Literature DB >> 33388913

Anastomosis quality score during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new simple tool to maximize postoperative management.

Francesco Porpiglia1, Enrico Checcucci2,3, Matteo Manfredi1, Cristian Fiori1, Sabrina De Cillis1, Daniele Amparore1, Angela Pecoraro1, Alberto Piana1, Stefano Granato1, Paolo Verri1, Michele Sica1, Federico Piramide1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The urethro-vesical anastomosis represents one of the most challenging steps of robotic prostatectomy (RARP). To maximize postoperative management, we specifically designed our anastomosis quality score (AQS), based on the intraoperative characteristics of the urethra and bladder neck.
METHODS: This is a prospective study, conducted from April 2019 to March 2020. All the patients were classified into three different AQS categories (low, intermediate, high) based on the quality of the anastomosis. The postoperative management was modulated accordingly.
RESULTS: We enrolled 333 patients. According to AQS, no differences were recorded in intraoperative complications (p = 0.9). Median hospital stay and catheterization time were longer in AQS 1 group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the occurrence of postoperative complication was higher in AQS 1 category (p = 0.002) but, when focusing on the complications related to the quality of the anastomosis, no differences were found neither for acute urinary retention (p = 0.12) nor urine leakage (p = 0.11). Finally, concerning the continence recovery, no significant differences were found among the three groups for each time point. The highest potency recovery rate at one month of follow-up was recorded in AQS 3 category (p = 0. 03).
CONCLUSION: The AQS proposed revealed to be a valid too to intraoperatively categorize patients who underwent RARP on the basis of the urethral and bladder neck features. The modulated postoperative management for each specific score category allowed to limit the occurrence of complications and to maximize the functional outcomes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Continence recovery; Postoperative complications; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robot-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388913     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03549-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  10 in total

1.  Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures.

Authors:  Matteo Manfredi; Enrico Checcucci; Cristian Fiori; Diletta Garrou; Roberta Aimar; Daniele Amparore; Stefano De Luca; Sabrina Bombaci; Ilaria Stura; Giuseppe Migliaretti; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Technical details to achieve perfect early continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matteo Manfredi; Cristian Fiori; Daniele Amparore; Enrico Checcucci; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The narrow vesicourethral angle measured on postoperative cystography can predict urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Motohiko Sugi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Takashi Yoshida; Hisanori Taniguchi; Takao Mishima; Kenji Yoshida; Masaaki Yanishi; Yoshihiro Komai; Masato Watanabe; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.612

5.  Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique.

Authors:  Alaa Hamada; Shirin Razdan; Mohamed H Etafy; Randy Fagin; Sanjay Razdan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Coughlin; John W Yaxley; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Patrick Teloken; Nigel Dunglison; Scott Williams; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  The Use of Unidirectional Barbed Suture for Urethrovesical Anastomosis during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Huixin Li; Chunxiao Liu; Haibin Zhang; Wenfeng Xu; Jianhua Liu; Yong Chen; Tangxuan Li; Bin Li; Zhenquan Wu; Taolin Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xueyou Ma; Kun Tang; Chunguang Yang; Guanqing Wu; Nan Xu; Meng Wang; Xing Zeng; Zhiquan Hu; Ranran Song; Bertram Yuh; Zhihua Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Prashanth Rawla
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2019-04-20

10.  Urethral realignment with maximal urethral length and bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Urinary continence recovery.

Authors:  Ji Eun Heo; Jong Soo Lee; Hyeok Jun Goh; Won Sik Jang; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Patient characteristics predicting prolonged length of hospital stay following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Albert El Hajj; Muhieddine Labban; Guillaume Ploussard; Jabra Zarka; Nassib Abou Heidar; Aurelie Mailhac; Hani Tamim
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-03-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.