Ali M Agha1, Salim S Virani1,2, Christie M Ballantyne1. 1. Department of Medicine and Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention, Baylor College of Medicine. 2. Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the key messages from the 2018 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol and the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias. We also review some of the evidence that served as the basis for these guidelines and share our opinion regarding these guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), severe hypercholesterolemia, familial hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes should be treated aggressively with lipid-lowering therapy. In addition to traditional risk factors included in risk scores, assessment of risk enhancers/modifiers may improve risk stratification. The addition of ezetimibe ± proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors plays an integral role in the management of very-high-risk ASCVD patients; the ESC/EAS guidelines support more aggressive use of these medications. SUMMARY: Both the AHA/ACC Multisociety and ESC/EAS guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to management of blood cholesterol. The greatest difference between these two guidelines is the classification and recommended management of very-high-risk patients. Implementation of either guideline will likely lead to improved ASCVD outcomes compared with current treatment practice. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COE/A22.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the key messages from the 2018 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol and the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias. We also review some of the evidence that served as the basis for these guidelines and share our opinion regarding these guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), severe hypercholesterolemia, familial hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes should be treated aggressively with lipid-lowering therapy. In addition to traditional risk factors included in risk scores, assessment of risk enhancers/modifiers may improve risk stratification. The addition of ezetimibe ± proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors plays an integral role in the management of very-high-risk ASCVD patients; the ESC/EAS guidelines support more aggressive use of these medications. SUMMARY: Both the AHA/ACC Multisociety and ESC/EAS guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to management of blood cholesterol. The greatest difference between these two guidelines is the classification and recommended management of very-high-risk patients. Implementation of either guideline will likely lead to improved ASCVD outcomes compared with current treatment practice. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COE/A22.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vijay Nambi; Lloyd Chambless; Aaron R Folsom; Max He; Yijuan Hu; Tom Mosley; Kelly Volcik; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jonathan C Hong; Ron Blankstein; Leslee J Shaw; William V Padula; Alejandro Arrieta; Jonathan A Fialkow; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha; Harlan M Krumholz; Khurram Nasir Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-08
Authors: Jürgen Rademaker; Heiko Schöder; Nikki S Ariaratnam; Harry W Strauss; Joachim Yahalom; Richard Steingart; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Joseph Yeboah; Robyn L McClelland; Tamar S Polonsky; Gregory L Burke; Christopher T Sibley; Daniel O'Leary; Jeffery J Carr; David C Goff; Philip Greenland; David M Herrington Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Angela Lowenstern; Shuang Li; Ann Marie Navar; Salim Virani; L Veronica Lee; Michael J Louie; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Erik Stroes; David Colquhoun; David Sullivan; Fernando Civeira; Robert S Rosenson; Gerald F Watts; Eric Bruckert; Leslie Cho; Ricardo Dent; Beat Knusel; Allen Xue; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Michael Rocco Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kausik K Ray; Bart Molemans; W Marieke Schoonen; Periklis Giovas; Sarah Bray; Gaia Kiru; Jennifer Murphy; Maciej Banach; Stefano De Servi; Dan Gaita; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; G Kees Hovingh; Jacek J Jozwiak; J Wouter Jukema; Robert Gabor Kiss; Serge Kownator; Helle K Iversen; Vincent Maher; Luis Masana; Alexander Parkhomenko; André Peeters; Piers Clifford; Katarina Raslova; Peter Siostrzonek; Stefano Romeo; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Michal Vrablik; Alberico L Catapano; Neil R Poulter Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 7.804