Literature DB >> 33387050

Surgical outcome and risk factors for cervical spinal cord injury patients in chronic stage: a 2-year follow-up study.

Chengyue Ji1,2, Yuluo Rong2, Hongyu Jia1, Ning Yan1, Tiesheng Hou1, Yao Li1, Weihua Cai3, Shunzhi Yu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the nerve function deficient recovery in surgically treated patients with cervical trauma with spinal cord injury (SCI) in chronic stage and figure out prognostic predictors of improvement in impairment and function.
METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 143 cervical SCI patients in chronic stage and divided into non-operative group (n = 61) and operative group (n = 82). The severity of neurological involvement was assessed using the ASIA motor score (AMS) and Functional Independence Measure Motor Score (FIM MS). The health-related quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Correspondence between the clinical and radiological findings and the neurological outcome was investigated.
RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, surgery resulted in greater improvement in AMS and FIM MS than non-operative group. Regression analysis revealed that lower initial AMS (P = 0.000), longer duration after injury (P = 0.022) and injury above C4 level (P = 0.022) were factors predictive of lower final AMS. Longer duration (P = 0.020) and injury above C4 level (P = 0.010) were associated with a lower FIM MS. SF-36 scores were significantly lower in higher age (P = 0.015), female patients (P = 0.009) and patients with longer duration (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: It is reasonable to consider surgical decompression in patients with cervical SCI in chronic stage and persistent spinal cord compression and/or gross cervical instability. Initial AMS, longer duration, injury above C4 level, higher age and female patients are the five major relevant factors of functional recovery.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical trauma; Risk factor; Spinal cord injury; Surgical decompression

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387050     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06703-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Surgical decompression after spinal cord injury: the earlier, the better!

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Analysis of Delays to Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Daniel D Bohl; Bryce A Basques; Pablo J Diaz-Collado; Adam M Lukasiewicz; Matthew L Webb; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The influence of time from injury to surgery on motor recovery and length of hospital stay in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: an observational Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  Marcel F Dvorak; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Charles G Fisher; Joel Finkelstein; Brian K Kwon; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Jérôme Paquet; Eve C Tsai; Andrea Townson; Najmedden Attabib; Christopher S Bailey; Sean D Christie; Brian Drew; Daryl R Fourney; Richard Fox; R John Hurlbert; Michael G Johnson; A G Linassi; Stefan Parent; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability.

Authors:  Brian Lenehan; Charles G Fisher; Alex Vaccaro; Michael Fehlings; Bizhan Aarabi; Marcel F Dvorak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Current practice in the timing of surgical intervention in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Doron Rabin; William Sears; David W Cadotte; Bizhan Aarabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management.

Authors:  James Guest; Mohammed A Eleraky; Paul J Apostolides; Curtis A Dickman; Volker K H Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  G La Rosa; A Conti; S Cardali; F Cacciola; F Tomasello
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Effectiveness of surgical treatment for traumatic central cord syndrome.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Huilin Yang; Tongqi Yang; Yaozeng Xu; Zhaohua Bao; Tiansi Tang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-01

9.  Trends in the treatment for traumatic central cord syndrome without bone injury in the United States from 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma.

Authors:  Muhammad Sohail Umerani; Asad Abbas; Salman Sharif
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.