Literature DB >> 33393610

Comparing Video and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation.

Brett J King1, Ira Padnos2, Kenneth Mancuso2, Brian J Christensen1.   

Abstract

This parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial compared intubation duration and success using video laryngoscopy (VL) versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) during routine nasotracheal intubation. Fifty patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned into 2 groups receiving either VL or DL to facilitate nasotracheal intubation. The primary outcome was the amount of time required to complete nasotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes included the success of first attempt at intubation and the use of Magill forceps. Results demonstrated a mean time to intubation of 142 seconds in the DL group and 94 seconds in the VL group (p = .011). First attempt intubation success was 92.0% in the VL group and 84.0% in the DL group (p = .34). The use of Magill forceps was significantly increased in the DL group (p = .007). VL for routine nasotracheal intubation in oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures results in significantly faster intubation times and decreased use of Magill forceps compared with traditional DL.
© 2020 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMAC; Magill forceps; Nasotracheal intubation; Video laryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33393610      PMCID: PMC7780258          DOI: 10.2344/anpr-67-02-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  16 in total

1.  Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.

Authors:  Marlies Noordzij; Giovanni Tripepi; Friedo W Dekker; Carmine Zoccali; Michael W Tanck; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Comparing Video Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Intubation.

Authors:  Hui-Xian Li; Fu-Shan Xue; Ya-Yang Liu; Qing Liu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B M A Pieters; E H A Maas; J T A Knape; A A J van Zundert
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Video Laryngoscopy or Macintosh Laryngoscopy: Which One Is More Successful in Patients With Bilateral Mandibular Fractures?

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Mastaneh Dahi; Mohammad Reza Moshari; Fereydoon Pourdanesh; Sahar Zolfigol
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Lascarrou; Julie Boisrame-Helms; Arthur Bailly; Aurelie Le Thuaut; Toufik Kamel; Emmanuelle Mercier; Jean-Damien Ricard; Virginie Lemiale; Gwenhael Colin; Jean Paul Mira; Ferhat Meziani; Jonathan Messika; Pierre Francois Dequin; Thierry Boulain; Elie Azoulay; Benoit Champigneulle; Jean Reignier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Risk Factors Assessment of the Difficult Intubation using Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS).

Authors:  Vaibhav K Nasa; Shaila S Kamath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

7.  Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roya Yumul; Ofelia L Elvir-Lazo; Paul F White; Alejandro Sloninsky; Marshal Kaplan; Robert Kariger; Robert Naruse; Nathaniel Parker; Christine Pham; Xiao Zhang; Ronald H Wender
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  S R Lewis; A R Butler; J Parker; T M Cook; O J Schofield-Robinson; A F Smith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Predictors of difficult intubation defined by the intubation difficulty scale (IDS): predictive value of 7 airway assessment factors.

Authors:  Suk-Hwan Seo; Jeong-Gil Lee; Soo-Bong Yu; Doo-Sik Kim; Sie-Jeong Ryu; Kyung-Han Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14

10.  Incidence and predictors of difficult nasotracheal intubation with airway scope.

Authors:  Koyu Ono; Tomoko Goto; Daishi Nakai; Shuhei Ueki; Seiichiro Takenaka; Tomomi Moriya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chia-Hao Ho; Li-Chung Chen; Wen-Hao Hsu; Tzu-Yu Lin; Meng Lee; Cheng-Wei Lu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.