Literature DB >> 33389745

Sintered S53P4 bioactive glass scaffolds have anti-inflammatory properties and stimulate osteogenesis in vitro

R Björkenheim1, E Jämsen, E Eriksson, P Uppstu, L Aalto-Setälä, L Hupa, K K Eklund, M Ainola, N C Lindfors, J Pajarinen.   

Abstract

Bioactive glasses (BAG) are used as bone-graft substitutes in orthopaedic surgery. A specific BAG scaffold was developed by sintering BAG-S53P4 granules. It is hypothesised that this scaffold can be used as a bone substitute to fill bone defects and induce a bioactive membrane (IM) around the defect site. Beyond providing the scaffold increased mechanical strength, that the initial inflammatory reaction and subsequent IM formation can be enhanced by coating the scaffolds with poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) is also hypothesised. To study the immunomodulatory effects, BAG-S53P4 (± PLGA) scaffolds were placed on monolayers of primary human macrophage cultures and the production of various pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines was assessed using reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and ELISA. To study the osteogenic effects, BAG-S53P4 (± PLGA) scaffolds were cultured with rabbit mesenchymal stem cells and osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by RT-qPCR and matrix mineralisation assays. The scaffold ion release was quantified and the BAG surface reactivity visualised. Furthermore, the pH of culture media was measured. BAG-S53P4 scaffolds had both anti-inflammatory and osteogenic properties that were likely attributable to alkalinisation of the media and ion release from the scaffold. pH change, ion release, and immunomodulatory properties of the scaffold could be modulated by the PLGA coating. Contrary to the hypothesis, the coating functioned by attenuating the BAG surface reactions and subsequent anti-inflammatory properties, rather than inducing an elevated inflammatory response compared to BAG-S53P4 alone. These results further validated the use of BAG-S53P4 (± PLGA) scaffolds as bone substitutes and indicate that scaffold properties can be tailored to a specific clinical need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389745     DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v041a02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  3 in total

1.  Enchondromas of the Hand: Curettage With Autogenous Bone vs. Bioactive Glass S53P4 for Void Augmentation.

Authors:  Nina Lindfors; Elias Kukkonen; Antti Stenroos; Panu H Nordback; Turkka Anttila; Samuli Aspinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Treatment of Infection-Related Non-Unions with Bioactive Glass-A Promising Approach or Just Another Method of Dead Space Management?

Authors:  Holger Freischmidt; Jonas Armbruster; Catharina Rothhaas; Nadine Titze; Thorsten Guehring; Dennis Nurjadi; Robert Sonntag; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Paul Alfred Grützner; Lars Helbig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Bioactive glasses incorporating less-common ions to improve biological and physical properties.

Authors:  Usanee Pantulap; Marcela Arango-Ospina; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.