Neusa F Torres1,2, Buyisile Chibi3, Desmond Kuupiel3, Vernon P Solomon4, Tivani P Mashamba-Thompson5, Lyn E Middleton4. 1. Instituto Superior de Ciências de Saúde (ISCISA), Maputo, Mozambique. torresneusa@gmail.com. 2. Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. torresneusa@gmail.com. 3. Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. 4. Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global increase in the utilization of non - prescribed antibiotics (NPA), is concerning, with high persistence within the low and middle-income countries (LMICs). With a negative impact on the health of individuals and communities the use of NPA paves the way to the propagation of superbugs that potentially predisposes to changes in bacterial resistance patterns, antibiotic resistance (AR) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed at estimating through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of NPA utilisation and describe its primary sources in LMICs. METHODS: The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis which study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017072954). The review used The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies searched in databases were deemed eligible if reported evidence of practices of self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) and the prevalence of NPA utilisation within adult participants from LMICs, published between 2007 to 2017. The pooled analyses were carried out using Meta XL statistical software. The pooled prevalence was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: The review included a total of 11 cross-sectional studies, involving 5080 participants and conducted in LMICs from Asia (India, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Yemen), Latin America (Guatemala), Africa (Nigeria). All studies reported existing practices of SMA, with reported prevalence ranging from 50% to 93,8%. The pooled prevalence of SMA was 78% (95% CI: 65-89%). The main sources of NPA were; pharmacies, family and friends, old prescriptions, home cabinet and leftover antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a high prevalence of utilisation of NPA in the studied LMICs, these were found to be twice as high in women than men and those participants aged between 18 and 40 years old. The review suggests f considering broader qualitative and comprehensive contextuallized research to better understand the nuances of NPA use. These would be benefitial to uncover uncover gray areas, inform decisions, support the (re) design and implementation of multifaceted interventions towards antibiotic stewardship and conservancy in LMICs.
BACKGROUND: The global increase in the utilization of non - prescribed antibiotics (NPA), is concerning, with high persistence within the low and middle-income countries (LMICs). With a negative impact on the health of individuals and communities the use of NPA paves the way to the propagation of superbugs that potentially predisposes to changes in bacterial resistance patterns, antibiotic resistance (AR) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed at estimating through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of NPA utilisation and describe its primary sources in LMICs. METHODS: The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis which study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017072954). The review used The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies searched in databases were deemed eligible if reported evidence of practices of self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) and the prevalence of NPA utilisation within adult participants from LMICs, published between 2007 to 2017. The pooled analyses were carried out using Meta XL statistical software. The pooled prevalence was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: The review included a total of 11 cross-sectional studies, involving 5080 participants and conducted in LMICs from Asia (India, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Yemen), Latin America (Guatemala), Africa (Nigeria). All studies reported existing practices of SMA, with reported prevalence ranging from 50% to 93,8%. The pooled prevalence of SMA was 78% (95% CI: 65-89%). The main sources of NPA were; pharmacies, family and friends, old prescriptions, home cabinet and leftover antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a high prevalence of utilisation of NPA in the studied LMICs, these were found to be twice as high in women than men and those participants aged between 18 and 40 years old. The review suggests f considering broader qualitative and comprehensive contextuallized research to better understand the nuances of NPA use. These would be benefitial to uncover uncover gray areas, inform decisions, support the (re) design and implementation of multifaceted interventions towards antibiotic stewardship and conservancy in LMICs.
Authors: Muhammad Bilal; Abdul Haseeb; Mohammad Hassaan Khan; Mohammad Hussham Arshad; Asma Akbar Ladak; Sufyan Khan Niazi; Muhammad Daniyal Musharraf; Adil Al-Karim Manji Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2016-05-01
Authors: Iruka N Okeke; Keith P Klugman; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Adriano G Duse; Philip Jenkins; Thomas F O'Brien; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Ramanan Laxminarayan Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Jan J Barendregt; Suhail A Doi; Yong Yi Lee; Rosana E Norman; Theo Vos Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Thomas P Van Boeckel; Sumanth Gandra; Ashvin Ashok; Quentin Caudron; Bryan T Grenfell; Simon A Levin; Ramanan Laxminarayan Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Jill A Hayden; Danielle A van der Windt; Jennifer L Cartwright; Pierre Côté; Claire Bombardier Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brooke M Ramay; Jorge Jara; Maria Purificación Moreno; Patrizia Lupo; Carlos Serrano; Juan P Alvis; C Sofia Arriola; Vic Veguilla; S Cornelia Kaydos-Daniels Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 4.135