Literature DB >> 33395548

The Instagram Infodemic: Cobranding of Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Authority-Questioning Beliefs.

Emma K Quinn1,2,3, Sajjad S Fazel1,2, Cheryl E Peters1,2,4.   

Abstract

The novel coronavirus 2019 pandemic has brought about an overabundance of misinformation concerning the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) it causes spreading rapidly on social media. While some more obviously untrustworthy sources may be easier for social media filters to identify and remove, an early feature was the cobranding of COVID-19 misinformation with other types of misinformation. To examine this, the top 10 Instagram posts (in English) were collected every day for 10 days (April 21-30th, 2020) for each of the hashtags #hoax, #governmentlies, and #plandemic. The #hoax was selected first as it is commonly used in conspiracy theory posts, and #governmentlies because it was the most commonly cotagged with #hoax. For comparison, we selected #plandemic as the most popular cotagged hashtag that was clearly COVID-19-related. This resulted in 300 Instagram posts available for our analysis. We conducted a content analysis by coding the themes contained in the posts, both for the images and the text caption shared by the Instagram users (including hashtags). The broad theme of general mistrust was the most common, including the idea that the government and/or media has fabricated or hidden information pertaining to COVID-19. Conspiracy theories were the second-most frequent theme among posts. Overall, COVID-19 was frequently presented in association with authority-questioning beliefs. Developing an understanding of how the public shares misinformation on COVID-19 alongside conspiracy theories and authority-questioning statements can aid public health officials and policymakers in limiting the spread of potentially life-threatening health misinformation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; authority-questioning; cobranding; conspiracy; infodemic

Year:  2020        PMID: 33395548     DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mis-Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez; Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez; Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo; Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco; Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas; Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo; Álvaro Bustamante-Sánchez; José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valerie van Mulukom; Lotte J Pummerer; Sinan Alper; Hui Bai; Vladimíra Čavojová; Jessica Farias; Cameron S Kay; Ljiljana B Lazarevic; Emilio J C Lobato; Gaëlle Marinthe; Irena Pavela Banai; Jakub Šrol; Iris Žeželj
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Medical Mistrust and Stigma Associated with COVID-19 Among People Living with HIV in South Africa.

Authors:  Jana Jarolimova; Joyce Yan; Sabina Govere; Nompumelelo Ngobese; Zinhle M Shazi; Anele R Khumalo; Bridget A Bunda; Nafisa J Wara; Danielle Zionts; Hilary Thulare; Robert A Parker; Laura M Bogart; Ingrid V Bassett
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Implications of social media misinformation on COVID-19 vaccine confidence among pregnant women in Africa.

Authors:  Farah Ennab; Maryam Salma Babar; Abdul Rahman Khan; Rahul Jagdishchandra Mittal; Faisal A Nawaz; Mohammad Yasir Essar; Sajjad S Fazel
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2022-02-12

5.  COVID-19 and Vitamin D Misinformation on YouTube: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Emma K Quinn; Shelby Fenton; Chelsea A Ford-Sahibzada; Andrew Harper; Alessandro R Marcon; Timothy Caulfield; Sajjad S Fazel; Cheryl E Peters
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2022-03-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.