Eimear Ruane-McAteer1, Gillian Prue2. 1. School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. eimear.ruanemcateer@ucc.ie. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Abstract
AIM: The objective of this paper was to discuss the psychological impact of active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) and the resulting implications of psychological wellbeing for treatment decision making and acceptance of AS protocols. METHOD: Qualitative and quantitative research in the area of anxiety, depression, and distress is discussed drawing from PCa literature as well other health conditions from which parallels can be drawn. RESULTS: Attention is given to the role of the clinician in treatment decision making, including the value of information provision, and perceived trust in the AS as a management approach. CONCLUSION: Given that research is conflicted regarding the psychological impact of AS for PCa, it is suggested that focus shifts away from debate of the 'true' experience of AS rather researchers and clinicians should seek to identify the factors associated with positive and negative psychological response to diagnosis and AS to improve psychological and physical outcomes. Recommendations for clinical practice are discussed.
AIM: The objective of this paper was to discuss the psychological impact of active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) and the resulting implications of psychological wellbeing for treatment decision making and acceptance of AS protocols. METHOD: Qualitative and quantitative research in the area of anxiety, depression, and distress is discussed drawing from PCa literature as well other health conditions from which parallels can be drawn. RESULTS: Attention is given to the role of the clinician in treatment decision making, including the value of information provision, and perceived trust in the AS as a management approach. CONCLUSION: Given that research is conflicted regarding the psychological impact of AS for PCa, it is suggested that focus shifts away from debate of the 'true' experience of AS rather researchers and clinicians should seek to identify the factors associated with positive and negative psychological response to diagnosis and AS to improve psychological and physical outcomes. Recommendations for clinical practice are discussed.
Authors: Omar Eymech; Oliver Brunckhorst; Louis Fox; Anam Jawaid; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Robert Stewart; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Liliana Vartolomei; Andrei Cotruș; Camelia Stanciu; Cristian Delcea; Marco Tozzi; Elena Lievore; Felice Crocetto; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Matteo Muto; Matteo Ferro Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 4.964