – | – |
| Mean disease progression rate (range) | 1.36(0.02–6.50) | – | – |
| Mean ALSFRS-R (range) | 32.62(16–45) | – | – |
| MoCA score (range) | 27.38(26–30) | 27.63(26–30) | 0.29 |
| Limb/bulbar/both onset | 47/12/1 | – | – |
| Classic/UMN-D/LMN-D/PMA/PLS | 43/7/7/2/1 | – | – |
ALSFRS-R, Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment. HC: healthy controls
The ALS patients were subdivided into 5 phenotypes: classic, upper motor neuron dominant (UMN-D), lower motor neuron dominant (LMN-D), progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) and primary lateral sclerosis (PLS).
Fig. 1(A) A schematic showing a fiber bundle cross-section with changes of fiber density (FD), fiber bundle cross-section (FC) and fiber density and cross-section (FDC, a product of the FD and FC) values. Each blue circle represents the cross-section of an axon, the large gray circle represents the cross-section of a fiber bundle, and the grid represents imaging voxels. (B) Fiber-specific reductions in patients with ALS compared with healthy controls (HC). Streamline segments including streamlines that correspond to significant fixels (FWE-corrected p-value < 0.05) were cropped from the template tractogram. Streamlines were colored by percentage effect decrease in patients with ALS compared with HC for FD, FC and FDC. Significant streamlines were rendered on the population template. CST, the corticospinal tract; CC, the corpus callosum. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2White matter abnormalities from tract-of-interest fixel-based analysis (FBA) in patients with ALS compared with healthy controls. (A) Tracts including the bilateral corticospinal tracts (CST) and the corpus callosum (CC) identified in whole-brain FBA were rendered on the population template. (B) Mean fiber density (FD), fiber-bundle cross-section (FC), and fiber density and cross-section (FDC) values of the CC and the bilateral CST in patients with ALS and healthy controls (HC). The error bar indicates the standard error of the mean.
Fig. 3Positive correlation between the mean fiber density (FD) and fiber density and cross-section (FDC) of the bilateral corticospinal tracts (CST) and ALSFRS-R scores in patients with ALS. ALSFRS-R, ALS Functional Rating Scale.
Fig. 4Tract-of-interest white matter (WM) volumetric analysis. (A) Mean WM volume of the bilateral corticospinal tracts (CST) and the corpus callosum (CC) in patients with ALS and healthy controls (HC). The error bar indicates the standard error of the mean. (B) Correlation between FBA metrics and WM volume for the tracts in each group. FD, fiber density; FC, fiber-bundle cross-section; FDC, fiber density and cross-section.
The post hoc discriminant analysis between patients with ALS and healthy controls.
| FD | FC | FDC | FD + FC + FDC Enter method | FD + FC + FDC Stepwise method | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left corticospinal tract | |||||
| Wilks' Lambda | 0.737 | 0.874 | 0.739 | 0.701 | 0.703 |
| Sensitivity | 68.3% | 63.3% | 73.3% | 73.3% | 73.3% |
| Specificity | 76.7% | 68.3% | 75% | 83.3% | 80% |
| Accuracy | 72.5% | 65.8% | 74.2% | 78.3% | 76.7% |
| Right corticospinal tract | |||||
| Wilks' Lambda | 0.765 | 0.839 | 0.746 | 0.717 | 0.746 |
| Sensitivity | 71.7% | 68.3% | 71.7% | 70% | 71.7% |
| Specificity | 80% | 68.3% | 76.7% | 86.7% | 76.7% |
| Accuracy | 75.8% | 68.3% | 74.2% | 78.3% | 74.2% |
| Corpus callosum | |||||
| Wilks' Lambda | 0.774 | 0.919 | 0.824 | 0.749 | 0.774 |
| Sensitivity | 61.7% | 63.3% | 66.7% | 61.7% | 61.7% |
| Specificity | 68.3% | 66.7% | 70% | 75% | 68.3% |
| Accuracy | 65% | 65% | 68.3% | 68.3% | 65% |
FD, fiber density; FC, fiber bundle cross-section; FDC, fiber density and cross-section.