Literature DB >> 33387089

Nutritive value of ensiled Amaranthus powellii Wild. treated with salt and barley.

Ayşe Gül Filik1, Gökhan Filik2.   

Abstract

Silages or ensiled plant parts are important to feed materials for ruminal fermentation and contributed to the feeding of ruminant animals in large share. The current study was conducted to determine the nutritive value of ensiled Amaranthus powellii Wild. (AP) treated with salt and barley. Experimental silages were (1) no supplemented AP forage (control), (2) 1% salt-added AP, (3) 1% salt + 5% barley-added AP, (4) 5% barley-added AP, (5) 1% salt + 7.5% barley-added AP, and (6) 7.5% barley-added AP silages. Silages were analyzed to determine their nutritional contents, physical properties, and microbiota. The DM (g/kg), OM, CP, ADF, NDF, ADL, and ash contents (g/100 g DM) of AP silage were determined as 331.20, 29.84, 12.62, 37.22, 57.72, 42.23, and 3.28, respectively. DM and OM contents were increased by both salt and barley additions while CP and ADF values decreased by these additions (P < 0.01). DDM and RFV values were improved by both salt and barley additions with alone and together usage, reaching the highest levels by 7.5% barley addition (P < 0.01). While salt itself did not affect RFQ, 5%, 7.5% barley, and 1% salt with 5% barley additions decreased this value (P < 0.01), most likely, due to the nutritional content of added barley. The physical properties of AP silage were not affected by any treatment (P > 0.05), except a* and Fleig score (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Salt caused loss natural red coloring in AP silage compared with control silage, while the other additions saved the natural coloring (P < 0.01). Expectedly, all treatments increased lactic acid bacteria count compared with control (P < 0.01). To conclude, AP had the potential to be a good silage with respective to its nutritional contents, feed value, and physical properties with appropriate microbiological status. Salt and barley both can be used to improve the nutritional status of AP silages. Further studies are needed to determine its in vitro digestibility and preference by animals in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amaranthus powellii; Fleig score; Relative feed quality; Relative feed value; Silage additives

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387089     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-020-02470-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  5 in total

1.  Chemical composition and ruminal nutrient degradability of fresh and ensiled amaranth forage.

Authors:  Philippe Seguin; Arif F Mustafa; Danielle J Donnelly; Bruce Gélinas
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 2.  State of knowledge on amaranth grain: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Valéria Maria Caselato-Sousa; Jaime Amaya-Farfán
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, digestibility, and degradability of silages from two amaranth varieties (Kharkovskiy and Sem), corn, and an amaranth-corn combination.

Authors:  N Karimi Rahjerdi; Y Rouzbehan; H Fazaeli; J Rezaei
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Xianjun Yuan; Junfeng Li; Zhihao Dong; Tao Shao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Rumen Fluid and Feces of Dairy Cows on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and in vitro Digestibility of Alfalfa Silage.

Authors:  Linna Guo; Dandan Yao; Dongxia Li; Yanli Lin; Smerjai Bureenok; Kuikui Ni; Fuyu Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.