Jacob F Norman1, Bahar Rahsepar2, Jad Noueihed2, John A White2. 1. Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Systems Neuroscience, Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, United States. Electronic address: jfnorman@bu.edu. 2. Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Systems Neuroscience, Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence imaging is a widely used technique that permits for cell-type-specific recording from hundreds of neurons simultaneously. Often, to obtain cell-type-specific recordings from more than one cell type, researchers add an additional fluorescent protein to mark a second neuronal subpopulation. Currently, however, no consensus exists on the best expression method for multiple fluorescent proteins. NEW METHOD: We optimized the coexpression of two fluorescent proteins across multiple brain regions and mouse lines. RESULTS: The single-virus method, a viral injection in a double transgenic reporter mouse, results in limited fluorescent coexpression. In contrast the double-virus method, injecting a mixture of two viruses in a Cre driver mouse, results in up to 70 % coexpression of the fluorescent markers in vitro. Using the double-virus method allows for population activity recording and neuronal subpopulation determination. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The standard for expressing two fluorescent proteins is to use a double transgenic reporter mouse with a single viral injection. Injecting two viruses into a Cre driver mouse resulted in significantly higher coexpression compared to the standard method. This result generalized to multiple brain regions and mouse lines in vitro, as well as in vivo. CONCLUSION: Efficiently coexpressing multiple fluorescent proteins provides population activity while identifying a neuronal subpopulation of interest. The improved coexpression is applicable to a wide breadth of experiments, ranging from engram investigation to voltage imaging.
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence imaging is a widely used technique that permits for cell-type-specific recording from hundreds of neurons simultaneously. Often, to obtain cell-type-specific recordings from more than one cell type, researchers add an additional fluorescent protein to mark a second neuronal subpopulation. Currently, however, no consensus exists on the best expression method for multiple fluorescent proteins. NEW METHOD: We optimized the coexpression of two fluorescent proteins across multiple brain regions and mouse lines. RESULTS: The single-virus method, a viral injection in a double transgenic reporter mouse, results in limited fluorescent coexpression. In contrast the double-virus method, injecting a mixture of two viruses in a Cre driver mouse, results in up to 70 % coexpression of the fluorescent markers in vitro. Using the double-virus method allows for population activity recording and neuronal subpopulation determination. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The standard for expressing two fluorescent proteins is to use a double transgenic reporter mouse with a single viral injection. Injecting two viruses into a Cre driver mouse resulted in significantly higher coexpression compared to the standard method. This result generalized to multiple brain regions and mouse lines in vitro, as well as in vivo. CONCLUSION: Efficiently coexpressing multiple fluorescent proteins provides population activity while identifying a neuronal subpopulation of interest. The improved coexpression is applicable to a wide breadth of experiments, ranging from engram investigation to voltage imaging.
Authors: Conny H Tran; Michael Vaiana; Johan Nakuci; Ala Somarowthu; Kevin M Goff; Nitsan Goldstein; Priya Murthy; Sarah F Muldoon; Ethan M Goldberg Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Andrea Giovannucci; Johannes Friedrich; Pat Gunn; Jérémie Kalfon; Brandon L Brown; Sue Ann Koay; Jiannis Taxidis; Farzaneh Najafi; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Pengcheng Zhou; Baljit S Khakh; David W Tank; Dmitri B Chklovskii; Eftychios A Pnevmatikakis Journal: Elife Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Ahmed S Abdelfattah; Takashi Kawashima; Amrita Singh; Ondrej Novak; Hui Liu; Yichun Shuai; Yi-Chieh Huang; Luke Campagnola; Stephanie C Seeman; Jianing Yu; Jihong Zheng; Jonathan B Grimm; Ronak Patel; Johannes Friedrich; Brett D Mensh; Liam Paninski; John J Macklin; Gabe J Murphy; Kaspar Podgorski; Bei-Jung Lin; Tsai-Wen Chen; Glenn C Turner; Zhe Liu; Minoru Koyama; Karel Svoboda; Misha B Ahrens; Luke D Lavis; Eric R Schreiter Journal: Science Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kiryl D Piatkevich; Seth Bensussen; Hua-An Tseng; Sanaya N Shroff; Violeta Gisselle Lopez-Huerta; Demian Park; Erica E Jung; Or A Shemesh; Christoph Straub; Howard J Gritton; Michael F Romano; Emma Costa; Bernardo L Sabatini; Zhanyan Fu; Edward S Boyden; Xue Han Journal: Nature Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 49.962