Literature DB >> 33387216

Biochemical markers for clinical monitoring of tissue perfusion.

Marek Janotka1, Petr Ostadal2.   

Abstract

The assessment and monitoring of the tissue perfusion is extremely important in critical conditions involving circulatory shock. There is a wide range of established methods for the assessment of cardiac output as a surrogate of oxygen delivery to the peripheral tissues. However, the evaluation of whether particular oxygen delivery is sufficient to ensure cellular metabolic demands is more challenging. In recent years, specific biochemical parameters have been described to indicate the status between tissue oxygen demands and supply. In this review, the authors summarize the application of some of these biochemical markers, including mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), lactate, central venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PCO2 gap), and PCO2 gap/central arterial-to-venous oxygen difference (Ca-vO2) for hemodynamic assessment of tissue perfusion. The thorough monitoring of the adequacy of tissue perfusion and oxygen supply in critical conditions is essential for the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and it is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circulatory shock; Hemodynamic monitoring; Lactate; Microcirculation; Oxygen saturation; Tissue perfusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387216      PMCID: PMC7921020          DOI: 10.1007/s11010-020-04019-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0300-8177            Impact factor:   3.396


  44 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring: how to choose the optimal method for the individual patient.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.

Authors:  David A Baran; Cindy L Grines; Steven Bailey; Daniel Burkhoff; Shelley A Hall; Timothy D Henry; Steven M Hollenberg; Navin K Kapur; William O'Neill; Joseph P Ornato; Kelly Stelling; Holger Thiele; Sean van Diepen; Srihari S Naidu
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock.

Authors:  H Ait-Oufella; S Lemoinne; P Y Boelle; A Galbois; J L Baudel; J Lemant; J Joffre; D Margetis; B Guidet; E Maury; G Offenstadt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; E Magnus Ohman; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Steffen Desch
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Fluid therapy in critically ill patients: perspectives from the right heart.

Authors:  Paul Elbers; Tim Rodrigus; Esther Nossent; Manu L N G Malbrain; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf
Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther       Date:  2015-11-18

8.  Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Authors:  M A Hayes; A C Timmins; E H Yau; M Palazzo; C J Hinds; D Watson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Gender differences in sepsis: cardiovascular and immunological aspects.

Authors:  Martin K Angele; Sebastian Pratschke; William J Hubbard; Irshad H Chaudry
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.882

View more
  4 in total

1.  Management of increased systemic flow requirements in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sascha Ott; Pia Lanmüller; Gaik Nersesian; Christoph T Starck; Benjamin O'Brien; Volkmar Falk; Evgenij Potapov
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Hemodynamic Changes in Response to Hyperacute Spinal Trauma in a Swine Model.

Authors:  Elise D Barras; Chiara E Hampton; Catherine Takawira; Takashi Taguchi; Ali Nourbakhsh; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.565

3.  Intraoperative fluid therapy for video-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs.

Authors:  Marília Teresa de Oliveira; João Pedro Scussel Feranti; Gabriela Pesamosca Coradini; Rafael Oliveira Chaves; Luis Felipe Dutra Corrêa; Marcella Teixeira Linhares; Roberto Thiesen; Marco Augusto Machado Silva; Maurício Veloso Brun
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.672

4.  Effect of perioperative magnesium sulfate and labetalol infusion on peripheral perfusion and postoperative pain in nasal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel; Marwa Mohamed Medhat; Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem; Sara Mohamed Abdel Naby
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-08-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.