Literature DB >> 33389696

Characterization and outcomes of acute myocardial injury in COVID-19 intensive care patients.

Vincent Labbé1,2, Stephane Ederhy3,4, Nathanael Lapidus5,6, Joe-Elie Salem7,8,9, Antoine Trinh-Duc10, Ariel Cohen3,4,11, Muriel Fartoukh10,12, Guillaume Voiriot10,12.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389696      PMCID: PMC7778688          DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01560-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


× No keyword cloud information.
Acute myocardial injury (MI), defined by an increase in cardiac troponin (cTn), is common in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. MI has been associated with mortality in series mostly retrospective, including heterogeneous COVID-19 patients presenting with mild to critically ill conditions [1, 2]. Measurements of cardiac troponin (cTn) were often obtained only at baseline and requested based on clinical judgment. Thus, the prevalence of MI in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients evaluated by systematic serial cTn assessments is unknown. In addition, information for comprehension of the potential underlying mechanism leading to MI is still lacking. In this series of consecutive ICU COVID-19 patients, MI was assessed by a comprehensive workup including sequential cTn dosages, electrocardiography (ECG), and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to address the question of its prevalence, characterization, and prognostic value in the ICU setting. All the consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to our dedicated COVID-19 ICU between February 22 and April 31, 2020, were analysed. Laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 was defined as a positive result of real-time RT-PCR assay of nasal and pharyngeal swabs. The study was approved by the local Institutional Ethical Board (Sorbonne University, CER-2020-14). Cardiac investigations were systematically collected including daily dosage of High sensitivity cardiac troponin I (Hs-cTnI) during the first week of ICU stay, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), ECG, and a TTE on ICU admission. The presence of MI was defined by the highest Hs-cTnI value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit and a change in values of ≥ 20% within the first 48 h (Hs-cTnI initial value) [3]. Studied outcomes were the overall mortality at day-28 and the incidence of cardiovascular events (a composite of death, cardiac-arrest, cardiogenic shock, and arterial thrombotic event) at day 28. The association between MI and outcomes was estimated by logistic regression. Overall, 92 patients (78.3% men; age 62 [53-69] years) were analysed (Table 1). COVID-19 was diagnosed in ambulant setting, hospital (emergency department or conventional wards), and ICU in respectively 4 (4.3%), 70 (76.1%), and 18 (19.6%) patients. MI was diagnosed in 53 patients (57.6%; 95% confidence interval[CI], 46.8–67.9%) with a Hs-cTnI initial value of 112 (54–260) pg/ml. Among patient with MI, 13 (24.5%) presented ECG abnormalities including 1 (1.9%) ST-segment elevation, 2 (3.8%) ST-segment depression and 13 (24.5%) T wave inversion. Patients with MI had higher BNP levels (78 [20-188] vs. 20 [13-59], p < 0.001) and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (55 [50-60] vs. 60 [55-60], p = 0.02) than patients without MI. A greater proportion of patients with MI required catecholamine, invasive mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy. Cardiovascular events occurred in 23 (25%) patients, including cardiac arrest (n = 1, 1.1%), cardiogenic shock (n = 4, 4.3%), arterial thrombotic event (n = 4, 4.3%), and death (n = 18; 19.6%). Figure 1 illustrates the association of mortality with MI (Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank test p = 0.05). At day 28, the Odds Ratio (OR) for death and cardiovascular events in patients with versus without MI were 3.14 (95% CI 1.02–11.89) and 4.22 (95%CI 1.43–12.40), respectively. When adjusting on sepsis-related organ failure assessment, these associations were not significant (OR 1.74, 95%CI 0.49–7.09 and OR 2.01, 95%CI 0.56–8.31, respectively). The magnitude of the Hs-cTnI initial values was associated with overall mortality (crude [OR] 2.42; 95%CI 1.25–4.94 per tenfold increase; Fig. 2). Median daily Hs-cTnI values during the first week of ICU admission remained higher in non-survivors, as compared with survivors (see Figure E1 in the online supplement data).
Table 1

Characteristics, management, and outcome at day 28 of patients with COVID-19

Total, n = 92aNo acute myocardial injury, n = 39Acute Myocardial injury, n = 53p
Baseline characteristics
 Age, median (IQR), years62 (53–69)60 (52–65)63 (55–71)0.07
 Male, No. (%)72 (78.3)29 (74.4)43 (81.1)0.45
 Body mass index, median (IQR), kg/m228 (24–31)28 (24–31)27 (25–31)0.72
 Time to ICU admission from symptoms onset, median (IQR), days8 (6–11)8 (6–13)8 (5–10)0.14
 Direct ICU admission (from home or ED), No. (%)49 (53.3)17 (43.6)32 (60.4)0.14
 Active smoking, No. (%)6 (6.5)3 (7.7)3 (5.7)0.69
 Diabetes mellitus, No. (%)24 (26.1)12 (30.8)12 (22.6)0.47
 Arterial hypertension, No. (%)58 (63.0)18 (46.2)40 (75.5)0.005
 Coronary artery disease, No. (%)16 (17.4)4 (10.3)12 (22.6)0.17
 Coronary revascularizationb, No. (%)10 (10.9)3 (7.7)7 (13.2)0.51
 Congestive heart disease, No. (%)8 (8.7)2 (5.1)6 (11.3)0.46
 Left-sided significant valve disease, No. (%)3 (3.3)0 (0)3 (5.7)0.26
 ACEI/ARB, No. (%)42 (45.7)12 (30.8)30 (56.6)0.02
Acute myocardial injury characteristics
 Electrocardiography on ICU admission
  Heart rate, median (IQR), beats/min87 (75–100)90 (77–100)81 (75–100)0.40
  ST segment elevation, No. (%)1 (1.1)0 (0.0)1 (1.9)1.00
  ST segment depression, No. (%)3 (3.3)1 (2.6)2 (3.8)1.00
  T wave inversion, No. (%)14 (15.4)1 (2.6)13 (24.5)0.01
 Laboratory findings on ICU admission, median (IQR)c
  Hs-cTnId, pg/mL33 (15–119)12 (7–18)112 (54–260) < 0.001
  BNP, pg/mL37 (18–116)20 (13–59)78 (25–188) < 0.001
  Creatinine, micromol/L80 (67–128)74 (60–82)102 (70–199) < 0.001
  C-reactive protein, mg/L190 (117– 271)180 (116–249)192 (121–275)0.70
  Leukocytes, G/L−18.43 (6.06 11.06)8.80 (5.97– 12.79)8.16 (6.65–10.34)0.25
 Initial transthoracic echocardiographye, No. (%)
  Left ventricular ejection fraction, median (IQR), %60 (50–60)60 (55–60)55 (50–60)0.02
   Normal (LVEF ≥ 50%), No. (%)74 (87.1)33 (94.3)41 (82)0.11
   Mildly to Moderately impaired (LVEF 49–31%), No. (%)7 (8.2)2 (5.7)5 (10)0.69
   Severely impaired (≤ 30%), No. (%)4 (4.7)04 (8)0.14
  Right ventricular severe dilatation, No. (%) f2 (2.4)0 (0.0)2 (4.1)0.51
  Pericardial effusion, No. (%) g16 (20.0)4 (11.4)12 (26.7)0.16
Initial severity and organ failure management
 SAPS II score, median (IQR)40 (34–49)37 (28–41)45 (37–54) < 0.001
 SOFA score, median (IQR)7 (4–8)5 (3–7)8 (6–10) < 0.001
 Catecholamine, No. (%)59 (64.1)20 (51.3)39 (73.6)0.05
 Invasive mechanical ventilation, No. (%)83 (90.2)31 (79.5)52 (98.1)0.004
 Renal replacement therapy, No. (%)23 (25.0)5 (12.8)18 (34.0)0.03
 ECMOh, No. (%)6 (6.5)2 (5.1)4 (7.5)1.00
Outcomes at day-28
 Cardio-vascular event, No. (%)23 (25.0)4 (10.3)19 (35.8)0.01
  Death from any cause, No. (%)18 (19.6)4 (10.3)14 (26.4)0.07
  Cardiac arrest from cardiogenic origin, No. (%)1 (1.1)0 (0.0)1 (1.9)1.00
  Cardiogenic shocki, No. (%)4 (4.3)0 (0.0)4 (7.5)0.13
  Arterial thrombotic eventj, No. (%)4 (4.3)0 (0.0)4 (7.5)0.13
 ICU-free daysk, median (IQR), days0 (0–15)5 (0–20)0 (0–8)0.03

Characteristics of patients are compared with Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, according to acute myocardial injury

ACEI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, BNP binding natriuretic protein, ED emergency department, Hs-cTnI high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, ICU intensive care unit, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SOFA Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Vv/Va-ECMO venovenous/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;

aMissing data: Time to ICU admission from symptoms onset for 1 patient, Electrocardiography for 1 patient, B-type natriuretic peptide for 4 patients, left ventricular systolic ejection fraction for 7 patients, right ventricular dilatation for 8 patients, pericardial effusion for 12 patients

bPercutaneous coronary intervention, n = 9; Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, n = 3

cHighest values during the first 48 h from intensive care unit admission;

dMeasured with the Abbott Architect Method (Abbott, Lake Forest, IL 60,045, USA) wherein the 99th percentile for a normal population is 26 ng/ml [3]

eMedian (IQR) time from ICU admission: 0 (0–1) day; performed by trained operators with competence in advanced critical care TTE

fRight ventricular severe dilatation: end-diastolic area ratio ≥ 1; paradoxical interventricular septum, n = 0

gPericardial tamponade, n = 0

hVv-ECMO, n = 5; Va-ECMO, n = 1 (in the acute myocardial injury group)

iPatients fulfilled the following criteria: mean atrial pressure < 65 mm Hg without a vasopressor agent or need for vasopressor therapy to correct hypotension, low cardiac output, left ventricular systolic dysfunction without inotrope support; elevation of left heart pressures, at least one evidence of tissue hypo-perfusion

jIschaemic stroke, n = 3; non-cerebrovascular thromboembolism, n = 1

kCalculated as 28 minus the length of ICU stay

Fig. 1

Kaplan–Meier curves for overall mortality at day 28 as a function of the presence of an acute myocardial injury (log-rank test: p = 0.05). ICU, intensive care unit

Fig. 2

Probability of overall mortality at day 28 as a function of High sensitivity cardiac Troponin-I initiala values. Hs-cTnI high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, ICU intensive care unit. The bars represent the proportions of patients who died up to day 28 with their 95% confidence interval, according to their Hs-cTnI on ICU admission. Patient count in each Hs-cTnI class is reported above bars. aHighest values during the first 48 h of ICU admission

Characteristics, management, and outcome at day 28 of patients with COVID-19 Characteristics of patients are compared with Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, according to acute myocardial injury ACEI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, BNP binding natriuretic protein, ED emergency department, Hs-cTnI high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, ICU intensive care unit, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SOFA Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Vv/Va-ECMO venovenous/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; aMissing data: Time to ICU admission from symptoms onset for 1 patient, Electrocardiography for 1 patient, B-type natriuretic peptide for 4 patients, left ventricular systolic ejection fraction for 7 patients, right ventricular dilatation for 8 patients, pericardial effusion for 12 patients bPercutaneous coronary intervention, n = 9; Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, n = 3 cHighest values during the first 48 h from intensive care unit admission; dMeasured with the Abbott Architect Method (Abbott, Lake Forest, IL 60,045, USA) wherein the 99th percentile for a normal population is 26 ng/ml [3] eMedian (IQR) time from ICU admission: 0 (0–1) day; performed by trained operators with competence in advanced critical care TTE fRight ventricular severe dilatation: end-diastolic area ratio ≥ 1; paradoxical interventricular septum, n = 0 gPericardial tamponade, n = 0 hVv-ECMO, n = 5; Va-ECMO, n = 1 (in the acute myocardial injury group) iPatients fulfilled the following criteria: mean atrial pressure < 65 mm Hg without a vasopressor agent or need for vasopressor therapy to correct hypotension, low cardiac output, left ventricular systolic dysfunction without inotrope support; elevation of left heart pressures, at least one evidence of tissue hypo-perfusion jIschaemic stroke, n = 3; non-cerebrovascular thromboembolism, n = 1 kCalculated as 28 minus the length of ICU stay Kaplan–Meier curves for overall mortality at day 28 as a function of the presence of an acute myocardial injury (log-rank test: p = 0.05). ICU, intensive care unit Probability of overall mortality at day 28 as a function of High sensitivity cardiac Troponin-I initiala values. Hs-cTnI high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, ICU intensive care unit. The bars represent the proportions of patients who died up to day 28 with their 95% confidence interval, according to their Hs-cTnI on ICU admission. Patient count in each Hs-cTnI class is reported above bars. aHighest values during the first 48 h of ICU admission In this cohort of consecutive critically ill COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of MI was higher than that reported in non-ICU patients, suggesting that MI is related to an overall severity and a poor prognosis [1, 2]. Despite its association with an increased BNP level and a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, MI rarely induced severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Severe right ventricular dilatation was also rarely diagnosed in our cohort, despite severe acute respiratory disease requiring mechanical ventilation. In line with our results, an international survey in COVID 19 patients reported left and right ventricular severe impairment in only 9% and 6% of cases [4]. As suggested by the absence of ECG abnormalities in most of our patients, MI may be mediated through non-ischemic mechanisms, such as cytokine storm or direct entry of SARS-CoV-2 into myocardial cells [5]. However, coronary mechanisms like microvascular damage, supply–demand inequity, or destabilization of atheroma cannot be excluded [2, 5]. To summarize, acute myocardial injury is very frequent in critically ill COVID-19 patients and is associated with severity. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 Figure E1. Daily High sensitivity cardiac troponin-I value (logarithmic scale) according to the vital status at day 28. Footnote Figure E1: Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit; Hs-cTnI, High sensitivity cardiac troponin-I. amissing data: day 1, 0; day 2, 2; day 3, 8; day 4, 20; day 5, 28; day 6, 34; day 7, 29. (PDF 30 KB)
  5 in total

Review 1.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays: From improved analytical performance to enhanced risk stratification.

Authors:  Marek Kozinski; Magdalena Krintus; Jacek Kubica; Grazyna Sypniewska
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 2.  COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Justin A Fried; Jayant Raikhelkar; Gabriel Sayer; Jan M Griffin; Amirali Masoumi; Sneha S Jain; Daniel Burkhoff; Deepa Kumaraiah; LeRoy Rabbani; Allan Schwartz; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Anda Bularga; Rebecca T Hahn; Rong Bing; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Audrey White; Giovanni Di Salvo; Leyla Elif Sade; Keith Pearce; David E Newby; Bogdan A Popescu; Erwan Donal; Bernard Cosyns; Thor Edvardsen; Nicholas L Mills; Kristina Haugaa
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Prevalence and Impact of Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Anuradha Lala; Kipp W Johnson; James L Januzzi; Adam J Russak; Ishan Paranjpe; Felix Richter; Shan Zhao; Sulaiman Somani; Tielman Van Vleck; Akhil Vaid; Fayzan Chaudhry; Jessica K De Freitas; Zahi A Fayad; Sean P Pinney; Matthew Levin; Alexander Charney; Emilia Bagiella; Jagat Narula; Benjamin S Glicksberg; Girish Nadkarni; Donna M Mancini; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cardiac injury is associated with mortality and critically ill pneumonia in COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anwar Santoso; Raymond Pranata; Arief Wibowo; Makhyan Jibril Al-Farabi; Ian Huang; Budhi Antariksa
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.469

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19-related echocardiographic patterns of cardiovascular dysfunction in critically ill patients: A systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Filippo Sanfilippo; Angelo Milani; Lorenzo Calabrò; Katerina Negri; Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Marinella Astuto; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Colchicine for the Treatment of Cardiac Injury in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease-19.

Authors:  Amir Rabbani; Asim Rafique; Xiaoyan Wang; Danielle Campbell; Daniel Wang; Nicholas Brownell; Kenia Capdevilla; Victoria Garabedian; Sandra Chaparro; Raul Herrera; Rushi V Parikh; Reza Ardehali
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.