Kenta Konishi1, Ryo Ishiba2, Tsutomu Ikenohira2, Tomoyuki Asao2, Masanori Hirata2, Keiichi Ohira2, Tetsuya Komatsu2, Michifumi Sawada3, Yukichi Tanahashi4, Satoshi Goshima4, Yasuhiro Magata5, Katsumasa Nakamura2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan. kkonishi@hama-med.ac.jp. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan. 5. Preeminent Medical Photonics Education and Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Iodine-131 (I-131) radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) after total thyroidectomy is the standard treatment for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We investigated the relationship between the quantitative parameters of the iodine uptake and the disappearance of the accumulation in the thyroid bed in adjuvant therapy using a 1.11 GBq or 3.70 GBq dose of I-131. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 40 patients with DTC who were treated with RAI at our institution between April 2017 and August 2019. The patients were treated with the I-131 dose of 1.11 GBq (n = 25) or 3.70 GBq (n = 15) after total thyroidectomy. The I-131 whole-body scan and hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/X-ray computed tomography (SPECT/CT) were performed 3 days after RAI. Using image analysis software, we measured the standardized uptake value (SUV) and absolute radioactivity concentration (kBq/ml) on the target lesions with the highest uptake in the thyroid bed. RESULTS: The median period from RAI to the evaluation of the absence of uptake of the thyroid bed was 6.75 months. After RAI, uptake of the thyroid bed disappeared in 26 of the 40 patients. The disappearance rate was significantly higher in the 3.70 GBq group than in the 1.11 GBq group (86.7% vs. 52.0%, respectively; p = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences in the values of kBq/ml or SUV between the 1.11 GBq group and 3.70 GBq group. On the other hand, the group in which the uptake disappeared after RAI showed significantly higher kBq/ml max and kBq/ml mean values than the group in which the uptake did not disappear after RAI (p = 0.028, p = 0.032, respectively). The SUVmax and SUVmean also tended to be higher in the disappeared-uptake group than the not-disappeared-uptake group, but the differences were not significant (p = 0.166, p = 0.176, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative evaluation might be useful as one of the predictive indicators of the disappearance of the accumulation of radioactive iodine in the thyroid bed.
OBJECTIVE:Iodine-131 (I-131) radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) after total thyroidectomy is the standard treatment for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We investigated the relationship between the quantitative parameters of the iodine uptake and the disappearance of the accumulation in the thyroid bed in adjuvant therapy using a 1.11 GBq or 3.70 GBq dose of I-131. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 40 patients with DTC who were treated with RAI at our institution between April 2017 and August 2019. The patients were treated with the I-131 dose of 1.11 GBq (n = 25) or 3.70 GBq (n = 15) after total thyroidectomy. The I-131 whole-body scan and hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/X-ray computed tomography (SPECT/CT) were performed 3 days after RAI. Using image analysis software, we measured the standardized uptake value (SUV) and absolute radioactivity concentration (kBq/ml) on the target lesions with the highest uptake in the thyroid bed. RESULTS: The median period from RAI to the evaluation of the absence of uptake of the thyroid bed was 6.75 months. After RAI, uptake of the thyroid bed disappeared in 26 of the 40 patients. The disappearance rate was significantly higher in the 3.70 GBq group than in the 1.11 GBq group (86.7% vs. 52.0%, respectively; p = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences in the values of kBq/ml or SUV between the 1.11 GBq group and 3.70 GBq group. On the other hand, the group in which the uptake disappeared after RAI showed significantly higher kBq/ml max and kBq/ml mean values than the group in which the uptake did not disappear after RAI (p = 0.028, p = 0.032, respectively). The SUVmax and SUVmean also tended to be higher in the disappeared-uptake group than the not-disappeared-uptake group, but the differences were not significant (p = 0.166, p = 0.176, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative evaluation might be useful as one of the predictive indicators of the disappearance of the accumulation of radioactive iodine in the thyroid bed.