Hye Joo Son1, Jungsu S Oh1, Minyoung Oh1, Sang Ju Lee1, Seung Jun Oh1, Sun Ju Chung2, Jae Seung Kim3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jaeskim@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 18F-labeled fluoropropyl-carbomethoxylodopropyl-nor-ß-tropane ([18F]FP-CIT) positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful tool for evaluating disease progression in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. We evaluated the test-retest reproducibility of [18F]FP-CIT PET measures in essential tremor (ET) and PD patients. METHODS: Fifteen ET (68.9 ± 6.6 years) and 10 PD patients (70.5 ± 6.3 years; Hoehn and Yahr stage, 2.3 ± 0.8) underwent two [18F]FP-CIT PET/CT scans with an interval of 48 ± 7 day. For both the test and retest studies, standardized uptake value ratios were estimated for 90-min and 3-h acquisitions for the caudate, anterior putamen, and posterior putamen using T1-MRI-based normalization (automatic) and fixed-VOI (manual) methods, with the occipital lobe as a reference. Reproducibility was evaluated by the bias, variability, percent test-retest, within-subject coefficient of variation, repeatability coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Reproducibility was excellent, with low variability (ET: 6.99-8.02%, PD: 3.51-6.94%) and high reliability (ICC; ET: 0.88-0.96, PD: 0.98-0.99). The ET group showed higher variability and lower ICCs than the PD group. The variability in the 90-min images (ET: 7.85-8.59%, PD: 1.52-2.75%) was comparable to that in the 3-h images (ET: 6.99-8.02%, PD: 3.51-6.94%). There were no differences in variability among the subregions in the ET group. In the PD group, the variability was high in the posterior putamen (automatic method: 6.94%, manual method: 11.80%). The test-retest variability and ICCs were similar for the manual and automatic methods. CONCLUSION: [18F]FP-CIT PET is reproducible for the quantitative measurement of DAT binding in both ET and PD individuals, independent of the acquisition time or analysis method. Also, the automatic method is more suitable for evaluating early loss of DAT binding in patients with PD.
OBJECTIVE: 18F-labeled fluoropropyl-carbomethoxylodopropyl-nor-ß-tropane ([18F]FP-CIT) positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful tool for evaluating disease progression in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. We evaluated the test-retest reproducibility of [18F]FP-CIT PET measures in essential tremor (ET) and PDpatients. METHODS: Fifteen ET (68.9 ± 6.6 years) and 10 PDpatients (70.5 ± 6.3 years; Hoehn and Yahr stage, 2.3 ± 0.8) underwent two [18F]FP-CIT PET/CT scans with an interval of 48 ± 7 day. For both the test and retest studies, standardized uptake value ratios were estimated for 90-min and 3-h acquisitions for the caudate, anterior putamen, and posterior putamen using T1-MRI-based normalization (automatic) and fixed-VOI (manual) methods, with the occipital lobe as a reference. Reproducibility was evaluated by the bias, variability, percent test-retest, within-subject coefficient of variation, repeatability coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Reproducibility was excellent, with low variability (ET: 6.99-8.02%, PD: 3.51-6.94%) and high reliability (ICC; ET: 0.88-0.96, PD: 0.98-0.99). The ET group showed higher variability and lower ICCs than the PD group. The variability in the 90-min images (ET: 7.85-8.59%, PD: 1.52-2.75%) was comparable to that in the 3-h images (ET: 6.99-8.02%, PD: 3.51-6.94%). There were no differences in variability among the subregions in the ET group. In the PD group, the variability was high in the posterior putamen (automatic method: 6.94%, manual method: 11.80%). The test-retest variability and ICCs were similar for the manual and automatic methods. CONCLUSION: [18F]FP-CIT PET is reproducible for the quantitative measurement of DAT binding in both ET and PD individuals, independent of the acquisition time or analysis method. Also, the automatic method is more suitable for evaluating early loss of DAT binding in patients with PD.
Authors: J Booij; J B Habraken; P Bergmans; G Tissingh; A Winogrodzka; E C Wolters; A G Janssen; J C Stoof; E A van Royen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: J P Seibyl; K Marek; K Sheff; R M Baldwin; S Zoghbi; Y Zea-Ponce; D S Charney; C H van Dyck; P B Hoffer; R B Innis Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S Asenbaum; T Brücke; W Pirker; I Podreka; P Angelberger; S Wenger; C Wöber; C Müller; L Deecke Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K Kazumata; V Dhawan; T Chaly; A Antonini; C Margouleff; A Belakhlef; J Neumeyer; D Eidelberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 10.057