Literature DB >> 33389735

Adoption of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Decreased Use of Articular Constraint and Manipulation under Anesthesia Compared to a Manual Approach.

Jenny Zhang1, Chelsea N Matzko2, Andrew Sawires2, Joseph O Ehiorobo2, Michael A Mont1,2, Matthew S Hepinstall1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Haptic robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) seeks to leverage three-dimensional planning, intraoperative assessment of ligament laxity, and guided bone preparation to establish and achieve patient-specific targets for implant position. We sought to compare (1) operative details, (2) knee alignment, (3) recovery of knee function, and (4) complications during adoption of this technique to our experience with manual TKA. We compared 120 RATKAs performed between December 2016 and July 2018 to 120 consecutive manual TKAs performed between May 2015 and January 2017. Operative details, lengths of stay (LOS), and discharge dispositions were collected. Tibiofemoral angles, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and ranges of motion were assessed until 3 months postoperatively. Manipulations under anesthesia, complications, and reoperations were tabulated. Mean operative times were 22 minutes longer in RATKA (p < 0.001) for this early cohort, but decreased by 27 minutes (p < 0.001) from the first 25 RATKA cases to the last 25 RATKA cases. Less articular constraint was used to achieve stability in RATKA (93 vs. 55% cruciate-retaining, p < 0.001; 3 vs. 35% posterior stabilized (PS), p < 0.001; and 4 vs. 10% varus-valgus constrained, p_ = _0.127). RATKA had lower LOS (2.7 vs. 3.4 days, p < 0.001). Discharge dispositions, tibiofemoral angles, KSS, and knee flexion angles did not differ, but manipulations were less common in RATKAs (4 vs. 17%, p = 0.013). We observed less use of constraint, shorter LOS, and fewer manipulations under anesthesia in RATKA, with no increase in complications. Operative times were longer, particularly early in the learning curve, but improved with experience. All measured patient-centered outcomes were equivalent or favored the newer technique, suggesting that RATKA with patient-specific alignment targets does not compromise initial quality. Observed differences may relate to improved ligament balance or diminished need for ligament release. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389735     DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.501


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jia-Zheng Xu; Liang-Liang Li; Xiang Li; Ji-Ying Chen; Jun Fu; Chi Xu; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Wei Chai; Li-Bo Hao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cost Savings Demonstrated at One Year.

Authors:  Kevin L Ong; Andréa Coppolecchia; Zhongming Chen; Heather N Watson; David Jacofsky; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-05-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.