Literature DB >> 33393481

Universal screening identifies asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 among pregnant women in India.

Rakesh Waghmare1, Rahul Gajbhiye2, Niraj N Mahajan3, Deepak Modi2, Sanjay Mukherjee4, Smita D Mahale5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33393481      PMCID: PMC7510530          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Asymptomatic women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at risk of infecting their newborns and also pose a risk to healthcare providers and other patients [1,2,3]. Considering this, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) recommended universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women [4]. Maharashtra is the worst-hit state in India and universal screening strategy for pregnant women was implemented in several public hospitals during this time. Herein, we report the outcome of implementation of this strategy. Women presenting in labour or likely to deliver in next 5 days were screened for SARS-CoV-2 as per ICMR guidelines [4]. Data from 25th April to 20th May, 2020 was collected from 15 participating hospitals of PregCovid registry network (https://pregcovid.com/). In all, 141/1140 pregnant women were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 resulting in a prevalence of 12.3% (Mean 9.4, 95% CI 6.6 – 12.1) in Maharashtra, India [Fig. 1 A]. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in women varied (0-40%) across the different hospitals in the state. For estimation of numbers of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, the data of 141 women was pooled with data from Topiwala National Medical College (TNMC) & BYL Nair Hospital TNMC Mumbai (n = 180) which exclusively caters COVID-19 patients (n = 180). Of the 321 SARS-CoV-2 positive women only 37 (range 0-17%) women were symptomatic (Fig. 1B). The prevalence of symptomatic pregnant women is 11.5 % (Mean 6.8, 95% CI 2.4-11.2) while that of asymptomatic pregnant women is 88.5% (Mean 79.8, 95% CI 75.7- 83.9) [Fig. 1B]. The proportion of symptomatic to asymptomatic individuals varied greatly across the different cities (not shown). Our results estimate presence of one symptomatic to every nine asymptomatic pregnant women. This is in concordance to the number proposed based on mathematical calculations and some observational data [5].
Fig. 1

SARS-CoV-2 test results among pregnant women and their symptomatic status. A) Pregnant women (n = 1140) were screened for SARS-CoV-2 as per the national guidelines and the proportion of positive women are given. B) Percentage of symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in women tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 321). The data in B is a pool of data in Fig A and 180 additional patients from a hospital catering to only COVID-19 pregnant women.

SARS-CoV-2 test results among pregnant women and their symptomatic status. A) Pregnant women (n = 1140) were screened for SARS-CoV-2 as per the national guidelines and the proportion of positive women are given. B) Percentage of symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in women tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 321). The data in B is a pool of data in Fig A and 180 additional patients from a hospital catering to only COVID-19 pregnant women. This data on undocumented or “steady state” infections in pregnant women is useful for ensuring safe obstetric and neonatal services and assessing the burden of COVID-19 in the region to plan strategies on strengthening or relaxing mass social distancing measures. We strongly recommend that the strategy of universal testing of pregnant women admitted for delivery is essential and must be implemented rigorously not just to protect the women and their newborns; but also, the healthcare workers and curb spread of the infection in the community.

Declaration of Competing Interest

All authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  4 in total

1.  Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in the first trimester placenta leading to transplacental transmission and fetal demise from an asymptomatic mother.

Authors:  Prajakta Shende; Pradip Gaikwad; Manisha Gandhewar; Pawankumar Ukey; Anshul Bhide; Vainav Patel; Sharad Bhagat; Vikrant Bhor; Smita Mahale; Rahul Gajbhiye; Deepak Modi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing of pregnant women admitted for delivery in 2 Italian regions.

Authors:  Luigi Gagliardi; Roberto Danieli; Giovanni Suriano; Angelina Vaccaro; Gino Tripodi; Franca Rusconi; Luca A Ramenghi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery.

Authors:  Desmond Sutton; Karin Fuchs; Mary D'Alton; Dena Goffman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Ruiyun Li; Sen Pei; Bin Chen; Yimeng Song; Tao Zhang; Wan Yang; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Manoj Mohanan; Anup Malani; Kaushik Krishnan; Anu Acharya
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and maternal-perinatal outcomes among pregnant women admitted for delivery: Experience from COVID-19-dedicated maternity hospital in Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir (India).

Authors:  Puneet Gupta; Surender Kumar; Shashi S Sharma
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 20.693

3.  Clinical presentations, pregnancy complications, and maternal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 and tuberculosis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rahul K Gajbhiye; Neha Kamath; Niraj N Mahajan; Shubhada Bahirat; Gauri Patokar; Aishwarya V Bhurke; Deepak N Modi; Smita D Mahale
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.447

4.  A single-center observational study on clinical features and outcomes of 21 SARS-CoV-2-infected neonates from India.

Authors:  Ruchi Nanavati; Dwayne Mascarenhas; Medha Goyal; Anitha Haribalakrishna; Gita Nataraj
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  COVID-19 and pregnancy: A comparison of case reports, case series and registry studies.

Authors:  Eloise M Young; Oleia Green; Joel Stewart; Yasmin King; Keelin O'Donoghue; Kate F Walker; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Protocol for a prospective, hospital-based registry of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: PregCovid Registry study.

Authors:  Rahul K Gajbhiye; Niraj N Mahajan; Rakesh Waghmare; Suchitra V Surve; Prashant Howal; Aishwarya Bhurke; Merlin Pious; Deepak N Modi; Smita D Mahale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nur Amirah Farhanah Hashim; Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy; Rahana Abdul Rahman; Aida Hani Mohd Kalok; Rosnah Sutan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 8.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus-2 infection (COVID-19) in pregnancy - An overview.

Authors:  Wafaa Ali Belail Hammad; Mariam Al Beloushi; Badreleden Ahmed; Justin C Konje
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on multiple gestation pregnancy.

Authors:  Niraj N Mahajan; Munira Ansari; Chaitanya Gaikwad; Priyanka Jadhav; Deepika Tirkey; Madhura P Pophalkar; Aishwarya V Bhurke; Deepak N Modi; Smita D Mahale; Rahul K Gajbhiye
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 10.  Differential impact of COVID-19 in pregnant women from high-income countries and low- to middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rahul K Gajbhiye; Mamta S Sawant; Periyasamy Kuppusamy; Suchitra Surve; Achhelal Pasi; Ranjan K Prusty; Smita D Mahale; Deepak N Modi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.447

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.