Literature DB >> 33388816

When the non-dominant arm dominates: the effects of visual information and task experience on speed-accuracy advantages.

Brooke Dexheimer1, Robert Sainburg2,3.   

Abstract

Speed accuracy trade-off, the inverse relationship between movement speed and task accuracy, is a ubiquitous feature of skilled motor performance. Many previous studies have focused on the dominant arm, unimanual performance in both simple tasks, such as target reaching, and complex tasks, such as overarm throwing. However, while handedness is a prominent feature of human motor performance, the effect of limb dominance on speed-accuracy relationships is not well-understood. Based on previous research, we hypothesize that dominant arm skilled performance should depend on visual information and prior task experience, and that the non-dominant arm should show greater skill when no visual information nor prior task information is available. Forty right-handed young adults reached to 32 randomly presented targets across a virtual reality workspace with either the left or the right arm. Half of the participants received no visual feedback about hand position throughout each reach. Sensory information and task experience were lowest during the first cycle of exposure (32 reaches) in the no-vision condition, in which visual information about motion was not available. Under this condition, we found that the left arm group showed greater skill, measured in terms of position error normalized to speed, and by error variability. However, as task experience and sensory information increased, the right arm group showed substantial improvements in speed-accuracy relations, while the left arm group maintained, but did not improve, speed-accuracy relations throughout the task. These differences in performance between dominant and non-dominant arm groups during the separate stages of the task are consistent with complimentary models of lateralization, which propose different proficiencies of each hemisphere for different features of control. Our results are incompatible with global dominance models of handedness that propose dominant arm advantages under all performance conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Handedness; Lateralization; Reaching; Speed-accuracy tradeoff

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388816      PMCID: PMC8063124          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; P W Halligan; C D Frith; J Driver; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Opher Donchin; Michael S Gazzaniga; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

5.  Contextual interference: a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Frank Brady
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2004-08

6.  Physiological basis of limb-impedance modulation during free and constrained movements.

Authors:  Loïc Damm; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Efficiency of visual feedback integration differs between dominant and non-dominant arms during a reaching task.

Authors:  Gregory A Apker; Keith Dyson; Garrett Frantz; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands.

Authors:  J Annett; M Annett; P T Hudson; A Turner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 9.  The Role of Variability in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Ashesh K Dhawale; Maurice A Smith; Bence P Ölveczky
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reaction time asymmetries provide insight into mechanisms underlying dominant and non-dominant hand selection.

Authors:  Brooke Dexheimer; Andrzej Przybyla; Terrence E Murphy; Selcuk Akpinar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  The correlations between kinematic profiles and cerebral hemodynamics suggest changes of motor coordination in single and bilateral finger movement.

Authors:  Guangquan Zhou; Yuzhao Chen; Xiaohan Wang; Hao Wei; Qinghua Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.