Marc A Manzo1, Dian-Shi Wang1, Winston W Li1, Arsène Pinguelo1, Mariana O Popa2, Shahin Khodaei1, John R Atack2, Ruth A Ross3, Beverley A Orser4. 1. Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Medicines Discovery Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales. 3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: beverley.orser@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple cognitive and psychiatric disorders are associated with an increased tonic inhibitory conductance that is generated by α5 subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A (α5 GABAA) receptors. Negative allosteric modulators that inhibit α5 GABAA receptors (α5-NAMs) are being developed as treatments for these disorders. The effects of α5-NAMs have been studied on recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in non-neuronal cells; however, no study has compared drug effects on the tonic conductance generated by native GABAA receptors in neurones, which was the goal of this study. METHODS: The effects of five α5-NAMs (basmisanil, Ono-160, L-655,708, α5IA, and MRK-016) on tonic current evoked by a low concentration of GABA were studied using whole-cell recordings in cultured mouse hippocampal neurones. Drug effects on current evoked by a saturating concentration of GABA and on miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were also examined. RESULTS: The α5-NAMs caused a concentration-dependent decrease in tonic current. The potencies varied as the inhibitory concentration for 50% inhibition (IC50) of basmisanil (127 nM) was significantly higher than those of the other compounds (0.4-0.8 nM). In contrast, the maximal efficacies of the drugs were similar (35.5-51.3% inhibition). The α5-NAMs did not modify current evoked by a saturating GABA concentration or mIPSCs. CONCLUSIONS: Basmisanil was markedly less potent than the other α5-NAMs, an unexpected result based on studies of recombinant α5 GABAA receptors. Studying the effects of α5 GABAA receptor-selective drugs on the tonic inhibitory current in neurones could inform the selection of compounds for future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Multiple cognitive and psychiatric disorders are associated with an increased tonic inhibitory conductance that is generated by α5 subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A (α5 GABAA) receptors. Negative allosteric modulators that inhibit α5 GABAA receptors (α5-NAMs) are being developed as treatments for these disorders. The effects of α5-NAMs have been studied on recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in non-neuronal cells; however, no study has compared drug effects on the tonic conductance generated by native GABAA receptors in neurones, which was the goal of this study. METHODS: The effects of five α5-NAMs (basmisanil, Ono-160, L-655,708, α5IA, and MRK-016) on tonic current evoked by a low concentration of GABA were studied using whole-cell recordings in cultured mouse hippocampal neurones. Drug effects on current evoked by a saturating concentration of GABA and on miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were also examined. RESULTS: The α5-NAMs caused a concentration-dependent decrease in tonic current. The potencies varied as the inhibitory concentration for 50% inhibition (IC50) of basmisanil (127 nM) was significantly higher than those of the other compounds (0.4-0.8 nM). In contrast, the maximal efficacies of the drugs were similar (35.5-51.3% inhibition). The α5-NAMs did not modify current evoked by a saturating GABA concentration or mIPSCs. CONCLUSIONS:Basmisanil was markedly less potent than the other α5-NAMs, an unexpected result based on studies of recombinant α5 GABAA receptors. Studying the effects of α5 GABAA receptor-selective drugs on the tonic inhibitory current in neurones could inform the selection of compounds for future clinical trials.
Authors: Sai Surthi Konduru; Yu-Zhen Pan; Eli Wallace; Jesse A Pfammatter; Mathew V Jones; Rama K Maganti Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jessica L Nuwer; Megan L Brady; Nadya V Povysheva; Amanda Coyne; Tija C Jacob Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 5.250