| Literature DB >> 33392969 |
Natalie A Blackburn1, Vivian F Go2, Quynh Bui3, Heidi Hutton4, Radhika P Tampi5, Teerada Sripaipan2, Tran Viet Ha3, Carl A Latkin6, Shelley Golden2, Carol Golin2, Geetanjali Chander7, Constantine Frangakis8, Nisha Gottfredson2, David W Dowdy5.
Abstract
Brief interventions to reduce frequent alcohol use among persons with HIV (PWH) are evidence-based, but resource-constrained settings must contend with competition for health resources. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of two intervention arms compared to the standard of care (SOC) in a three-arm randomized control trial targeting frequent alcohol use in PWH through increasing the percent days abstinent from alcohol and viral suppression. We estimated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from a modified societal perspective and a 1-year time horizon using a Markov model of health outcomes. The two-session brief intervention (BI), relative to the six-session combined intervention (CoI), was more effective and less costly; the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of the BI relative to the SOC, was $525 per QALY gained. The BI may be cost-effective for the HIV treatment setting; the health utility gained from viral suppression requires further exploration.Entities:
Keywords: Brief intervention; Economic evaluation; Frequent alcohol use; Viral suppression
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33392969 PMCID: PMC8576395 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-03139-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165