Literature DB >> 33388973

Uniportal Versus Multiportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Dimitrios E Magouliotis1,2,3, Maria P Fergadi4, Kyriakos Spiliopoulos5, Kalliopi Athanassiadi6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the available literature on patients with lung cancer undergoing either uniportal (UVATS) or multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (MVATS).
METHODS: Original research studies that evaluated perioperative and long-term outcomes of UVATS versus MVATS were identified, from January 1990 to April 2020. The perioperative, along with the oncologic and long-term survival outcomes, were calculated according to either a fixed or a random effect model, appropriately. The Q statistics and I2 statistic were used to test for heterogeneity among the studies.
RESULTS: Twenty studies were included, incorporating a total of 1,469 patients treated with UVATS and 3,231 treated with MVATS. The incidence of complications was lower in patients treated with UVATS [OR: 0.76 (95% CI 0.62, 0.93); p = 0.008]. The chest tube duration was significantly lower in the UVATS group (WMD: - 0.63 [95% CI - 1.03, - 0.23]; p = 0.002). Length of hospital stay (L.O.S.) was also lower in the UVATS patient group (WMD: - 0.54 [- 0.94, - 0.13]; p = 0.009), along with postoperative pain [WMD: - 0.57 (95% CI - 0.97, - 0.18); p = 0.004]. No significant differences were found regarding the mean operative time (M.O.T.), mean blood loss, the number of resected lymph nodes, the 30-day mortality, along with the survival at 1 and 3 years postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis indicates that UVATS is associated with enhanced outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer. Well-designed, randomized studies, comparing UVATS to MVATS, are necessary to further assess their long-term clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Single incision; Uniportal; Uvats; Vats; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388973      PMCID: PMC7929953          DOI: 10.1007/s00408-020-00411-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   2.584


  19 in total

1.  Evolving from conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy to uniportal: the story behind the evolution.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Eva Fieira; Maria Delgado; Lucía Mendez; Ricardo Fernandez; Mercedes de la Torre
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Outcomes of Uniportal vs Multiportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

Authors:  Etienne Bourdages-Pageau; Arthur Vieira; Yves Lacasse; Paula Ugalde Figueroa
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Comparison of single port versus multiport thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Authors:  Kook Nam Han; Hyun Koo Kim; Young Ho Choi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an alternative to conventional thoracoscopic lobectomy in lung cancer surgery?

Authors:  Jae Ho Chung; Yong Soo Choi; Jong Ho Cho; Hong Kwan Kim; Jhingook Kim; Jae Ill Zo; Young Mog Shim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-03

5.  Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched comparative analysis.

Authors:  Fuqiang Dai; Shenglan Meng; Longyong Mei; Chen Guan; Zheng Ma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of lung cancer: a Canadian single-centre retrospective study

Authors:  Tarek A. Bin Yameen; Vaibhav Gupta; Abdollah Behzadi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Mamdoh Al-Ameri; Erik Sachs; Ulrik Sartipy; Veronica Jackson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Anterior fissureless uniport vs. posterior intra-fissure triple-port thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy: a propensity-matched study.

Authors:  Honggang Ke; Yifei Liu; Xiaoyu Zhou; Qun Xue
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: An alternative surgical method for pulmonary carcinoma.

Authors:  Fengwu Lin; Chuan Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Kunpeng Cheng; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Feasibility and Safety of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Woon Heo; Do Kyun Kang; Ho-Ki Min; Hee Jae Jun; Youn-Ho Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Single utility port approach in robot-assisted sleeve segmentectomy for bronchial carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  Ao Liu; Yandong Zhao; Tong Qiu; Yunpeng Xuan; Yi Qin; Xiao Sun; Rongjian Xu; Wenxing Du; Wenjie Jiao
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Short-Term Surgical Outcomes for Lobectomy Between Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lin Xu; Hongda Lu; Anqun Ma; Gongchao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Decreased postoperative complications, neuropathic pain and epidural anesthesia-free effect of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection: a single-center initial experience of 100 cases.

Authors:  Takahiro Homma; Yoshifumi Shimada; Keitaro Tanabe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  LUNG Year in Review: 2021.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.777

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.