Literature DB >> 33388032

Characteristics of patients who access zero, one or multiple general practices and reasons for their choices: a study in regional Australia.

Kristen M Glenister1, John Guymer2, Lisa Bourke3, David Simmons3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most people in Australia visit a General Practitioner each year and are free to choose their General Practitioner and/or practice on each occasion. A proportion of people visit multiple general practices, which can reduce continuity of care, a core value of general practice. Utilisation of multiple general practices is associated with metropolitan residence and younger age. However, it is unclear which factors are associated with utilisation of multiple general practices in rural areas, where there are often General Practitioner workforce shortages and higher proportions of patients who may benefit from continuity of care, including older people and people living with chronic disease. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of people in a rural Australian area who accessed multiple general practices in the previous year with people who had accessed one practice, or none.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey assessed self-reported utilisation and perspective of general practice services, uses of multiple practices, associated reasons, lifestyle advice and screening services received in four regional Victorian towns. Households were randomly selected and residents aged 16+ were eligible to participate in the adult survey.
RESULTS: Most people had attended a single general practice (78.9%), while 14.4% attended more than one practice and 6.7% attended no practices in the previous 12 months. Compared with utilisation of a single general practice, multiple general practice attendance in the previous year was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR 95% confidence interval) 0.98 per year (0.97-0.99), residence in the regional centre aOR 2.90(2.22-3.78), emergency department (ED) attendance in the last 12 months aOR 1.65(1.22-2.21) and no out of pocket costs aOR 1.36(1.04-1.79)). Reasons for multiple general practice attendance included availability of appointments, cost and access to specific services. Compared with multiple general practice attendance, those attending single practices reported more screening tests but similar frequency of lifestyle advice. People who accessed multiple practices were less likely to report very high satisfaction (51.7% vs 62.9% p < 0.001) or excellent degree of confidence in their doctor (42.0% vs 49.8% p = 0.006) than single practice attendees.
CONCLUSIONS: Those attending single practices report higher satisfaction and confidence in their GP and were less likely to attend ED. Further studies are required to test whether increasing availability of appointments and reducing out-of-pocket expenses would increase single practice attendance and/or decrease healthcare costs overall.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuity of care; General practice; Lifestyle; Preventative health; Rural; Screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388032      PMCID: PMC7777414          DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01341-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Fam Pract        ISSN: 1471-2296            Impact factor:   2.497


  21 in total

1.  Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  David Turner; Carolyn Tarrant; Kate Windridge; Stirling Bryan; Mary Boulton; George Freeman; Richard Baker
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-07

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Continuity of care: why it matters and what we can do.

Authors:  Alexandra Hofer; Malcolm McDonald
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.307

4.  Barriers to accessing primary health care: comparing Australian experiences internationally.

Authors:  Lisa Corscadden; Jean-Frederic Levesque; Virginia Lewis; Mylaine Breton; Kim Sutherland; Jan-Willem Weenink; Jeannie Haggerty; Grant Russell
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.307

5.  Developing a general practice workforce for the future.

Authors:  Richard Hays; Tarun Sen Gupta
Journal:  Aust J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08

6.  Consumer use of multiple general practitioners: an Australian epidemiological study.

Authors:  B M Veale; J McCallum; D C Saltman; J Lonergan; Y J Wadsworth; R M Douglas
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Do English patients want continuity of care, and do they receive it?

Authors:  Ahmed Aboulghate; Gary Abel; Marc N Elliott; Richard A Parker; John Campbell; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia--who is and who is not and does it matter?

Authors:  Ian McRae; Laurann Yen; James Gillespie; Kirsty Douglas
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Why do men go to the doctor? Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with healthcare utilisation among a cohort of Australian men.

Authors:  Marisa Schlichthorst; Lena A Sanci; Jane Pirkis; Matthew J Spittal; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Preventive care in general practice among healthy older New South Wales residents.

Authors:  Mark F Harris; Fakhrul Md Islam; Bin Jalaludin; Jack Chen; Adrian E Bauman; Elizabeth J Comino
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.