Simisola O Teye1, Jeff D Yanosky2, Yendelela Cuffee2, Xingran Weng2, Raffy Luquis3, Elana Farace2,4, Li Wang2. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA. simi.bello@gmail.com. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA. 3. School of Behavioral Sciences and Education, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, PA, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether long-standing racial disparities in lead exposure still exists for children age 1-5 years old. We examined if blood lead levels were higher among non-Hispanic Black children and others compared to non-Hispanic White children. METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999-2016 were used. Geometric mean blood lead levels (BLLs) were compared by race/ethnicity using log-transformed simple linear regression. Associations between race and elevated BLL were assessed using weighted Chi-square tests. Log-transformed multiple weighted linear regression was used to assess what factors affected BLLs. RESULTS: A total of 6772 children were included in this study. In 1999-2000, the geometric mean BLL for non-Hispanic Black children was 3.08 μg/dL, compared to 2.03 μg/dL for non-Hispanic White children (p = 0.01). The difference in geometric mean BLL between non-Hispanic Black children and non-Hispanic White children continued to be statistically significant in later years (all p < 0.05) until 2015-2016 (0.89 μg/dL vs 0.74 μg/dL, p = 0.17). Log-transformed linear regression showed that being non-Hispanic Black and having low family income were independently associated with higher BLL. CONCLUSION: Although lead exposure in the general population continued to decline for all racial/ethnic groups, non-Hispanic Black children still had higher BLL than non-Hispanic White children. In more recent years, the racial/ethnic gap was lesser but persisted. Racial/ethnic disparity in childhood BLL could be partially explained by socio-economic factors.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether long-standing racial disparities in lead exposure still exists for children age 1-5 years old. We examined if blood lead levels were higher among non-Hispanic Black children and others compared to non-Hispanic White children. METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999-2016 were used. Geometric mean blood lead levels (BLLs) were compared by race/ethnicity using log-transformed simple linear regression. Associations between race and elevated BLL were assessed using weighted Chi-square tests. Log-transformed multiple weighted linear regression was used to assess what factors affected BLLs. RESULTS: A total of 6772 children were included in this study. In 1999-2000, the geometric mean BLL for non-Hispanic Black children was 3.08 μg/dL, compared to 2.03 μg/dL for non-Hispanic White children (p = 0.01). The difference in geometric mean BLL between non-Hispanic Black children and non-Hispanic White children continued to be statistically significant in later years (all p < 0.05) until 2015-2016 (0.89 μg/dL vs 0.74 μg/dL, p = 0.17). Log-transformed linear regression showed that being non-Hispanic Black and having low family income were independently associated with higher BLL. CONCLUSION: Although lead exposure in the general population continued to decline for all racial/ethnic groups, non-Hispanic Black children still had higher BLL than non-Hispanic White children. In more recent years, the racial/ethnic gap was lesser but persisted. Racial/ethnic disparity in childhood BLL could be partially explained by socio-economic factors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood lead levels; Children; Lead; NHANES; Racial disparities
Authors: Patrick N Breysse; Wayne E Cascio; Andrew M Geller; Conrad J Choiniere; Matthew Ammon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 11.561
Authors: Leanne S Fawkes; Thomas J McDonald; Taehyun Roh; Weihsueh A Chiu; Robert J Taylor; Garett T Sansom Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Cecilia S Alcala; Richard E Peltier; Penelope J E Quintana; Edmund Seto; Melissa Gonzales; Jill E Johnston; Lupita D Montoya; Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá; Paloma I Beamer Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 6.371