Literature DB >> 33395451

Increased and sex-selective avian predation of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria treated with Metarhizium acridum.

Wim C Mullié1, Robert A Cheke2, Stephen Young2, Abdou Baoua Ibrahim3, Albertinka J Murk4.   

Abstract

The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium acridum in oil-based formulations (Green Muscle® (GM)) is a biopesticide for locust control lacking side-effects on biodiversity, unlike chemical insecticides. Under controlled conditions, GM-treated locusts and grasshoppers attract predators, a complementary advantage in locust control. We assessed avian predation on a population of desert locusts in northern Niger aerially sprayed operationally with GM with 107 g viable conidia ha-1. Populations of adult locusts and birds and vegetation greenness were assessed simultaneously along two transects from 12 days before until 23 days after treatment. Common kestrels Falco tinnunculus and lanners F. biarmicus were the predominant avian predators. Regurgitated pellets and prey remains were collected daily beneath "plucking posts" of kestrels. Locusts started dying five days post-spray and GM had its maximum effect one-two weeks after the spray, with 80% efficacy at day 21. After spraying, bird numbers increased significantly (P<0.05) concurrent with decreasing desert locust densities. Locust numbers decreased significantly (P<0.001) with both time since spraying and decreasing greenness. Before spraying, kestrel food remains under plucking posts accounted for 34.3 ±13.4 prey items day-1, of which 31.0 ±11.9 were adult desert locusts (90.3%), reducing post-spray to 21.1 ±7.3 prey items day-1, of which19.5 ±6.7 were adult desert locusts (92.5%), attributable to decreased use of the plucking-posts by the kestrels rather than an effect of the spray. After spraying, kestrels took significantly (P<0.05) more larger female (75-80%) than smaller male (20-25%) locusts. Avian predation probably enhanced the impact of the GM on the desert locust population, especially by removing large adult females. No direct or indirect adverse side-effects were observed on non-target organisms including locust predators such as ants and birds. These substantial ecological advantages should also be considered when choosing between conventional chemical and biopesticide-based locust control.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33395451      PMCID: PMC7781369          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Avian food selection with application to pesticide risk assessment: are dead and desiccated insects a desirable food source?

Authors:  Jennifer M Stafford; Larry W Brewer; James A Gessaman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Estimating the probability of bird mortality from pesticide sprays on the basis of the field study record.

Authors:  Pierre Mineau
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Why gigantic locust swarms are challenging governments and researchers.

Authors:  Antoaneta Roussi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Pathological and physiological responses of ring-necked pheasant chicks following dietary exposure to the fungus Metarhizium flavoviride, a biocontrol agent for locusts in Africa.

Authors:  J E Smits; D L Johnson; C Lomer
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Insecticide residues in Australian plague locusts (Chortoicetes terminifera Walker) after ultra-low volume aerial application of the organophosphorus insecticide fenitrothion.

Authors:  Paul G Story; Pierre Mineau; Wim C Mullié
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.742

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sexual repurposing of juvenile aposematism in locusts.

Authors:  Darron A Cullen; Gregory A Sword; Gil G Rosenthal; Stephen J Simpson; Elfie Dekempeneer; Maarten L A T M Hertog; Bart M Nicolaï; Robbe Caes; Lisa Mannaerts; Jozef Vanden Broeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.