Literature DB >> 33389117

Predatory publishing and journals: how to address a profitable and ubiquitous business.

F Chirico1, N Magnavita2.   

Abstract

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389117     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04684-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Fifty years of impact factor: pros and cons].

Authors:  N Magnavita
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.275

2.  The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment.

Authors:  Kelly D Cobey; James Galipeau; Larissa Shamseer; David Moher
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  "Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process.

Authors:  Francesco Chirico
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-07
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Predatory journals: temporary inconvenience or permanent disruption?

Authors:  Harsh Deora; Manjul Tripathi; Bipin Chaurasia; J André Grotenhuis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Research ethics committees: A forum where scientists, editors, and policymakers can cooperate during pandemics.

Authors:  Francesco Chirico; Katrina A Bramstedt
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.