Literature DB >> 33393055

Robotic Assessment of Upper Limb Function in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Chronic Stroke.

Yining Chen1, Meredith C Poole1, Shelby V Olesovsky1, Allen A Champagne1, Kathleen A Harrison1, Joseph Y Nashed1, Nicole S Coverdale1, Stephen H Scott1, Douglas J Cook2,3.   

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide and survivors are frequently left with long-term disabilities that diminish their autonomy and result in the need for chronic care. There is an urgent need for the development of therapies that improve stroke recovery, as well as accurate and quantitative tools to measure function. Nonhuman primates closely resemble humans in neuroanatomy and upper limb function and may be crucial in randomized pre-clinical trials for testing the efficacy of stroke therapies. To test the feasibility of robotic assessment of motor function in a NHP model of stroke, two cynomolgus macaques were trained to perform a visually guided reaching task and were also assessed in a passive stretch task using the Kinarm robot. Strokes were then induced in these animals by transiently occluding the middle cerebral artery, and their motor performance on the same tasks was assessed after recovery. Relative to pre-stroke performance, post-stroke hand movements of the affected limb became slower and less accurate. Regression analyses revealed both recovered and compensatory movements to complete movements in different spatial directions. Lastly, we noted decreased range of motion in the elbow joint of the affected limb post-stroke associated with spasticity during passive stretch. Taken together, these studies highlight that sensorimotor deficits in reaching movements following stroke in cynomolgus macaques resemble those in human patients and validate the use of robotic assessment tools in a nonhuman primate model of stroke for identifying and characterizing such deficits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinarm; Macaque; Nonhuman primate; Stroke; Translational research

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33393055     DOI: 10.1007/s12975-020-00859-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Stroke Res        ISSN: 1868-4483            Impact factor:   6.829


  61 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Corwin Boake; Elizabeth A Noser; Tony Ro; Sarah Baraniuk; Mary Gaber; Ruth Johnson; Eva T Salmeron; Thao M Tran; Jenny M Lai; Edward Taub; Lemuel A Moye; James C Grotta; Harvey S Levin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans?

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Mary Bartlett Bunge; James W Fawcett; Robert G Grossman; Jon H Kaas; Roger Lemon; Irin Maier; John Martin; Randolph J Nudo; Almudena Ramon-Cueto; Eric M Rouiller; Lisa Schnell; Thierry Wannier; Martin E Schwab; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Fiona Coupar; Alex Pollock
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 5.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.

Authors:  Timothy H Murphy; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  Different strokes for different folks: the rich diversity of animal models of focal cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  David W Howells; Michelle J Porritt; Sarah S J Rewell; Victoria O'Collins; Emily S Sena; H Bart van der Worp; Richard J Traystman; Malcolm R Macleod
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 7.  Nonhuman primate models of stroke for translational neuroprotection research.

Authors:  Douglas J Cook; Michael Tymianski
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 8.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Rodent models of focal stroke: size, mechanism, and purpose.

Authors:  S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-07

10.  Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale.

Authors:  Sue-Min Lai; Stephanie Studenski; Pamela W Duncan; Subashan Perera
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.