Literature DB >> 33394140

Direct detection of microorganisms in sonicated orthopedic devices after in vitro biofilm production and different processing conditions.

Juliette Cieslinski1, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro1, Letícia Kraft1, Paula Hansen Suss1, Edvaldo Rosa2, Luis Gustavo Morello3,4, Marcelo Pillonetto5, Felipe Francisco Tuon6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for microbial detection in prosthetic joint infections is the multiple culture of the peri-prosthetic tissue. The fluid cultures after sonication can improve the recovery of the microorganisms.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sonication technique with a plastic bag and the effect of refrigeration on microorganism detection with conventional culturing, MALDI-TOF MS and qPCR assay on an orthopedic screw model.
METHODS: We produced biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on orthopedic screws, which were stored under different conditions and temperatures before sonication. After sonication, the mass spectrometry by MALDI-TOF, qPCR and culture protocols was performed using the sonicated fluid, for detecting the microorganisms involved in the biofilm.
RESULTS: The bacterial bioburden decreased by approximately one log after the refrigeration period, in the screws containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. All the microorganisms involved in the screw biofilms were detected with MALDI-TOF and qPCR. Significant reductions in CFU counts occurred only in groups stored in the plastic bag, indicating that changes in temperature and humidity may favor cell death. However, this variation is not important for this model as it did not affect the detection owing to the high counts obtained.
CONCLUSION: Microbial identification by MALDI-TOF in sonicated fluid is feasible. With qPCR, there were no differences between the detection in the screws processed immediately or after refrigeration. It is necessary to consider whether or not the refrigeration period would affect microbial recovery in an explanted prosthesis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Infection; Model; Screw; Sonication

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394140     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02856-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  29 in total

1.  Direct identification of urinary tract pathogens from urine samples by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Laura Ferreira; Fernando Sánchez-Juanes; Magdalena González-Avila; David Cembrero-Fuciños; Ana Herrero-Hernández; José Manuel González-Buitrago; Juan Luis Muñoz-Bellido
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication.

Authors:  Eric Gomez; Charles Cazanave; Scott A Cunningham; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; James M Steckelberg; James R Uhl; Arlen D Hanssen; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Douglas R Osmon; Elie F Berbari; Jayawant Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems.

Authors:  Jonathan H K Chen; Pak-Leung Ho; Grace S W Kwan; Kevin K K She; Gilman K H Siu; Vincent C C Cheng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Wing-Cheong Yam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid molecular microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Charles Cazanave; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Arlen D Hanssen; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Eric O Gomez Urena; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Douglas R Osmon; Lindsay E Lough; Bobbi S Pritt; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Apply the rubber dam.

Authors:  C Stebner
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 7.  New Technologies for Studying Biofilms.

Authors:  Michael J Franklin; Connie Chang; Tatsuya Akiyama; Brian Bothner
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-08

8.  Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Markus Vogt; Michael Leunig; Jürg Wüst; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Sonication versus Tissue Sampling for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint and Other Orthopedic Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Lucinda Barrett; Mel Figtree; Matthew Scarborough; Masanori Watanabe; Robert Newnham; Rachael Wallis; Sarah Oakley; Ben Kendrick; David Stubbs; Martin A McNally; Philip Bejon; Bridget A Atkins; Adrian Taylor; Andrew J Brent
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Direct identification from positive blood broth culture by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

Authors:  Maria Goreth Barberino; Marcio de Oliveira Silva; Ana Carolina Palmeiras Arraes; Luís Cláudio Correia; Ana Verena Mendes
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.257

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Reducing Biofilm Infections in Burn Patients' Wounds and Biofilms on Surfaces in Hospitals, Medical Facilities and Medical Equipment to Improve Burn Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Bennett Charles Thomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.