Juliette Cieslinski1, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro1, Letícia Kraft1, Paula Hansen Suss1, Edvaldo Rosa2, Luis Gustavo Morello3,4, Marcelo Pillonetto5, Felipe Francisco Tuon6,7. 1. Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 2. Xenobiotics Research Unit, School of Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 3. Paraná Institute of Molecular Biology, Curitiba, Brazil. 4. Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 5. School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 6. Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. felipe.tuon@pucpr.br. 7. Escola de Medicina-Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, R. Imaculada Conceição, 1155 - Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR, 80215-901, Brazil. felipe.tuon@pucpr.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for microbial detection in prosthetic joint infections is the multiple culture of the peri-prosthetic tissue. The fluid cultures after sonication can improve the recovery of the microorganisms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sonication technique with a plastic bag and the effect of refrigeration on microorganism detection with conventional culturing, MALDI-TOF MS and qPCR assay on an orthopedic screw model. METHODS: We produced biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on orthopedic screws, which were stored under different conditions and temperatures before sonication. After sonication, the mass spectrometry by MALDI-TOF, qPCR and culture protocols was performed using the sonicated fluid, for detecting the microorganisms involved in the biofilm. RESULTS: The bacterial bioburden decreased by approximately one log after the refrigeration period, in the screws containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. All the microorganisms involved in the screw biofilms were detected with MALDI-TOF and qPCR. Significant reductions in CFU counts occurred only in groups stored in the plastic bag, indicating that changes in temperature and humidity may favor cell death. However, this variation is not important for this model as it did not affect the detection owing to the high counts obtained. CONCLUSION: Microbial identification by MALDI-TOF in sonicated fluid is feasible. With qPCR, there were no differences between the detection in the screws processed immediately or after refrigeration. It is necessary to consider whether or not the refrigeration period would affect microbial recovery in an explanted prosthesis.
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for microbial detection in prosthetic joint infections is the multiple culture of the peri-prosthetic tissue. The fluid cultures after sonication can improve the recovery of the microorganisms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sonication technique with a plastic bag and the effect of refrigeration on microorganism detection with conventional culturing, MALDI-TOF MS and qPCR assay on an orthopedic screw model. METHODS: We produced biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on orthopedic screws, which were stored under different conditions and temperatures before sonication. After sonication, the mass spectrometry by MALDI-TOF, qPCR and culture protocols was performed using the sonicated fluid, for detecting the microorganisms involved in the biofilm. RESULTS: The bacterial bioburden decreased by approximately one log after the refrigeration period, in the screws containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. All the microorganisms involved in the screw biofilms were detected with MALDI-TOF and qPCR. Significant reductions in CFU counts occurred only in groups stored in the plastic bag, indicating that changes in temperature and humidity may favor cell death. However, this variation is not important for this model as it did not affect the detection owing to the high counts obtained. CONCLUSION: Microbial identification by MALDI-TOF in sonicated fluid is feasible. With qPCR, there were no differences between the detection in the screws processed immediately or after refrigeration. It is necessary to consider whether or not the refrigeration period would affect microbial recovery in an explanted prosthesis.
Authors: Laura Ferreira; Fernando Sánchez-Juanes; Magdalena González-Avila; David Cembrero-Fuciños; Ana Herrero-Hernández; José Manuel González-Buitrago; Juan Luis Muñoz-Bellido Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Eric Gomez; Charles Cazanave; Scott A Cunningham; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; James M Steckelberg; James R Uhl; Arlen D Hanssen; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Douglas R Osmon; Elie F Berbari; Jayawant Mandrekar; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jonathan H K Chen; Pak-Leung Ho; Grace S W Kwan; Kevin K K She; Gilman K H Siu; Vincent C C Cheng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Wing-Cheong Yam Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Charles Cazanave; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Arlen D Hanssen; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Eric O Gomez Urena; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Douglas R Osmon; Lindsay E Lough; Bobbi S Pritt; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Maria Dudareva; Lucinda Barrett; Mel Figtree; Matthew Scarborough; Masanori Watanabe; Robert Newnham; Rachael Wallis; Sarah Oakley; Ben Kendrick; David Stubbs; Martin A McNally; Philip Bejon; Bridget A Atkins; Adrian Taylor; Andrew J Brent Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.948