Literature DB >> 33389521

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of intramuscular and oral dexamethasone and betamethasone in Indian women.

Wojciech Krzyzanski1, Mark A Milad2, Alan H Jobe3, Thomas Peppard4, Robert R Bies1, William J Jusko5.   

Abstract

Population analysis of pharmacokinetic data for five differing dosage forms and routes for dexamethasone and betamethasone in 48 healthy nonpregnant Indian women was performed that accounted for a partial and complex cross-over design. Single doses of 6 mg dexamethasone phosphate (DEX-P), betamethasone phosphate (BET-P), or 1:1 mixture of betamethasone phosphate and acetate (BET-PA) were administered orally (PO) or intramuscularly (IM). Plasma concentrations collected for two periods over 96 h were described with a two-compartment model with differing PO and IM first-order absorption inputs. Clearances and volumes were divided by the IM bioavailability [Formula: see text]. The homogeneous ages, body weights, and ethnicity of the women obviated covariate analysis. Parameter estimates were obtained by the Laplace estimation method implemented in NONMEM 7.4. Typical values for dexamethasone were clearance ([Formula: see text] of 9.29 L/h, steady-state volume ([Formula: see text] of 56.4 L, IM absorption constant [Formula: see text] of 0.460 1/h and oral absorption constant ([Formula: see text] of 0.936 1/h. Betamethasone parameters were CL/FIM of 5.95 L/h, [Formula: see text] of 72.4 L, [Formula: see text] of 0.971 1/h, and [Formula: see text] of 1.21 1/h. The PO to IM F values were close to 1.0 for both drugs. The terminal half-lives averaged about 7.5 h for DEX, 17 h for BET, and 78 h for BET from BET-PA with the latter reflecting very slow release of BET from the acetate ester. Overall, BET exhibited slower clearance, larger volume of distribution, faster absorption, and longer persistence than DEX. These data may be useful in considering exposures when substituting one form of corticosteroid for another.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Betamethasone; Dexamethasone; Pharmacokinetics; Population modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389521      PMCID: PMC7778726          DOI: 10.1007/s10928-020-09730-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  3 in total

1.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics of Dexamethasone in Rats.

Authors:  Dawei Song; Le Sun; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; Shengnan Meng; William J Jusko
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  Metabolism of dexamethasone in the human kidney: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent 11beta-reduction.

Authors:  S Diederich; B Hanke; W Oelkers; V Bähr
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  After 62 years of regulating immunity, dexamethasone meets COVID-19.

Authors:  Derek W Cain; John A Cidlowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 53.106

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Across-species meta-analysis of dexamethasone pharmacokinetics utilizing allometric and scaling modeling approaches.

Authors:  Dawei Song; William J Jusko
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 2.  Role of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone Corticosteroids in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalized Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Jyoti Mehta; Rajan Rolta; Brij Bhushan Mehta; Neha Kaushik; Eun Ha Choi; Nagendra Kumar Kaushik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.