Literature DB >> 33387039

The role of clinical factors and immunocheckpoint molecules in the prognosis of patients with supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Liguo Wang1,2, Song Han2, Changxiang Yan3, Yakun Yang2, Zhiqiang Li1, Zuocheng Yang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma (SEE) is a rare subset of ependymomas located in the supratentorial parenchyma, and little is known regarding its management and prognosis. Our study aimed to reveal the prognostic factors in patients with SEE and the roles of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), Ki-67, and neural cell adhesion molecule L1 (L1CAM) in predicting these patients' outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical features and prognostic factors in 48 patients with SEE admitted to our center from April 2008 to October 2018. Tissue slides were constructed from patient samples, and PD-L1, PD-1, Ki-67, and L1CAM expression levels were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Patients with gross total resection (GTR) had better progression-free survival than patients with subtotal resection (STR). Moreover, the recurrence hazard ratios in patients with STR at 3, 5, and 10 years were 8.746, 6.866 and 3.962 times those of patients with GTR, respectively. PD-L1 positivity predicted worse progression-free survival, while the recurrence hazard ratios for patients with PD-L1 positivity at 3, 5, and 10 years were 10.445, 5.539, and 3.949 times those of patients with PD-L1 negativity, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression and GTR could independently predict outcomes in patients with SEE.
CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression was an independent and more readily obtained predictor of outcomes, representing a simple and reliable biological prognostic factor for patients with SEE. Further studies are needed to explore PD-L1 inhibitor treatment for patients with ependymoma. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: No clinical trials were performed in the study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extent of resection (EOR); Ki-67; Neural cell adhesion molecule L1 (L1CAM); Prognosis; Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1); Supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma (SEE)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387039      PMCID: PMC7954746          DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03425-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  37 in total

1.  Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts.

Authors:  David W Ellison; Mehmet Kocak; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Giangaspero Felice; Godfraind Catherine; Torsten Pietsch; Didier Frappaz; Maura Massimino; Jacques Grill; James M Boyett; Richard G Grundy
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2011-05-31

2.  Supratentorial Extraventricular Ependymoma: Retrospective Analysis of 15 Patients at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Joonho Byun; Jeong Hoon Kim; Young-Hoon Kim; Young Hyun Cho; Seok Ho Hong; Chang Jin Kim
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Spinal myxopapillary ependymomas: a retrospective clinical and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Chao Li; Xiaoming Che; Hong Chen; Zhengyan Liu
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Infratentorial ependymomas: prognostic factors and outcome analysis in a multi-center retrospective series of 106 adult patients.

Authors:  Jacques Guyotat; Philippe Metellus; Roch Giorgi; Marylin Barrie; Anne Jouvet; Michelle Fevre-Montange; Olivier Chinot; Anne Durand; Dominique Figarella-Branger
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 5.  Pediatric ependymoma: biological perspectives.

Authors:  John-Paul Kilday; Ruman Rahman; Sara Dyer; Lee Ridley; James Lowe; Beth Coyle; Richard Grundy
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  Pediatric Brain Tumors: Innovative Genomic Information Is Transforming the Diagnostic and Clinical Landscape.

Authors:  Amar Gajjar; Daniel C Bowers; Matthias A Karajannis; Sarah Leary; Hendrik Witt; Nicholas G Gottardo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Identification of Supratentorial C11ORF95-RELA Fused Ependymoma in Routine Neuropathology.

Authors:  Marco Gessi; Marzia Giagnacovo; Piergiorgio Modena; Grazia Elefante; Francesca Gianno; Francesca R Buttarelli; Antonietta Arcella; Vittoria Donofrio; Francesca Diomedi Camassei; Paolo Nozza; Isabella Morra; Maura Massimino; Bianca Pollo; Felice Giangaspero; Manila Antonelli
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  [Intracranial ependymomas in adult patients. Diagnosis and histological prognostic factors].

Authors:  D Figarella-Branger; P Metellus; M Barrié; A Maues de Paula; C Fernandez; M Polivka; A Vital; F Labrousse; J-M Vignaud; A Laquerrière; M-C Rousselet; C Lacroix; S Saikali; F Chapon; M-F Gontier; F Chrétien; P Babin; V Rigau; F Vandenbos; M Peoc'h; M Kujas; O Chinot; J Gouvernet; R Giorgi; J Guyotat; A Jouvet
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Central nervous system tumors: a single center pathology review of 34,140 cases over 60 years.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Xiang Zou; Yin Wang; Ying Mao; Liangfu Zhou
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-05-02

Review 10.  Treatment Decisions of World Health Organization Grade II and III Ependymomas in Molecular Era.

Authors:  Tae-Young Jung; Shin Jung; Hoon Kook; Hee-Jo Baek
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-05-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Classification and Therapeutic Targets in Ependymoma.

Authors:  Thomas Larrew; Brian Fabian Saway; Stephen R Lowe; Adriana Olar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.