Yongquan Wang1, Zhengchao Liu1, Tao Jiang1, Xiaozhou Zhou1, Zhipeng Chen1, Jun Zheng1, Dishi Yan1, Yuanxiu Zhou1, Zhansong Zhou2, Wenhao Shen3. 1. Urological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. 2. Urological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. zhouzhansong@sohu.com. 3. Urological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. chongqingswh@aliyun.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the novel technique of photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate (PSEP) with a front-firing 532-nm laser and evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: A seven-step standardized surgical procedure was established, and PSEP was performed in an en bloc or lobulate manner according to the size of the middle lobe of the prostate. The following clinical data of 583 patients who underwent PSEP in our center from November 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed: maximum flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score (Qols), post-void residual volume (PVR), prostate volume, operation time, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, and complications at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 583 patients, 475 had complete clinical information and were included in the study. The median operation time was 39 min. There were significant improvements in the Qmax, IPSS, Qols, PVR and PSA concentration at each follow-up time point postoperatively. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 22 patients (4.6%), urinary retention in 29 (6.1%), urinary tract infection in 55 (11.6%), bladder neck contracture in 8 (1.7%), urethral strictures in 11 (2.3%), and stress urinary incontinence in 9 (1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: PSEP is effective and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The innovative technique integrates the excellent hemostatic property of the 532-nm laser and the high efficiency of enucleation. It decreases the occurrence of postoperative incontinence associated with "blunt" enucleation of 532-nm laser and eliminates the lack of tissue samples problem associated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate.
PURPOSE: To describe the novel technique of photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate (PSEP) with a front-firing 532-nm laser and evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: A seven-step standardized surgical procedure was established, and PSEP was performed in an en bloc or lobulate manner according to the size of the middle lobe of the prostate. The following clinical data of 583 patients who underwent PSEP in our center from November 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed: maximum flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score (Qols), post-void residual volume (PVR), prostate volume, operation time, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, and complications at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 583 patients, 475 had complete clinical information and were included in the study. The median operation time was 39 min. There were significant improvements in the Qmax, IPSS, Qols, PVR and PSA concentration at each follow-up time point postoperatively. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 22 patients (4.6%), urinary retention in 29 (6.1%), urinary tract infection in 55 (11.6%), bladder neck contracture in 8 (1.7%), urethral strictures in 11 (2.3%), and stress urinary incontinence in 9 (1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: PSEP is effective and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The innovative technique integrates the excellent hemostatic property of the 532-nm laser and the high efficiency of enucleation. It decreases the occurrence of postoperative incontinence associated with "blunt" enucleation of 532-nm laser and eliminates the lack of tissue samples problem associated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate.
Authors: Ahmed M Elshal; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M Shoma; Adel Nabeeh; Serge Carrier; Mostafa M Elhilali Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Eric Belleville; Khaled Ajib; Franck Bruyere; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai; Dean Elterman; Vincent Misrai; Kevin C Zorn Journal: BJU Int Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Pierre-Alain Hueber; Tal Ben-Zvi; Daniel Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Gagan Gautam; Tom Deklaj; Mark Katz; Kevin C Zorn Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.344
Authors: Benjamin V Stone; Bilal Chughtai; James C Forde; Andrew W Tam; Patrick Lewicki; Alexis E Te Journal: J Endourol Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Frédéric Panthier; Jennifer Pasquier; Sébastien Bruel; Vidal Azancot; Alexandre De La Taille; Daniel Gasman Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Fernando Gomez Sancha; Vanesa Cuadros Rivera; Georgi Georgiev; Alexander Botsevski; Julian Kotsev; Thomas Herrmann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mohammad Hout; Aaron Gurayah; Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez; Ruben Blachman-Braun; Khushi Shah; Thomas R W Herrmann; Hemendra N Shah Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 3.661