Literature DB >> 33394216

Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using maximum intensity T-projection imaging.

Marina Leitman1, David S Blondheim2, Sergiu Sabetay3, Vladimir Tyomkin4.   

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and grading of right-to-left shunt severity by the standard method of transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with bubble injection is often challenging. We proposed the novel Maximum Intensity T-Projection (MIP) Imaging method as a complementary or alternative approach for simplified diagnosis and grading of PFO. MIP Imaging represents the superimposition of all frames of an echocardiographic video onto one image. Thus, all bubbles passing from right to left atrium are represented in this single image. Diagnosis and quantification of PFO by MIP Images were compared to those obtained by standard echocardiographic methods, using the same echocardiography video loops. We applied the MIP Imaging approach to 122 echo examinations (75% of them TEE studies), performed to rule out PFOs. The average time needed to manually analyze video loops taken during bubble injection was 102 ± 52 s vs. less than 1 s using the MIP Imaging method. There was good concordance between the conventional echo method and MIP Imaging in the diagnosis and quantification of PFOs. MIP Imaging for diagnosis and quantification of PFOs was much less time consuming than the classical method and at least as accurate as the classical method. Thus MIP Imaging may be used initially as an adjunct method for PFO diagnosis and quantification and may eventually replace the classical method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bubble study; Maximum intensity T-projection imaging; Patent foramen ovale

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394216     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02123-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

Review 1.  Contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Michael J Stewart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure.

Authors:  Bushra S Rana; Martyn R Thomas; Patrick A Calvert; Mark J Monaghan; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

3.  Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: From the American Society of Echocardiography and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  Frank E Silvestry; Meryl S Cohen; Laurie B Armsby; Nitin J Burkule; Craig E Fleishman; Ziyad M Hijazi; Roberto M Lang; Jonathan J Rome; Yan Wang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Echocardiographic findings in simple and complex patent foramen ovale before and after transcatheter closure.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Enrico Mangieri; Lidia Capotosto; Gaetano Tanzilli; Ilaria D'Angeli; Danilo Toni; Alessia Azzano; Serafino Ricci; Attilio Placanica; Ennio Rinaldi; Khaled Mukred; Giuseppe Placanica; Rasul Ashurov
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Evidence-Based Management of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; Joseph Massaro; Laura Mauri; Harold Adams; Gregory W Albers; Robert Felberg; Howard Herrmann; Saibal Kar; Michael Landzberg; Albert Raizner; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Mas; Geneviève Derumeaux; Benoît Guillon; Evelyne Massardier; Hassan Hosseini; Laura Mechtouff; Caroline Arquizan; Yannick Béjot; Fabrice Vuillier; Olivier Detante; Céline Guidoux; Sandrine Canaple; Claudia Vaduva; Nelly Dequatre-Ponchelle; Igor Sibon; Pierre Garnier; Anna Ferrier; Serge Timsit; Emmanuelle Robinet-Borgomano; Denis Sablot; Jean-Christophe Lacour; Mathieu Zuber; Pascal Favrole; Jean-François Pinel; Marion Apoil; Peggy Reiner; Catherine Lefebvre; Patrice Guérin; Christophe Piot; Roland Rossi; Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé; Jean-Christophe Eicher; Nicolas Meneveau; Jean-René Lusson; Bernard Bertrand; Jean-Marc Schleich; François Godart; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Laurent Leborgne; Patrik Michel; Luc Pierard; Guillaume Turc; Martine Barthelet; Anaïs Charles-Nelson; Christian Weimar; Thierry Moulin; Jean-Michel Juliard; Gilles Chatellier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Guidelines for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of a Cardiac Source of Embolism.

Authors:  Muhamed Saric; Alicia C Armour; M Samir Arnaout; Farooq A Chaudhry; Richard A Grimm; Itzhak Kronzon; Bruce F Landeck; Kameswari Maganti; Hector I Michelena; Kirsten Tolstrup
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  John D Carroll; Jeffrey L Saver; David E Thaler; Richard W Smalling; Scott Berry; Lee A MacDonald; David S Marks; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism.

Authors:  Bernhard Meier; Bindu Kalesan; Heinrich P Mattle; Ahmed A Khattab; David Hildick-Smith; Dariusz Dudek; Grethe Andersen; Reda Ibrahim; Gerhard Schuler; Antony S Walton; Andreas Wahl; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.