Literature DB >> 33388643

Population model analysis of chiral inversion and degradation of bupropion enantiomers, and application to enantiomer specific fraction unbound determination in rat plasma and brain.

Chandrali Bhattacharya1, Andrea R Masters2, Christine Bach2, Robert E Stratford3.   

Abstract

Pharmacologic effects elicited by drugs most directly relate to their unbound concentrations. Measurement of binding in blood, plasma and target tissues are used to estimate these concentrations by determining the fraction of total concentration in a biological matrix that is not bound. In the case of attempting to estimate R- and S-bupropion concentrations in plasma and brain following racemic bupropion administration, reversible chiral inversion and irreversible degradation of the enantiomers were hypothesized to confound attempts at unbound fraction estimation. To address this possibility, a kinetic modeling approach was used to quantify inversion and degradation specific processes for each enantiomer from separate incubations of each enantiomer in the two matrices, and in pH 7.4 buffer, which is also used in binding experiments based on equilibrium dialysis. Modeling analyses indicated that chiral inversion kinetics were two to four-fold faster in plasma and brain than degradation, with only inversion observed in buffer. Inversion rate was faster for S-bupropion in the three media; whereas, degradation rates were similar for the two enantiomers in plasma and brain, with overall degradation in plasma approximately 2-fold higher than in brain homogenate. Incorporation of degradation and chiral inversion kinetic terms into a model to predict enantiomer-specific binding in plasma and brain revealed that, despite existence of these two processes, empirically derived estimates of fraction unbound were similar to model-derived values, leading to a firm conclusion that observed extent of plasma and brain binding are accurate largely because binding kinetics are faster than parallel degradation and chiral inversion processes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalysis; Bupropion; Chiral inversion; In vitro model; Kinetics; Pharmacokinetic modeling; Protein binding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33388643      PMCID: PMC7856023          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  20 in total

1.  Stability study of bupropion and olanzapine in formaldehyde solutions.

Authors:  Ramagiri Suma; Hari Kosanam; P K Sai Prakash
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Development of a Rat Plasma and Brain Extracellular Fluid Pharmacokinetic Model for Bupropion and Hydroxybupropion Based on Microdialysis Sampling, and Application to Predict Human Brain Concentrations.

Authors:  Thomas I F H Cremers; Gunnar Flik; Joost H A Folgering; Hans Rollema; Robert E Stratford
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Effects of hydroxymetabolites of bupropion on nicotine dependence behavior in mice.

Authors:  M Imad Damaj; Sheri D Grabus; Hernan A Navarro; Robert E Vann; Jonathan A Warner; Lindsey S King; Jenny L Wiley; Bruce E Blough; Ronald J Lukas; F Ivy Carroll
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Enantioselective effects of hydroxy metabolites of bupropion on behavior and on function of monoamine transporters and nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  M Imad Damaj; F Ivy Carroll; J Brek Eaton; Hernan A Navarro; Bruce E Blough; Sadiq Mirza; Ronald J Lukas; Billy R Martin
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Stereoselective metabolism of bupropion by cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6) and human liver microsomes.

Authors:  Rebecka Coles; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Stereoselective method to quantify bupropion and its three major metabolites, hydroxybupropion, erythro-dihydrobupropion, and threo-dihydrobupropion using HPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Andrea R Masters; Michael McCoy; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Comparison of In Vitro Stereoselective Metabolism of Bupropion in Human, Monkey, Rat, and Mouse Liver Microsomes.

Authors:  Chandrali Bhattacharya; Danielle Kirby; Michael Van Stipdonk; Robert E Stratford
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Synthesis and evaluation of the antidepressant activity of the enantiomers of bupropion.

Authors:  D L Musso; N B Mehta; F E Soroko; R M Ferris; E B Hollingsworth; B T Kenney
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.437

9.  Stability of bupropion and its major metabolites in human plasma.

Authors:  S C Laizure; C L DeVane
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Model Evaluation of Continuous Data Pharmacometric Models: Metrics and Graphics.

Authors:  T H T Nguyen; M-S Mouksassi; N Holford; N Al-Huniti; I Freedman; A C Hooker; J John; M O Karlsson; D R Mould; J J Pérez Ruixo; E L Plan; R Savic; J G C van Hasselt; B Weber; C Zhou; E Comets; F Mentré
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.