Nardin Samuel1, Daniel M Trifiletti2, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa3, L Dade Lunsford4, Jason Sheehan5. 1. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. jsheehan@virginia.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The field of neurosurgery has witnessed a dramatic increase in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a modality to treat various cranial and spinal pathologies. However, studies have consistently demonstrated disparities in SRS training. Accordingly, the present study represents a cross-sectional analysis of current SRS training and practice patterns. METHODS: An online survey was utilized to collect data from participants. Two-sided t-tests were used in order to compare frequency tables for statistically significant differences between groups. Qualitative analyses were performed by modified thematic analyses, employing open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 67 participants completed the online survey (16.4% response rate). The majority of participants were neurosurgery attendings (58.2%), followed by neurosurgery residents (25.4%). The majority of participants reported that resident exposure to SRS was gained primarily through non-SRS focused rotations (52.2%). The survey found that exposure to tumor cases was most frequent, followed by functional, vascular, and spine indications. The majority of participants (49.3%) indicate that residents are not competent or exhibit a low level of competency in SRS at the completion of neurosurgical residency. Qualitative analyses demonstrated that respondents believe SRS is a critical modality in current cranial neurosurgical care and that increased training is needed. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a multi-national analysis of SRS residency training and practice patterns, and aims to stimulate improvement in SRS in training worldwide. Enhanced resident training in SRS must include wider exposure to vascular, neoplastic, functional and pediatric indications for SRS.
INTRODUCTION: The field of neurosurgery has witnessed a dramatic increase in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a modality to treat various cranial and spinal pathologies. However, studies have consistently demonstrated disparities in SRS training. Accordingly, the present study represents a cross-sectional analysis of current SRS training and practice patterns. METHODS: An online survey was utilized to collect data from participants. Two-sided t-tests were used in order to compare frequency tables for statistically significant differences between groups. Qualitative analyses were performed by modified thematic analyses, employing open and axial coding. RESULTS: A total of 67 participants completed the online survey (16.4% response rate). The majority of participants were neurosurgery attendings (58.2%), followed by neurosurgery residents (25.4%). The majority of participants reported that resident exposure to SRS was gained primarily through non-SRS focused rotations (52.2%). The survey found that exposure to tumor cases was most frequent, followed by functional, vascular, and spine indications. The majority of participants (49.3%) indicate that residents are not competent or exhibit a low level of competency in SRS at the completion of neurosurgical residency. Qualitative analyses demonstrated that respondents believe SRS is a critical modality in current cranial neurosurgical care and that increased training is needed. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a multi-national analysis of SRS residency training and practice patterns, and aims to stimulate improvement in SRS in training worldwide. Enhanced resident training in SRS must include wider exposure to vascular, neoplastic, functional and pediatric indications for SRS.
Authors: Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Motohiro Hayashi; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Roberto Martinez; Ian Paddick; Jean Régis; Samuel Ryu; Ben Slotman; Antonio De Salles Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2017-07-14
Authors: Alireza Mansouri; Christopher D Witiw; Jetan H Badhiwala; Farshad Nassiri; Patrick J McDonald; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Gelareh Zadeh; Douglas Kondziolka Journal: Can J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jason Sheehan; John H Suh; Brian Kavanagh; Zhiyuan Xu; Lydia Ren; Kimball Sheehan; L Dade Lunsford Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Prasanth Romiyo; Kevin Ding; Dillon Dejam; Alyssa Franks; Edwin Ng; Komal Preet; Alexander M Tucker; Tianyi Niu; Daniel T Nagasawa; Shayan Rahman; Isaac Yang Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Emory McTyre; Corbin A Helis; Michael Farris; Lisa Wilkins; Darrell Sloan; William H Hinson; J Daniel Bourland; William A Dezarn; Michael T Munley; Kounosuke Watabe; Fei Xing; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Michael D Chan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Hideyuki Kano; Douglas Kondziolka; Huai-Che Yang; Oscar Zorro; Javier Lobato-Polo; Thomas J Flannery; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Or Cohen-Inbar; Robert M Starke; Cheng-Chia Lee; Hideyuki Kano; Paul Huang; Douglas Kondziolka; Inga S Grills; Danilo Silva; Mohmoud Abbassy; Symeon Missios; Gene H Barnett; L Dade Lunsford; Jason P Sheehan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Tamer Refaat; Michelle Gentile; Sean Sachdev; Prarthana Dalal; Anish Butala; Stanley Gutiontov; Irene Helenowksi; Plato Lee; Vythialinga Sathiaseelan; Orin Bloch; James Chandler; John A Kalapurakal Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2017-02-01