Anna Brewin1, Sheshadri Sriprasad2, Bhaskar K Somani1,3. 1. Clinical Fellow in Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton. 2. Institute of Medical Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK. 3. KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and N-acetyl-B-D-glucosamindase (NAG) are recognised as being useful for the detection of kidney tubular damage but their role in the diagnosis and prognosis of kidney stone disease (KSD) is still unknown. To clarify this, we performed a systematic review of literature in accordance with Cochrane methodology from inception to September 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: Twelve studies were included and a variety of urinary biomarkers (KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, proteins/peptides, cytokines, CA19-9) were measured in a total of 998 patients with KSD. Despite some contradicting studies, majority of the biomarkers studied showed a significant rise in patients with KSD compared to healthy controls, with levels decreasing after their surgical management, noticed as early as 4 h postprocedure. There was limited evidence of correlation with stone burden and elevated levels were also associated with hydronephrosis and superimposed infections. SUMMARY: Urinary biomarkers could be used in the diagnosis, prognosis and stone-treatment response in patients with KSD. However, as novel indicators, they may not be reliable as the sole diagnostic or prognostic tool for KSD as they are readily confounded by other causes of kidney injury. Further studies are needed to determine their ability to separate KSD from other causes of obstructive uropathy and acute renal injury.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and N-acetyl-B-D-glucosamindase (NAG) are recognised as being useful for the detection of kidney tubular damage but their role in the diagnosis and prognosis of kidney stone disease (KSD) is still unknown. To clarify this, we performed a systematic review of literature in accordance with Cochrane methodology from inception to September 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: Twelve studies were included and a variety of urinary biomarkers (KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, proteins/peptides, cytokines, CA19-9) were measured in a total of 998 patients with KSD. Despite some contradicting studies, majority of the biomarkers studied showed a significant rise in patients with KSD compared to healthy controls, with levels decreasing after their surgical management, noticed as early as 4 h postprocedure. There was limited evidence of correlation with stone burden and elevated levels were also associated with hydronephrosis and superimposed infections. SUMMARY: Urinary biomarkers could be used in the diagnosis, prognosis and stone-treatment response in patients with KSD. However, as novel indicators, they may not be reliable as the sole diagnostic or prognostic tool for KSD as they are readily confounded by other causes of kidney injury. Further studies are needed to determine their ability to separate KSD from other causes of obstructive uropathy and acute renal injury.